Person Perception (College Board AP® Psychology): Revision Note
What is person perception?
Person perception refers to the processes by which we form impressions and make judgments about others, and about ourselves in relation to others
These judgments are not purely objective, but are shaped by:
cognitive shortcuts
prior expectations
social context
Mere exposure effect
The mere exposure effect is the tendency to develop a preference for stimuli simply because we are exposed to them repeatedly
In other words, familiarity increases liking, even without any direct positive experience
E.g. you are more likely to prefer a brand of candy you have seen many times over one you have never encountered.
Research also shows that people:
prefer letters in their own name
prefer their mirror image, while others prefer their photograph
This effect operates largely outside conscious awareness as people are often unaware that familiarity is influencing their judgments
Applications
The mere exposure effect is widely exploited in advertising
Repeated exposure to a brand or product increases consumer preference
it also operates in social contexts
People tend to form more positive impressions of, and greater liking for, those they encounter more frequently (e.g., neighbors, classmates, colleagues)
Self-fulfilling prophecy
A self-fulfilling prophecy occurs when expectations about a person lead to behaviors that cause those expectations to come true
The expectation shapes behavior, which then produces the expected outcome, reinforcing the original belief
E.g. a teacher who believes a student is capable gives them more attention and encouragement, leading to improved performance
Rosenthal & Jacobson (1968) demonstrated this process in schools
Teachers were told that certain students were likely to show rapid academic improvement
The students were selected at random
By the end of the year, these students had made greater progress, as teacher expectations influenced how they were treated
Positive and negative effects
Self-fulfilling prophecies can operate in both positive and negative directions:
Positive: high expectations lead to greater support and encouragement
This produces better outcomes
Negative: low expectations lead to less support and lower-quality interactions
This produces worse outcomes
This has important implications for educational inequality
Self-fulfilling prophecies show that person perception does not simply reflect reality - it actively shapes it
Social comparison and relative deprivation
Social comparison is the process of evaluating ourselves by comparing to others
Festinger (1954) proposed that people have a natural drive to assess their abilities and opinions, especially when objective standards are unavailable
Social comparison can be:
Upward comparison: comparing oneself to someone who is perceived as better off or more capable
This can motivate improvement but can also produce feelings of inadequacy, envy, or low self-esteem
E.g. comparing your exam grade to the top student in the class
Downward comparison: comparing oneself to someone who is perceived as worse off or less capable
This typically enhances self-esteem and produces positive feelings, but can also produce complacency
E.g. comparing your grade to the lowest in the class
Relative deprivation
Relative deprivation is the perception that one is worse off compared to others, even if one’s objective situation is adequate
It is a subjective social comparison, not absolute need
E.g. a person earning a good salary may feel relatively deprived if everyone around them earns significantly more
Relative deprivation can fuel dissatisfaction, resentment, and social unrest
This occurs even in societies where objective living standards are high
Examiner Tips and Tricks
For Skill 1.B, the mere exposure effect is driven by familiarity rather than genuine evaluation
In scenario questions, look for whether repeated exposure may be increasing preference, even when there has been no direct positive experience with the person, product, or stimulus
For Skill 4.A, a defensible claim is that self-fulfilling prophecies can contribute to educational inequality
If teachers hold lower expectations of students from particular demographic groups, those expectations can produce lower outcomes, reinforcing existing inequalities, as shown by Rosenthal & Jacobson’s findings
Unlock more, it's free!
Was this revision note helpful?