Syllabus Edition

First teaching 2025

First exams 2027

Statistical tests (DP IB Psychology): Revision Note

Claire Neeson

Written by: Claire Neeson

Reviewed by: Raj Bonsor

Updated on

Hypotheses

  • A hypothesis is a testable statement written as a prediction of what the researcher expects to find as a result of their experiment

  • Where the aim of a study is expressed in general terms and outlines the focus of the study; hypotheses must be precise and unambiguous

  • There are two types of hypothesis:

    • The null hypothesis (H)

    • The alternative hypothesis (H1)

Alternative hypothesis (H1)

  • The H1 should include the independent variable (IV) and the dependent variable (DV)

  • Both the IV and the DV in the H1 should be operationalised, which involves specifics on how each variable is to be manipulated (IV) and measured (DV)

  • There are two different types of H1:

    • Directional (one-tailed)

    • Non-directional (two-tailed)

  • A directional hypothesis predicts the direction of the difference in conditions, i.e., it state that one condition will outperform the other

    • E.g., Participants who drink 200ml of caffeine before taking a memory test will correctly recall more items out of 15 than participants who drink 200ml of water before taking the same memory test

  • A non-directional hypothesis does not predict the direction of the difference in conditions, i.e., it simply predicts that a difference will be shown

    • E.g., There will be a difference in the number of correctly recalled items out of 15 depending on whether participants have drunk 200ml of caffeine or 200ml of water before taking a memory test

Null hypothesis (H0)

  • All published psychological research must include the null hypothesis (H); this is what all research starts with

  • The H begins with the idea that the IV will not affect the DV

    • It is the default assumption unless empirical evidence proves otherwise

Testing hypotheses

  • The researcher must then write the H₀, which assumes ‘no difference

    • E.g., There will be no difference in the number of correctly recalled items out of 15 depending on whether participants have drunk 200ml of caffeine or 200ml of water before taking a memory test

    • The researcher runs the experiment, uses statistical testing and then must form one of two conclusions:

      • If the result shows no difference between conditions (i.e., it is not statistically significant), then the H must be accepted

      • If the result shows a difference between conditions (i.e., it is statistically significant), then the Hcan be rejected (and the H1 is then accepted)

Hypotheses in correlational research

  • Hypotheses for correlational investigations are written in the same way as experimental hypotheses, apart from one crucial difference

    • Instead of using the term 'difference', you have to use the term 'relationship or correlation', e.g.,

      • There will be a relationship between the number of cups of caffeine drunk and the number of hours slept per night across one week

        • This is a non-directional hypothesis

      • There will be a negative correlation between the number of cups of caffeine drunk and the number of hours slept per night across one week

        • This is a non-directional hypothesis

      • There will be no relationship between the number of cups of caffeine drunk and the number of hours slept per night across one week

        • This is a null hypothesis

Factors affecting the choice of a statistical test

  • A statistical test determines if a difference/correlation is statistically significant according the level of significance applied

  • Applying a statistical test to a data set determines:

    • if the outcome is due to chance or to the effect of the IV on the DV

    • whether the null hypothesis can be accepted or rejected

  • There are 3 distinct criteria that a researcher must consider before deciding which statistical test to use:

    • Have they conducted a test of difference or a test of correlation?

    • If they have conducted a test of difference, did they use an independent measures design, repeated measures design, or a matched pairs design?

      • an unrelated design refers to independent measures/groups

      • a related design refers to repeated measures and matched pairs

    • Have they collected nominal, ordinal or interval data?

  • The table below illustrates which test should be used and when:

Tests of Difference

Tests of association or correlation

Unrelated design

Related design

Nominal data

Chi-Squared

Sign test

Chi-Squared

Ordinal data

Mann Whitney U

Wilcoxon T

Spearman's rho

Interval data (Parametric tests)

Unrelated t-test

Related t-test

Pearson's r

  •  Chi-Squared is a test of both difference and association

  • Spearman's rho and Pearson's r are tests of correlation

Parametric & non-parametric tests

  • Parametric tests assume the following:

    • A normal distribution

      • Occurs when data is symmetrical around the mean

      • Most scores cluster near the mean; fewer are at the extremes

      • Produces the familiar bell curve shape

      • E.g., height is a measurement that has a normal distribution

    • The use of interval data or ratio data

      • Requires the most sensitive and precise level of measurement

    • Homogeneity of variance

      • If the set of scores per data set/condition are similar in terms of their dispersion

      • If both conditions have similar standard deviations, this suggests the data is equally spread and clustered around the mean

  • Non-parametric tests do not follow the same criteria as parametric tests

    • There is no assumption of a normal distribution

      • Useful when data is skewed or not continuous

      • E.g., scores on a memory test

    • Non-parametric tests use nominal or ordinal data

    • Non-parametric tests do not depend on homogeneity of variance

  • Parametric tests are more powerful and precise than non-parametric tests

    • More likely to detect a significant difference or correlation if one truly exists

Unlock more, it's free!

Join the 100,000+ Students that ❤️ Save My Exams

the (exam) results speak for themselves:

Claire Neeson

Author: Claire Neeson

Expertise: Psychology Content Creator

Claire has been teaching for 34 years, in the UK and overseas. She has taught GCSE, A-level and IB Psychology which has been a lot of fun and extremely exhausting! Claire is now a freelance Psychology teacher and content creator, producing textbooks, revision notes and (hopefully) exciting and interactive teaching materials for use in the classroom and for exam prep. Her passion (apart from Psychology of course) is roller skating and when she is not working (or watching 'Coronation Street') she can be found busting some impressive moves on her local roller rink.

Raj Bonsor

Reviewer: Raj Bonsor

Expertise: Psychology & Sociology Content Creator

Raj joined Save My Exams in 2024 as a Senior Content Creator for Psychology & Sociology. Prior to this, she spent fifteen years in the classroom, teaching hundreds of GCSE and A Level students. She has experience as Subject Leader for Psychology and Sociology, and her favourite topics to teach are research methods (especially inferential statistics!) and attachment. She has also successfully taught a number of Level 3 subjects, including criminology, health & social care, and citizenship.