Theories of Power (DP IB Global Politics: SL): Revision Note

Jane Hirons

Written by: Jane Hirons

Reviewed by: Lisa Eades

Updated on

Power to

  • Power to is the capability or authority to bring about change

    • This can come from some kind of position of responsibility

      • The UN has the authority to authorise sanctions

      • Political parties or leaders have the authority to make changes

      • Parents have the authority to choose the school their child enrols in 

      • A hockey team has the capability to compete in the Olympics

  • Power to often refers to the power of individuals to have agency

    • Decide their own path in life

    • Make decisions for themselves 

    • To help others or to do good or bad in the world

Power over

  • Power over is relational - the ability of one actor to control or influence the actions and decisions of another actor

  • One actor can control the actions of another by force if necessary

  • Power over is relatively common, though it is usually seen in a negative light

    • Power over others implies one actor is subordinate in a relationship between two actors

    • Feminist political theorists such as Hannah Pitkin argue that many traditional female-male interactions involve men having power over women and the result is oppressive to women

    • Realism sees power over as the desire of every state in search of hegemony 

  • Political philosopher Hannah Arendt equates power over with violence because it implies domination and force

    • She saw power over not as a sign of true power

      • If the only way you can get someone to do what you want them to do is by force, then you don’t really have true power

      • Force and violence is always a sign of powerlessness, not power

Case Study

Russia’s invasion of Ukraine (2022–present)

Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in 2022 is an example of power over in international politics

Military vehicles on a snowy highway, leader in foreground, convoy continuing up a winding road, flanked by snow-covered fields and sparse trees.

Use of military force

  • Russia used military force to try to control Ukraine’s territory and influence its political decisions, including preventing Ukraine from moving closer to Western organisations such as NATO and the European Union

  • This reflects the realist idea that states seek power and dominance over others in order to protect their interests

  • By using its larger military, Russia attempted to force Ukraine to act in ways that supported Russian strategic goals

Power and violence

  • However, the invasion also illustrates Hannah Arendt’s argument about power and violence

  • Russia relied heavily on military force and coercion, which some theorists argue shows a lack of genuine political influence or legitimacy

Overall significance

The conflict demonstrates how power over often involves domination and violence, where one actor attempts to impose its will on another rather than persuading or cooperating with it

Power with

  • Power with is cooperative power, where actors have equal opportunity to work together to effect change 

    • For Hannah Arendt and Hannah Pitkin power with is always more successful and sustainable than power over

    • NGOs such as the United Nations are modelled on an idea of power with, as states and non-state actors work collaboratively to bring about change

    • Democracies are modelled on the idea of power with between citizens and government

Case Study

The Paris Climate Agreement (2015)

Background

  • The Paris Climate Agreement, negotiated through the United Nations, is an example of power with in global politics

  • In 2015, nearly 200 countries worked together to agree on a plan to limit global temperature increases and reduce greenhouse gas emissions

Cooperation between actors

  • Instead of forcing countries to act, the agreement encourages states to cooperate and set their own climate targets

  • Governments, NGOs, scientists and businesses all contributed to the discussions and continue to work together to address climate change

Significance

  • This shows power with because change is achieved through collaboration and shared responsibility rather than one actor forcing others to comply

  • Supporters argue that agreements like the Paris Climate Agreement demonstrate that cooperation between actors can often be more effective and sustainable than coercion or domination

Unlock more, it's free!

Join the 100,000+ Students that ❤️ Save My Exams

the (exam) results speak for themselves:

Jane Hirons

Author: Jane Hirons

Expertise: Content Writer

Jane has been actively involved in all levels of educational endeavors including designing curriculum, teaching and assessment. She has extensive experience as an international classroom teacher and understands the challenges students face when it comes to revision.

Lisa Eades

Reviewer: Lisa Eades

Expertise: Business Content Creator

Lisa has taught A Level, GCSE, BTEC and IBDP Business for over 20 years and is a senior Examiner for Edexcel. Lisa has been a successful Head of Department in Kent and has offered private Business tuition to students across the UK. Lisa loves to create imaginative and accessible resources which engage learners and build their passion for the subject.