Scientific Method: Collection of Data (Cambridge (CIE) IGCSE Environmental Management): Revision Note

Exam code: 0680

Jacque Cartwright

Written by: Jacque Cartwright

Reviewed by: Alistair Marjot

Updated on

Aims & hypothesis

  • Scientists follow a step-by-step method to make sure their data is trustworthy

  • This method helps them ask clear questions, plan fair tests, collect accurate results and make strong conclusions

  • In fieldwork, using a scientific method keeps the investigation fair, repeatable and reliable

  • Each stage builds on the one before it, like climbing a ladder to reach good scientific understanding

Suggest aims and hypotheses

  • Setting an aim gives the investigation a clear purpose, helping everyone understand what the study is trying to discover

  • A hypothesis is a testable idea, giving a prediction the investigation can prove or disprove

  • Writing a hypothesis helps focus the methods so data collected actually answers the aim

  • Hypotheses guide what variables you choose and how you measure change

Methods

  • Types of data

    • Data collected within research is primary data

    • Data collected by someone else but used in the enquiry is secondary data

    • Data which records quantities is quantitative data

    • Data which records descriptive information is qualitative data

  • Choosing a sampling strategy

    • Random or systematic sampling, helps avoid bias and makes results more representative

  • Picking sampling techniques

    • Quadrats or transects ensure data is gathered in the same way each time

  • Designing questionnaires and surveys

    • Collects people’s views clearly and consistently, improving reliability

    • Questionnaires can be used to gather a large sample of data

    • Surveys are more in-depth and tend to be used to gather a smaller data sample

      • Closed questions where answers are limited to single words, numbers or a list of options

      • Statements employ a scale to measure individuals' opinions. For example, strongly agree/agree 

      • Open questions where the respondent can give any answer

  • Carrying out a pilot study

    • This helps test the method, revealing problems early so the final investigation runs smoothly

  • Good planning reduces mistakes and increases the accuracy of the whole study

Variables

  • A variable is a factor that can be changed in an experiment

  • Identifying measured variables makes it clear what data you are collecting and how you will record it

  • Choosing control variables keeps certain conditions the same, so changes in results can be linked to the factor you are testing

  • Control variables help ensure a fair test

Independent and dependent variables

  • The independent variable is the one you change on purpose to see what effect it has

  • The dependent variable is the one you measure, showing how the independent variable affects the system

  • Think of it as cause and effect

    • An independent variable is the cause, while a dependent variable is the effect

Use of repeats and replicates

  • Repeating measurements checks that the results are consistent and not just due to chance

  • Replicates at different locations or times give a wider set of results, increasing reliability and validity

  • More repeats help spot unusual results more easily, improving accuracy

Recording data

  • Recording data clearly and neatly helps avoid mistakes later when analysing results

  • Using tables, tally charts or digital devices keeps information organised and easy to understand

  • Good recording habits reduce the risk of losing data or misreading measurements

Analysis & conclusions

  • Analysing data helps identify patterns, trends or relationships between variables

  • Using averages, graphs or percentages makes results clearer and easier to compare

  • Data analysis turns raw numbers into meaningful scientific findings

Identify and process anomalies

  • Anomalies are results that do not fit the pattern, so spotting them helps improve reliability

  • Checking whether anomalies are caused by errors or natural variation strengthens the investigation

  • Removing or explaining anomalies helps produce more accurate averages and clearer trends

Form conclusions

  • A conclusion explains what the results show and whether they support the original hypothesis

  • Linking the conclusion back to the aim helps check whether the investigation achieved its purpose

  • Conclusions point out strengths, weaknesses and improvements, helping future studies become better

Examiner Tips and Tricks

In the exam, you may be asked how valid or reliable your conclusions were. Understanding the distinction between the two is important.

  • Reliability refers to whether the results you have gathered could be reproduced in the same conditions. For example, would a student measuring water quality at the same sample site in the same conditions obtain the same measurements? 

  • Validity refers to the accuracy of the measure and whether the results represent what they are supposed to measure. For example, a measure of environmental quality should measure the environment and not economic characteristics.

