Government Actions Influencing Legitimacy (DP IB Global Politics: HL): Revision Note

Jane Hirons

Written by: Jane Hirons

Reviewed by: Steve Vorster

Updated on

How states and governments gain legitimacy

  • Legitimacy refers to the extent to which a state or government is accepted as rightful and deserving of authority by its population and the international community

  • States and governments gain legitimacy in a number of ways, and the extent of their legitimacy often depends on how successfully they meet these criteria:

    • Maintaining order and stability – governments are expected to provide security and prevent conflict or disorder

    • Economic, political and social development – improving living standards, rights and opportunities for citizens

    • Sustained development – ensuring long-term growth and stability rather than short-term success

    • Free and fair elections – allowing citizens to choose their leaders through transparent and competitive processes

    • Representation and consent – ensuring that governments reflect the will of the people and act with their approval

    • Quality of governance – providing effective public services, upholding the rule of law and protecting rights

    • International recognition – being accepted as a legitimate state by other states and global organisations

  • The relative importance of these factors varies between states. In some systems, legitimacy is primarily based on democratic participation, while in others it may rely more on economic performance or stability.

Quality of governance and development

  • Citizens expect their governments to provide and maintain services that provide them with a good quality of life

  • 'Good' can mean different things to different people but generally it includes

    • Effective and accessible educational institutions

    • Low crime

    • Economic development

    • Access to health care 

    • Decent housing

    • Clean water 

    • Fair police and judicial systems

    • Reliable public transportation

    • Safe and well-maintained public spaces such as parks, library and museums 

  • The legitimacy of a government that is unable or unwilling to provide or maintain a good quality of life for citizens usually lacks legitimacy

    • In democracies people can protest, and their governments can be voted out

    • In single-party states, citizens can rarely openly voice their views on the legitimacy of the government

  • Within democracies, citizens are supposed to be involved in decisions made by governments

  • Citizen participation in government differs between states and in different situations

Diagram illustrating levels of citizen participation: Information, Consultation, Concertation, Co-Creation, Co-Decision, Delegated Power, and Citizen Control.
Adapted from strategicdesignscenarios.net

Level

Explanation

Information

  • Citizens are given information about what the government is doing, including decisions that have been made or plans that are being discussed

Consultation

  • Governments present ideas or proposals to citizens and ask for their opinions, feedback or concerns

Concertation

  • Governments invite citizens or representatives of interest groups to discuss plans, share views and possibly negotiate changes

Co-creation

  • Citizens work together with government officials from the early stages to help design policies or plans

Co-decision

  • Governments and citizens make final decisions together as partners

Delegated power

  • Governments give citizens the authority to create policies or make decisions on their behalf

Citizen control

  • Citizens have full power to make and manage decisions themselves without government control

  • By having a say in government decision-making, citizens are more likely to approve of them and view the government as legitimate

  • In states where there is a lack of transparency in decision-making, citizens may not accept policies and the legitimacy of the government could be questioned

  • Ultimately no state could function if citizens had to be involved in every decision 

    • Although some citizen participation may strengthen legitimacy, it does not guarantee it

International recognition

  • Some places consider themselves to be states but are not universally recognised by other states and non-state actors

  • Membership of intergovernmental organisations (IGOs) can indicate whether a state has global recognition and legitimacy

Case Study

Palestine and recognition at the United Nations

  • Palestine currently has non-member observer state status at the UN

    • This allows Palestinian representatives to attend debates in the General Assembly and speak on issues, but they cannot propose resolutions or vote

World map showing countries recognising Palestine by year and those open to recognition. Colour legend identifies years and intentions from 1988 to 2025.

Barriers to full membership

  • Although 147 of the 193 UN member states recognise Palestine as a state and support full UN membership, final approval must be granted by the UN Security Council

  • The United States has repeatedly vetoed attempts to grant Palestine full membership

Significance

  • As a result, Palestine has limited formal recognition within the UN system, which reduces its international legitimacy in some respects

  • However, the large number of states supporting Palestinian membership suggests that many countries do recognise Palestine as a legitimate state

  • The quality of governance can impact global recognition and diminish legitimacy in the eyes of some actors

    • Legitimacy in global politics is not always universally agreed

      • Different actors may view the legitimacy of a state in different ways

Case Study

North Korea and international legitimacy

A political map of the Korean Peninsula divided along the 38th Parallel. North Korea is shaded in red with its capital, Pyongyang, marked by a black star. South Korea is shaded in blue with its capital, Seoul, also marked by a black star. China is shown to the northwest in grey. The dashed line labeled

Background

  • North Korea provides an example of how state legitimacy can vary depending on perspective

  • The country has faced strong criticism from many states and NGOs because of its human rights record and authoritarian political system, which has reduced its legitimacy in the eyes of many actors

Recognition and criticism

  • North Korea is still a member of the United Nations, meaning it is formally recognised as a state within the international system

  • However, some governments question this legitimacy because North Korea has defied UN resolutions, particularly those related to nuclear weapons and international security

Significance

  • At the same time, some states, including China and Russia, maintain diplomatic relations with North Korea and treat it as a legitimate state

Unlock more, it's free!

Join the 100,000+ Students that ❤️ Save My Exams

the (exam) results speak for themselves:

Jane Hirons

Author: Jane Hirons

Expertise: Content Writer

Jane has been actively involved in all levels of educational endeavors including designing curriculum, teaching and assessment. She has extensive experience as an international classroom teacher and understands the challenges students face when it comes to revision.

Steve Vorster

Reviewer: Steve Vorster

Expertise: Economics & Business Subject Lead

Steve has taught A Level, GCSE, IGCSE Business and Economics - as well as IBDP Economics and Business Management. He is an IBDP Examiner and IGCSE textbook author. His students regularly achieve 90-100% in their final exams. Steve has been the Assistant Head of Sixth Form for a school in Devon, and Head of Economics at the world's largest International school in Singapore. He loves to create resources which speed up student learning and are easily accessible by all.