Ethnicity & Education: The Importance of Material Factors (WJEC Eduqas GCSE Sociology): Revision Note
Exam code: C200
Statistics on ethnicity & educational achievement
Statistics show that students from some minority ethnic groups (such as Chinese and Indian) achieve better results in public examinations than others (such as Black Caribbean and Pakistani)
E.g. in England in 2026, the average Attainment 8 score was 66.4 for Chinese pupils and 59.6 for Indian pupils, compared with 46.2 for all pupils and 39.1 for Black Caribbean pupils (DfE, provisional)
Research shows that some of the differences in achievement between ethnic groups may reflect social class differences
White British boys on free school meals are among the lowest-achieving groups; only Gypsy/Roma and Irish Traveller pupils do worse
However, gaps between ethnic groups have changed over time, e.g. since 2019 Black and Asian pupils’ average GCSE scores have risen, while White pupils’ scores have fallen slightly (DfE, 2026)
Problems with using statistics
One problem is that in some studies, the categories used to classify ethnic groups are too general
Studies using the term 'Asian' would not allow us to see the differences in achievement between Indian, Pakistani and Bangladeshi students
An additional issue is that the majority of the statistics generated do not enable us to investigate the potential impact of social class background on the achievement of different ethnic groups
Material deprivation
Students from some minority ethnic groups — such as Black Caribbean and Bangladeshi pupils — are more likely to experience material deprivation than White British pupils
Educational underachievement can result from economic factors such as poor housing and low income, as:
around 65% of Bangladeshi, 59% of Pakistani and 49% of Black children live in low-income households (after housing costs), compared with 24% of White British children (DWP, 2021 to 2024)
ethnic minorities are twice as likely to be unemployed (6% compared with 3% of White people, 2022)
Contributing factors include:
living in areas with high unemployment or low-paid work
having foreign qualifications that are not recognised in the UK
racial discrimination in the labour and housing markets
These inequalities are reflected in the proportion of children from ethnic minority groups eligible for free school meals (FSM)
Indian pupils, whose achievements are generally above average, tend to come from more affluent families
Therefore, when comparing ethnic differences in educational achievement, it is essential to consider social class and economic inequalities

Evaluation of material deprivation
FSM comparisons
African-Caribbean pupils on free school meals sometimes perform better than White pupils from similar economic backgrounds
This shows that material deprivation alone cannot explain all differences in attainment between ethnic groups
Community and cultural factors
In Tower Hamlets (London), Bangladeshi pupils have achieved significant success
Researchers suggest this may be due to schools employing Bangladeshi teachers who understand students’ language and culture, helping them to engage more confidently in learning
This shows how cultural understanding and inclusive school practices can reduce the negative effects of material deprivation
Interaction of multiple factors
While poverty remains a major cause of underachievement, it interacts with cultural, institutional and school-based influences
Therefore, sociologists argue that a combination of factors must be considered, rather than material deprivation alone, to understand ethnic differences in educational achievement
Unlock more, it's free!
Was this revision note helpful?
Build on this topic