External Actors & Stakeholders Threatening State Legitimacy (DP IB Global Politics: SL): Revision Note

Jane Hirons

Written by: Jane Hirons

Reviewed by: Steve Vorster

Updated on

External interference and state legitimacy

  • External actors can interfere with a state’s right to self-govern, limiting its ability to make independent decisions

  • This can reduce state legitimacy if citizens perceive that their government is controlled, influenced or unable to act in their interests

  • However, the extent to which legitimacy is affected varies depending on the nature of the interference and the strength of the state

External factors causing political, economic and social instability

  • In our increasingly globalised world, external actors can and do influence the political, economic and social stability of the state

Other states

  • State actors can contribute to political instability by interfering in another country’s political processes

  • One way this can happen is through disinformation campaigns on social media, which attempt to influence elections and public opinion

    • E.g. According to the US Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Russia organised a social media disinformation campaign during the 2016 US presidential election

      • The campaign aimed to damage Hillary Clinton’s reputation and support Donald Trump, which led many people to question the legitimacy of the election result

  • This can undermine legitimacy if citizens believe elections or political outcomes are being manipulated by foreign powers

Transnational corporations (TNCs)

  • Transnational corporations are large companies that operate and manage production or services in several different countries

    • They can affect the economic and political stability of a state

  • On the positive side, they can create jobs, investment and economic growth, which may strengthen the legitimacy of governments

    • However, problems can occur if corporations break laws, damage the environment or use corruption, especially in weaker states

  • If governments fail to regulate TNCs effectively, they may be seen as weak or complicit, reducing public trust

Case Study

Glencore and governance in the Democratic Republic of the Congo

People holding a banner with "GLENCORE" and a handmade sign reading "NEVER FEED GLENCORE THE WOLF" during a protest.

Background

  • Mining company Glencore, a large transnational corporation, has faced accusations of corruption, environmental damage and the use of child labour linked to its operations in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC)

  • The DRC is a resource-rich but politically fragile state

Governance challenges

  • Weak state institutions make it difficult for the government to regulate powerful multinational companies

  • Allegations that mining companies have engaged in corruption or harmful practices have led to criticism of both the corporations and the government

Significance

  • These accusations have damaged public trust in the government

  • Some citizens believe the authorities have failed to properly regulate mining activities or protect local communities

Intergovernmental organisations (IGOs)

  • Joining an intergovernmental organisation can bring potential economic and political benefits, such as financial support, trade access or cooperation with other states

    • However, the rules and conditions imposed by these organisations may cause social or political unrest if citizens view them as unfair

    • E.g., during the Greek financial crisis (2008–2015), organisations including the European Union and the International Monetary Fund required Greece to introduce austerity measures in return for financial support

    • These policies led to large protests and social unrest, as many citizens believed the measures were harmful and illegitimate

  • This can weaken legitimacy if governments are perceived as implementing externally imposed policies rather than acting in the interests of their citizens

External actors using violence and force

  • Failure to maintain security can significantly reduce legitimacy, as the state is no longer seen as capable of protecting its population

    • The use of violence and force by external actors can be devastating for state legitimacy because it undermines the authority and capability of the state

  • External actors include

    • Other states

    • Violent non-state actors, such as resistance groups or drug traffickers

    • IGOs supporting humanitarian intervention 

    • Individuals with links to terrorist groups

  • External actors using violence and force impact the social, political and economic stability of the state. 

    • If the state government or agencies are unable to protect citizens from violence or force, there is a good chance that their approval of that government will reduce

Examiner Tips and Tricks

The impact of external interference on legitimacy varies: in strong states it may have limited effects, while in weaker states it can significantly undermine trust in government and political stability

Unlock more, it's free!

Join the 100,000+ Students that ❤️ Save My Exams

the (exam) results speak for themselves:

Jane Hirons

Author: Jane Hirons

Expertise: Content Writer

Jane has been actively involved in all levels of educational endeavors including designing curriculum, teaching and assessment. She has extensive experience as an international classroom teacher and understands the challenges students face when it comes to revision.

Steve Vorster

Reviewer: Steve Vorster

Expertise: Economics & Business Subject Lead

Steve has taught A Level, GCSE, IGCSE Business and Economics - as well as IBDP Economics and Business Management. He is an IBDP Examiner and IGCSE textbook author. His students regularly achieve 90-100% in their final exams. Steve has been the Assistant Head of Sixth Form for a school in Devon, and Head of Economics at the world's largest International school in Singapore. He loves to create resources which speed up student learning and are easily accessible by all.