Disability, Inequality & Life Chances (WJEC Eduqas GCSE Sociology): Revision Note
Exam code: C200
What is disability?
A disability is when a person has a physical or mental impairment that has a long-term effect on their ability to do everyday activities
Disabled people may face barriers that prevent full participation in society
Sociologists argue that disability is socially constructed, i.e. its meaning depends on how society treats disabled people
Life chances consequence:
Discrimination, exclusion, and lack of accessibility can limit disabled people’s opportunities in education, work, and daily life
The medical model of disability
The medical model views disability as a problem within the individual
It sees the person as needing treatment or a cure to “fix” their condition
The focus is on what the individual cannot do, rather than what society can do to include them
E.g. a person who uses a wheelchair is seen as limited by their impairment, rather than by the lack of ramps or lifts
Life chances consequence:
This view can lead to stigma and exclusion, making people feel dependent and powerless instead of supported and valued
The social model of disability
The social model, developed by Mike Oliver (1983), argues that disability is caused by society’s barriers, not by the person’s condition
It focuses on removing obstacles — physical, social, and attitudinal — so that disabled people can fully participate
E.g. a visually impaired student can access learning if materials are available in Braille or audio form
Disability charities, such as Scope, promote this model to encourage inclusion
Life chances consequence:
When society removes barriers and changes attitudes, disabled people gain equal access to education, work, and independence
Education
Children with disabilities may experience educational underachievement due to:
lack of resources or specialist support in schools
teachers’ low expectations and social stigma
bullying and exclusion from school activities
Inclusive education policies aim to support disabled students, but provision varies between schools
Life chances consequence:
Educational disadvantage limits qualifications, reducing future opportunities in higher education and employment
Work and employment
Disabled people are more likely to face unemployment and discrimination in the labour market
The Equality and Human Rights Commission (2014) reported a disability pay gap of 11% for men and 22% for women
The TUC (2015) found that disabled women face a double disadvantage — gender and disability
Many are forced into part-time work, or experience underemployment
The Equality Act 2010 made it illegal to discriminate against disabled people at work, but inequalities persist
Life chances consequence:
Lower pay, fewer job opportunities, and workplace discrimination reduce financial independence and long-term security
Income and wealth
Disabled people are at higher risk of poverty because:
they often earn less or are excluded from full-time work
they face extra costs for care, transport, and equipment
the benefits system can be complex and stressful to access
The Work Capability Assessment has been criticised for reinforcing stereotypes about “benefit dependency”
Life chances consequence:
Lower income and higher living costs reduce disabled people’s ability to enjoy the same quality of life as non-disabled people
Mental health and wellbeing
People with disabilities often experience poorer health outcomes, both physically and mentally
Social isolation, unemployment, and stigma contribute to stress, anxiety, and depression
Disabled women and those with mental health conditions face the highest discrimination rates
NHS and public health services sometimes fail to make reasonable adjustments, reinforcing inequality
Life chances consequence:
Inequality in healthcare access and social stigma can worsen existing conditions, reducing life expectancy and wellbeing
Media representation
The media often reinforces negative stereotypes about disabled people by:
portraying them as helpless, tragic, or inspirational “heroes”
focusing on benefits and dependency rather than inclusion and achievement
Sociologist Colin Barnes found that disabled people are often shown as objects of pity or fear
Lucy Wood (2012) reported that only 2% of media workers were disabled, compared with 19% of the UK workforce
However, representation is slowly improving:
Coronation Street introduced Izzy Armstrong, a wheelchair user with Ehlers-Danlos syndrome
Comedian Rosie Jones, who has cerebral palsy, appears regularly on television and challenges stereotypes
Life chances consequence:
Negative media portrayals reinforce prejudice, while positive representation can improve public attitudes and promote inclusion
Crime and discrimination
Disabled people are more likely to be victims of hate crime than non-disabled people
ONS (2024) recorded over 11 719 disability-related hate crimes in one year
This could be related to media-fuelled moral panics — such as claims that disabled people were “benefit scroungers” — which increased hostility after the 2008 financial crisis
Disabled people may also face difficulties accessing justice, including poor support from police and courts
Life chances consequence:
Fear of harassment and discrimination can limit disabled people’s freedom, independence, and confidence to engage in society
Social exclusion
Disabled people may experience social exclusion and marginalisation — being left out of education, work, and leisure activities
Barriers include:
inaccessible buildings and transport
negative attitudes from others
lack of representation in decision-making roles
This exclusion leads to isolation, loneliness, and dependency, particularly for people with mental health conditions
Life chances consequence:
Social exclusion reduces participation, confidence, and access to key opportunities, reinforcing inequality
Sociological perspectives on disability, inequality & life chances
Marxism
Marxists argue that society values people based on their economic productivity
Disabled people are treated as less valuable because they are seen as not contributing to capitalist profit
This leads to exclusion and discrimination in employment
The benefits system and charity appeals may appear supportive, but they reinforce dependence rather than equality
Laws such as the Disability Discrimination Act (1996) and Equality Act (2010) aim to help, but inequality persists due to capitalist priorities
Disabled people face structural barriers rooted in class inequality and capitalism, keeping them at a disadvantage
Functionalism
Functionalists view society as a system where everyone performs a role
Disability can be seen as dysfunctional if it prevents individuals from fulfilling expected roles, e.g. employment
However, functionalists also recognise that welfare policies, education and healthcare can help integrate disabled people into society
When barriers are removed, inclusion strengthens social stability
According to functionalists, societies function better when disabled people are supported to participate — exclusion weakens the whole system
Feminism
Feminists highlight the double disadvantage faced by disabled women:
Gender inequality plus discrimination due to disability
Disabled women are more likely to work part-time or in low-paid jobs
Many are carers as well as being disabled themselves — facing a triple burden of gender, disability and poverty
Older disabled women are especially vulnerable to isolation and poor pensions
Feminists argue for more recognition of disabled women’s experiences in employment, healthcare and media
Unlock more, it's free!
Did this page help you?