Social Groups Likely to Experience Poverty (WJEC Eduqas GCSE Sociology): Revision Note

Exam code: C200

Raj Bonsor

Written by: Raj Bonsor

Reviewed by: Naomi Holyoak

Updated on

Groups at risk of poverty

  • The likelihood of living in poverty is not evenly distributed across society — some social groups are much more likely to be affected than others

  • The proportion of people in poverty is relatively high among:

    • older people

    • people with disabilities or long-term illness

    • people from minority ethnic groups

    • women

    • families with children, especially lone-parent families

  • These groups are more likely to experience poorer health, lower educational attainment, insecure housing and reduced employment opportunities

  • The Joseph Rowntree Foundation (2024) found that poverty rates remain high despite periods of economic growth, showing that poverty is a structural issue, not just an individual misfortune

Class & poverty

  • Working-class people are at greater risk of poverty than other social classes

  • They generally perform less well in education and find it harder to obtain secure, well-paid jobs

  • The DWP reported that median household income rose by 5% in real terms in 2024/25, but 20% of people in the UK were still in relative poverty after housing costs

  • Low pay, unemployment and job insecurity increase the likelihood of working-class families experiencing poverty — sometimes even when in work

Sociological perspectives

  • Marxists argue that low wages for the working class reflect capitalist exploitation, where the ruling class profits from cheap labour

    • E.g. during the cost-of-living crisis, real wages fell while many firms protected profits

    • Marxists argue that this is capitalism intensifying exploitation—explaining why billionaire wealth can rise even as workers struggle

    • Poverty ensures the availability of a reserve army of labour, keeping wages low and workers replaceable

  • Functionalists suggest that low-paid jobs are necessary to motivate people to strive for higher rewards — but critics argue that this justifies inequality

Ethnicity & gender

Ethnicity and poverty

  • Minority ethnic groups are more likely to experience poverty than White British households

    • DWP data shows that between April 2021 and March 2024:

      • 53% of people in Bangladeshi households and 47% in Pakistani households were in low income after housing costs

      • 39% of people in Black households were in low income, compared with 18% in White British households

  • These groups also experience deep and persistent poverty and higher rates of child poverty

  • Explanations include:

    • discrimination and racism in the labour market

    • over-representation in low-paid and insecure work

    • language barriers and lower take-up of benefits or support

Horizontal bar chart of UK low-income rates after housing costs by household-head ethnicity, 2021–2024: Bangladeshi 53%, Pakistani 47%, Other 44%, Black 39%, Asian other 38%, Chinese 36%, Mixed 28%, Indian 26%, White other 23%, White British 18%. Scale 0–55%; average 21%.
People in low-income households (after housing costs) by ethnicity of head of household, UK, April 2021 to March 2024 (Department for Work and Pensions, 2025)

Gender and poverty

  • Women are more likely to experience poverty than men due to:

    • the gender pay gap, which remains despite equality legislation

    • high representation in part-time, low-paid or caring jobs

    • being more likely to head single-parent families

    • older women living alone with small occupational pensions

  • Peter Townsend identified groups most at risk of poverty, including pensioners living alone, lone mothers and women in low-paid jobs

Sociological perspectives

  • Marxists argue that women and ethnic minorities are part of a reserve army of labour, used when needed and discarded during economic downturns

  • Weberian theorists highlight how ethnic minorities face status inequality, experiencing prejudice that limits life chances

  • Feminists argue that women’s economic disadvantage stems from patriarchy — men’s dominance in society and work

Disability & age

Disability and poverty

  • Disabled people are significantly more likely to live in poverty than non-disabled people

    • In April to June 2025, 52.8% of disabled people aged 16 to 64 were in work, compared with 82.5% of non-disabled people (DWP), and those in work faced a disability pay gap of 12.7% (ONS, 2023)

    • People with disabilities face additional costs, such as transport, care and medical expenses

    • Discrimination and inaccessibility in workplaces further reduce opportunities

  • Disabled people face economic disadvantage, isolation and exclusion — their poverty often stems from social and structural inequality, not personal ability

Age and poverty

  • Age is another important factor affecting poverty:

    • Families with young children face high living costs and childcare expenses

    • Elderly people may struggle on fixed or low pensions, especially as living costs rise

      • Pensioners who rent or rely only on state pensions are most at risk

  • In 2024/25, about 1.7 million pensioners in the UK (14%, about 1 in 7) were in relative poverty after housing costs (DWP)

  • Poverty in later life is often linked to gender — older women live longer but have smaller pensions due to career breaks and lower pay earlier in life

  • Both young and older people face financial insecurity at different life stages — young adults through low pay and housing costs, and older adults through reduced income and isolation

Sociological perspectives

  • Marxists suggest that:

    • capitalism sidelines disabled people because they are seen as less “economically productive”

    • older people are seen as “economically redundant” in capitalist societies once they retire, reducing their status and income

  • Functionalists see retirement as a normal social role transition, freeing up jobs for younger workers — but this can mask structural inequality

Unlock more, it's free!

Join the 100,000+ Students that ❤️ Save My Exams

the (exam) results speak for themselves:

Build on this topic

Raj Bonsor

Author: Raj Bonsor

Expertise: Curriculum Expert

Raj joined Save My Exams in 2024 as a Senior Curriculum Expert for Psychology & Sociology. Prior to this, she spent 15 years in the classroom, teaching hundreds of GCSE and A Level students. She has experience as Subject Leader for Psychology and Sociology, and her favourite topics to teach are research methods (especially inferential statistics!) and attachment. She has also successfully taught a number of Level 3 subjects, including criminology, health & social care, and citizenship.

Naomi Holyoak

Reviewer: Naomi Holyoak

Expertise: Biology Content Creator

Naomi graduated from the University of Oxford with a degree in Biological Sciences. She has 8 years of classroom experience teaching Key Stage 3 up to A-Level biology, and is currently a tutor and A-Level examiner. Naomi especially enjoys creating resources that enable students to build a solid understanding of subject content, while also connecting their knowledge with biology’s exciting, real-world applications.