Worked Example

A class wants to investigate how trampling affects plant cover in a school field

a) Suggest aims and hypotheses

  • Aim example:

    • To find out whether areas with more trampling have less plant cover

  • Hypothesis example:

    • Areas with high foot traffic will have lower plant cover because plants are damaged by frequent walking

  • Why this helps:

    • The aim gives the investigation direction and the hypothesis gives a prediction to test

b) Plan scientific methods

  • Sampling strategies

    • Example: Using random sampling by throwing a quadrat randomly across the field so every spot has an equal chance of being chosen

  • Sampling techniques

    • Example: Using a quadrat to estimate plant cover inside a 1 m² square so data is collected in the same way at each point

  • Questionnaires and surveys

    • Example: Asking students where they walk most often on the field to identify high-traffic zones

  • Pilot studies

    • Example: Testing the quadrat method in one small area first to see if plant cover is easy to estimate or if the quadrat needs a different size

    • Why this helps: The pilot shows if the method works before the real investigation starts

c) Measured and control variables

  • The percentage of plant cover inside each quadrat

  • Control variable examples

    • Using the same size quadrat every time

    • Collecting data on the same day when weather and light conditions are similar

    • Using the same person to estimate plant cover to keep the method consistent

d) Independent and dependent variables

  • Independent variable example

    • level of trampling (low, medium, high foot traffic areas)

  • Dependent variable example

    • Plant cover measured in percentage

  • Cause → effect

    • Changing the trampling level affects the amount of plant cover

e) Use of repeats and replicates

  • Repeats example:

    • Taking three readings in each area (low, medium, high trampling) to check consistency

  • Replicates example:

    • Repeating the same method in different parts of the field to reduce chance errors

  • Why this matters:

    • The more repeats you have, the more trustworthy your data becomes

f) Record data

Trampling level

Quadrat reading 1

Quadrat reading 2

Quadrat reading 3

Average plant cover

Low

80%

75%

78%

78%

Medium

50%

55%

52%

52%

High

20%

15%

18%

18%

  • Why this helps:

    • Organised tables make it easier to analyse patterns later

g) Analyse data

  • As trampling increases, plant cover declines

  • To illustrate the declining trend, students can create a line graph

  • The pattern is more evident when averages are calculated

h) Identify and process anomalies

  • In the high-trampling area, one quadrat shows 40% plant cover while the others show about 15%

  • Possible reasons:

    • Someone estimated incorrectly

    • The quadrat landed on a patch recently reseeded

  • Processing the anomaly:

    • Repeat the measurement

    • Decide whether to exclude the anomalous value if it was caused by error

i) Form conclusions

  • Plant cover is lower in areas with high trampling, which supports the hypothesis

  • The investigation shows a clear negative relationship between trampling and vegetation

  • Improvements for next time might include:

    • Using more quadrats

    • Testing on different days

    • Measuring other factors like soil moisture

Unlock more, it's free!

Join the 100,000+ Students that ❤️ Save My Exams

the (exam) results speak for themselves:

Jacque Cartwright

Author: Jacque Cartwright

Expertise: Geography Content Creator

Jacque graduated from the Open University with a BSc in Environmental Science and Geography before doing her PGCE with the University of St David’s, Swansea. Teaching is her passion and has taught across a wide range of specifications – GCSE/IGCSE and IB but particularly loves teaching the A-level Geography. For the past 5 years Jacque has been teaching online for international schools, and she knows what is needed to get the top scores on those pesky geography exams.

Alistair Marjot

Reviewer: Alistair Marjot

Expertise: Environmental Systems and Societies & Biology Content Creator

Alistair graduated from Oxford University with a degree in Biological Sciences. He has taught GCSE/IGCSE Biology, as well as Biology and Environmental Systems & Societies for the International Baccalaureate Diploma Programme. While teaching in Oxford, Alistair completed his MA Education as Head of Department for Environmental Systems & Societies. Alistair has continued to pursue his interests in ecology and environmental science, recently gaining an MSc in Wildlife Biology & Conservation with Edinburgh Napier University.