Syllabus Edition
First teaching 2025
First exams 2027
Culture & Prevalence of Smoking (DP IB Psychology): Revision Note
Cultural dimensions & smoking
Geert Hofstede, a professor at Maastricht University, surveyed over 60,000 IBM employees from 50+ countries between 1971-1973 using questionnaires on cultural attitudes and behaviours
He concluded that cultural dimensions can be used to describe universal patterns of behaviour across cultures
One of the most researched cultural dimensions is individualism vs. collectivism
Key cultural dimension: individualism vs. collectivism
Individualistic cultures
Individualistic cultures focus on ‘I/me’ rather than ‘we/us’
They value independence, competition, and personal achievement
Members of individualistic cultures may enjoy freedom and choice but risk isolation and lack of support
Individuals may see behaviours such as smoking as personal choice, even if this is against health advice
This can contribute to higher smoking prevalence, as people prioritise personal preference or independence over health guidelines
Collectivist cultures
Collectivist cultures focus on groups such as family, colleagues, or community
They value interdependence, cooperation and group harmony
Members of collectivist cultures may enjoy a sense of belonging and community but may feel reduced personal identity and autonomy
Smoking may reflect group norms (e.g., shared activities such as smoking together), which can strengthen social bonds but also reinforce unhealthy habits
In collectivist contexts, smoking may be shaped by group expectations, with individuals less likely to go against family or cultural norms that encourage tobacco use
E.g., in parts of the Middle East, the use of waterpipes (shisha) is a significant cultural practice
Evaluation of cultural dimensions
Strengths
The large-scale, global survey produced extensive quantitative data which increases the reliability and generalisability of the results
Research is regularly reviewed and updated, reducing the risk of temporal validity issues
Limitations
The findings may be reductionist as they oversimplify complex cultural behaviours into rigid and inflexible categories
Sample bias is an issue, as the IBM employees were not equally representative of all cultures
E.g., there were more employees from the USA and developed countries
Prevalence of smoking between individualistic & collectivist cultures
Prevalence rates show how common a disorder or behaviour (e.g., smoking) is within a specific population in a given time period
For smoking, prevalence is measured as the proportion of people who smoked between two dates (e.g., Jan 2021–Jan 2022)
Cognitive dissonance & smoking
Despite widespread knowledge of the serious health risks of smoking, many people continue to smoke
This creates cognitive dissonance: holding two contradictory ideas at the same time (e.g., 'smoking is harmful' vs 'I am still going to smoke')
This contradiction highlights the complexity of health behaviours and helps explain why smoking prevalence remains high in some populations
Research support for culture & prevalence of smoking
Pokhrel et al. (2018)
Aim:
To investigate how individualism/collectivism influences adolescent risky health behaviours (including smoking) and the role of social self-control in regulating these behaviours
Participants:
716 high school students (mean age of 16 years; 48.5% male, 51.5% female) from the Bashkortostan Republic, Russia (traditionally a collectivist culture)
Researchers also explored whether globalisation had encouraged more individualistic values among young Russians
Procedure:
Participants completed anonymous surveys measuring:
Risky health behaviours (e.g., smoking)
Individualism/collectivism values
Negative life events
Level of social self-control
Results:
Participants who scored highest on individualism reported the lowest rates of risky behaviours, including smoking
Conclusion:
The cultural dimension of individualism vs. collectivism is a reliable predictor of smoking prevalence among Russian adolescents
This suggests that cultural values and globalisation may shape health behaviours in complex ways
Link to concepts
Responsibility
Research on smoking is socially sensitive, the results of which could be used to stereotype or discriminate against specific social/cultural groups
The results of research findings in this field should be reported carefully with researcher reflexivity as a priority
Change
Prevalence rates of smoking may change for the better because of globalisation
Western media output (e.g., films, music videos, social influencers) rarely depict smoking as a desirable or fashionable choice which could impact the prevalence of smoking across a younger global audience
Unlock more, it's free!
Did this page help you?