AI Use in the Extended Essay (DP IB Extended Essay): Revision Note

Dr Dean West

Written by: Dr Dean West

Reviewed by: Alistair Marjot

Updated on

What kinds of AI use are permitted & how must they be acknowledged?

Permitted research support

  • Artificial intelligence (AI) — technologies that use machine learning to augment or replace certain tasks

  • Generative AI — tools that rely heavily on machine learning to seek information and produce new content

  • AI tools can be used to support idea generation, such as identifying ethical dilemmas or refining a research question (RQ) — the focused question that directs the inquiry

  • Students may use these tools for resource comparison and summarising — the process of creating a short version of a long text to determine its relevance

  • Permitted uses include language support, such as translation or using grammar checkers to scaffold communication

  • AI can assist with data analysis by providing visualisation options like charts and graphs for large data sets

  • Tools that suggest spelling/grammar edits are fine, but you must make the decisions yourself; do not use AI to rewrite paragraphs or generate your argument

Prohibited use and academic integrity

  • Students must not use generative AI to write any part of their extended essay

  • The essay must be an authentic piece of work — based on the student's own original ideas while fully acknowledging the work of others

  • Using AI-generated writing and presenting it as your own work is considered dishonest and a breach of academic integrity

  • Academic integrity — a set of values and behaviours that promote honesty in learning and assessment

Formal acknowledgement requirements

  • If you use AI-generated content in your essay (text, images, or paraphrased ideas), you must cite it at the point of use and include it in your bibliography (with prompt + date). If you use AI only for planning (eg brainstorming), keep a prompt log in your RRS as evidence of your process.

  • Bibliography — a list of every source consulted during the research process

  • If AI content is quoted, paraphrased, or used to create images, it must be cited at the point of use

  • In-text citations for AI must use quotation marks around the used content

  • Bibliographic entries for AI must include the specific prompt used — the instruction or question given to the tool — and the date the content was generated

Using AI Tools Responsibly

The skill of prompt engineering

  • Prompt engineering (writing clear, specific questions/prompts)— the process of creating effective and specific instructions to produce desired outputs from an AI tool

  • Learning to write effective prompts is a form of assisted inquiry that develops critical thinking and communication skills

  • Students should record their prompt history and keep a detailed record of their AI interactions

  • Maintaining a prompt history helps to confirm the authenticity of the work and provides evidence of the student's own research process

Verifying accuracy and reliability

  • Students are responsible for evaluating the accuracy and reliability of any information suggested by AI

  • AI tools can hallucinate — a phenomenon where the technology generates false or fabricated information

  • All AI-generated content must be checked for bias — an unfair preference for a particular idea or group — and factual inaccuracies

  • Information must be validated against vetted sources — materials such as academic journals or encyclopaedias that have undergone a formal review process

Examiner Tips and Tricks

 Keep a simple AI-use log in your RRS (tool, prompt, date, how you used it). If any AI-generated wording or imagery makes it into your essay, cite it immediately at the point of use and add the full reference (including prompt and date) in the bibliography.

AI as a non-authoritative source

  • AI tools cannot be treated as authoritative academic sources because they may rely on unvetted or community-based knowledge

  • Students must use critical thinking to filter through AI suggestions rather than relying on them as primary evidence

  • The quality of AI output depends heavily on the student's ability to query the tool effectively and evaluate the results

Unlock more, it's free!

Join the 100,000+ Students that ❤️ Save My Exams

the (exam) results speak for themselves:

Dr Dean West

Author: Dr Dean West

Expertise: Content Writer

Dr Dean West is a UK-based educator, Principal Examiner and assessment specialist. He leads IB CAS and the Extended Essay at Bromsgrove School, where he also coordinates and teaches IB Business Management. A Chartered Teacher and Chartered Educational Assessor, he has examined for WJEC, Cambridge International and Edexcel, consulted for Ofqual and the British Council. He holds a PhD in Education from the University of Warwick.

Alistair Marjot

Reviewer: Alistair Marjot

Expertise: Environmental Systems and Societies & Biology Content Creator

Alistair graduated from Oxford University with a degree in Biological Sciences. He has taught GCSE/IGCSE Biology, as well as Biology and Environmental Systems & Societies for the International Baccalaureate Diploma Programme. While teaching in Oxford, Alistair completed his MA Education as Head of Department for Environmental Systems & Societies. Alistair has continued to pursue his interests in ecology and environmental science, recently gaining an MSc in Wildlife Biology & Conservation with Edinburgh Napier University.