The Extended Essay Assessment Criteria (DP IB Extended Essay): Revision Note

Dr Dean West

Written by: Dr Dean West

Reviewed by: Alistair Marjot

Updated on

What are the Assessment Criteria?

Understanding the marks and the purpose of the assessment criteria

  • The assessment criteria are the specific standards used by examiners to appraise an extended essay and award a total mark

    • The essay is marked out of a maximum of 30 marks

    • Examiners use a best-fit approach and don’t expect every indicator in a band to be met

  • High performance in the Extended Essay (EE) and Theory of Knowledge (TOK) can contribute up to three points to the total diploma score

Criterion A — Framework for the Essay

  • Criterion A is worth a maximum of 6 marks

What does criterion A assess?

  • It focuses on the RQ — the focused and clear question that directs the entire research project

    • The RQ must be relevant to the topic, clear and focused in relation to the scope of the essay

  • It evaluates the suitability and application of research methods

    • Research methods include the specific tools and procedures used to collect and analyse data, such as experiments or surveys

  • It assesses the use of structural conventions — the formal rules for organising an academic paper

    • In this context, structure refers to the clarity of the essay's framework rather than just simple formatting

    • Structural conventions are subject-specific academic writing rules (e.g., how and when to use figures/tables; how to label and refer to them; appropriate sectioning), and they should support communication of the research

Criterion B — Knowledge &Understanding

  • Criterion B is worth a maximum of 6 marks

What does criterion B assess?

  • It measures how well a student uses research materials to establish knowledge of their topic

  • It assesses the accurate and consistent use of terminology — the technical words specific to an academic field

    • Using appropriate terminology can show that the student understands the nature of the subject

    • Inaccurate or superficial use of subject-specific language can significantly limit the final marks

  • It evaluates the application of concepts — the key ideas around which subject knowledge is developed

Criterion C — Analysis & Line of Argument

  • Criterion C is worth a maximum of 6 marks

What does criterion C assess?

  • It assesses the quality of analytical writing — a style that moves beyond "what" or "who" to explore the "why" and "how" of research findings

    • Effective analysis breaks down the topic to bring out its essential elements

  • It evaluates the coherence of the line of argument — a sustained thread of logical reasoning that connects the RQ to the findings and conclusion

    • Signposting can be done through topic sentences, transitions, and (where appropriate) headings

Criterion D — Discussion & Evaluation

  • Criterion D is worth a maximum of 8 marks

What does criterion D assess?

  • It is the highest-weighted criterion in the assessment framework

  • It requires a balanced discussion — a considered review of research significance that incorporates multiple perspectives

  • It assesses the quality of evaluation — the process of appraising research by weighing up its strengths and limitations

    • Students should evaluate the effectiveness of the essay (including the suitability of methods, quality/limits of evidence, and how these choices affect findings), explaining relevant strengths and limitations

    • For higher marks, evaluation should be integrated into the discussion, not confined to a single end section

Criterion E — Reflection

  • Criterion E is worth a maximum of 4 marks

What does criterion E assess?

  • Criterion E is applied only to the reflective statement on the student’s RPF

  • It assesses evaluative reflection — the process of thinking back on an experience to understand its impact on the student as a learner

    • Evaluative reflection should also be partially future-oriented and include specific examples of learning

  • It looks for evidence of growth — the development of new skills or a shift in perspective during the research process

    • Generic reflections on basic time management score poorly

    • Students should demonstrate the transfer of learning — applying skills learned during the EE to other areas of study or life

Examiner Tips and Tricks

Students lose marks by treating criteria as a checklist. Examiners award using best-fit, so aim to show strong performance across the whole essay, and remember Criterion E is judged only on the final reflective statement—not the meetings themselves.

Unlock more, it's free!

Join the 100,000+ Students that ❤️ Save My Exams

the (exam) results speak for themselves:

Dr Dean West

Author: Dr Dean West

Expertise: Content Writer

Dr Dean West is a UK-based educator, Principal Examiner and assessment specialist. He leads IB CAS and the Extended Essay at Bromsgrove School, where he also coordinates and teaches IB Business Management. A Chartered Teacher and Chartered Educational Assessor, he has examined for WJEC, Cambridge International and Edexcel, consulted for Ofqual and the British Council. He holds a PhD in Education from the University of Warwick.

Alistair Marjot

Reviewer: Alistair Marjot

Expertise: Environmental Systems and Societies & Biology Content Creator

Alistair graduated from Oxford University with a degree in Biological Sciences. He has taught GCSE/IGCSE Biology, as well as Biology and Environmental Systems & Societies for the International Baccalaureate Diploma Programme. While teaching in Oxford, Alistair completed his MA Education as Head of Department for Environmental Systems & Societies. Alistair has continued to pursue his interests in ecology and environmental science, recently gaining an MSc in Wildlife Biology & Conservation with Edinburgh Napier University.