Challenges to Sovereignty (DP IB Global Politics: HL): Revision Note
The nature of challenges to sovereignty
State sovereignty refers to a state’s ability to exercise full control within its borders without external interference
However, in contemporary global politics, this control is often limited or challenged
Challenges to sovereignty occur when a state is unable to fully control its territory, population, or decision-making, either due to internal pressures or external actors
These challenges can be broadly grouped into three main types:
Economic challenges – from actors such as transnational companies (TNCs) that influence state decision-making
Political and identity-based challenges – from nationalist movements seeking autonomy or independence
Security challenges – from violent non-state actors that undermine state authority through force
Examiner Tips and Tricks
When examining challenges to state sovereignty, it is important to identify what aspect of sovereignty is being challenged and how
Transnational companies (TNCs)
A transnational company is a large business that operates and manages production or services in more than one country
Increased global interdependence has facilitated the growth in financial power of several TNCs
Companies like Amazon, Apple and Saudi Aramco have more wealth than many states - this power can be used to challenge state sovereignty
Many less economically developed states enter into agreements with TNCs in the hope this will facilitate economic growth
Although this can be beneficial it can also threaten state sovereignty when
TNCs take over resource extraction, thereby limiting the government’s ability to manage its economic resources
TNCs demand regulations and laws be adapted, thereby limiting the state’s control of the legal and judicial system
TNCs financially support and lobby for politicians who will be compliant to their demands, thereby interfering with government leadership
Political theorists such as Samir Amin argue that many TNCs are a modern version of colonial rulers
Their primary purpose when dealing with less economically developed states is exploitation - by extracting resources, taking most of the profits, and manipulating policy to serve their own interests
Nationalist movements
Sometimes groups of people (usually living within a state but sometimes across many states) share a common cultural identity which differs from most of the population
These groups are sometimes referred to as nation-states
They sometimes reject the authority of the state they live in and wish to create their own sovereign state
Nationalism movements can be linked to long historical grievances
Often these groups feel that they have been unfairly treated by the government of the state in which they currently live
By rejecting the authority of the state, they challenge its internal sovereignty
Nationalist movements can use violent methods which threaten states’ exclusive use of force and border security, and contribute to regional instability
E.g. The Catalonian independence movement has used violence to challenge the authority of the Spanish state
Nationalist movements can also use peaceful methods but still challenge the authority of the state
Indigenous land claims and claims for greater political autonomy are being peacefully negotiated in Canada and Australia
Nationalist movements can also span across several states
Case Study
The Kurdish Nationalist Movement
Background
The Kurdish nationalist movement is an example of a movement that spans several states
The Kurdish people share a common language, culture and identity, but they do not have their own independent state
Instead, Kurdish populations live mainly in Türkiye, Iraq, Iran and Syria
Demands and grievances
Many Kurds argue that they have been politically and culturally marginalised by the governments of the states they live in
As a result, some groups have demanded greater autonomy or the creation of an independent Kurdish state
Different strategies
Different Kurdish organisations have used different strategies
In Turkey, the PKK (Kurdistan Workers’ Party) has used violent resistance, challenging the authority and security of the Turkish state
In northern Iraq, Kurdish leaders have pursued more peaceful political methods, gaining a degree of regional autonomy within Iraq
Violent non-state actors
Violent non-state actors always threaten state sovereignty
They challenge the state’s right to the exclusive use of force
They contribute to social instability and instill a lack of confidence in political leadership and policing
They often cross borders illegally
Violent non-state actors can challenge the sovereignty of multiple states simultaneously, both through direct conflict and by encouraging attacks across national borders
Case Study
Islamic State (ISIS) and challenges to state sovereignty
Background
Islamic State (ISIS) is a militant extremist group that has used violence to challenge the sovereignty of multiple states
At its peak in the mid-2010s, ISIS controlled large areas of Iraq and Syria, attempting to establish its own political authority and ignoring the existing borders of those states
Expansion and attacks
ISIS has also carried out or supported attacks in many other countries, including Egypt, Yemen, Somalia, Nigeria, Mali, Niger, Burkina Faso, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Afghanistan and Pakistan
These attacks have threatened governments’ ability to maintain security and control within their borders
Significance
ISIS has also used social media and online propaganda to encourage individuals in other countries to carry out attacks
This strategy has led to violent incidents in several states, including the 2024 Christmas market attack in Magdeburg, Germany, which killed five people and injured many others
Unlock more, it's free!
Was this revision note helpful?