Syllabus Edition
First teaching 2025
First exams 2027
The Effects of Poverty in Childhood (DP IB Psychology): Revision Note
The effects of poverty in childhood
Prevalence of Poverty
According to the Global Multidimensional Poverty Statistics (2022), approximately 9.2% of the world's population (700 million people) live in extreme poverty
This is defined as living on less than $1.90 per day
Around 26% of the world's population (1.3 billion people) live in moderate poverty
This is defined as living on $1.90-$3.20 per day
At least 80% of the world's population lives on less than $10 a day
Impact on children
Poverty has a more devastating effect on children than adults because their development depends on consistent access to:
basic needs: clean water, nutritious food, adequate shelter
stimulation: educational resources, play, parental engagement
Growing up in poverty strongly predicts adult poverty, reinforcing cycles of disadvantage
Developmental consequences
Health: Poor nutrition leads to undernourishment (lack of food) or malnourishment (poor quality/low variety diet, e.g., junk food, heavily processed white bread)
Education: Children in poverty may miss out on enriching experiences such as:
trips, hobbies, or extracurricular activities
parents reading to them or encouraging learning
Wellbeing: Lack of stimulation, instability, and stress undermine both emotional security and cognitive development
Research which supports the effects of poverty in childhood
Kar et al. (2008)
Aim:
To investigate the effect of poverty and malnutrition on children's cognitive performance
Participants:
40 children aged 5-7 years and 8-10 years from Bangalore, India
20 of the children were identified as being ‘adequately nourished'
20 were identified as ‘malnourished’
Procedure:
The children underwent a series of tests designed to assess their neuropsychological functioning
The tests assessed:
their motor speed (finger-tapping test)
their attention span (a test in which they had to trail two colours)
their executive functioning (naming items beginning with the same letter)
their visual-spatial ability (completing an object with a missing part)
their comprehension (understanding verbal commands)
their memory (recalling abstract designs)
Results:
Children identified as malnourished performed worse on most tests, with the exception of motor speed (the least cognitively demanding measure)
They showed significant impairments on tests of higher cognitive functions, including:
attention
working memory
verbal comprehension
Malnourished children also demonstrated delays in key developmental markers of mature cognition, particularly in executive functions such as:
planning ahead
decision-making
impulse control
Conclusion:
Malnourished children experience cognitive impairments and developmental delays compared to adequately nourished children
Their cognitive development may follow an altered or delayed trajectory, particularly in areas such as attention, memory, language, and executive functioning
Evaluation of the effects of poverty in childhood
Strengths
Research into the effects of poverty has genuine usefulness: its findings could be used to help combat the negative impact of the effects of poverty, e.g., malnutrition, as interventions to help those in need
Kar's findings could be used to persuade governments to implement programmes such as breakfast clubs in schools and food banks to ensure that no child is malnourished
Limitations
Attempting to tackle poverty is a huge global issue which requires governments and agencies to work productively together
It is possible that the malnourished children in Kar's study might have experienced fatigue or some distress carrying out so many tests
This is an ethical consideration which the researchers should be mindful of when conducting research with vulnerable participants
Link to concepts
Responsibility
Conducting research into the effects of poverty is a highly delicate and sensitive issue
Those living in poverty should not be portrayed as 'poor', 'needy' or in any way inferior to the rest of the population
Researchers must use reflexivity when conducting research such as Kar's
Are they bringing their own bias or preconceived ideas to the research?
Have they made assumptions about the issue and those affected by it before the research process has even begun?
There may be a temptation for researchers to assume a 'saviour' mode in highlighting global inequalities, which is something that they should constantly check for to avoid the researcher effect
Measurement
The different types of tests used in Kar's research measured a range of variables
This is known as method triangulation, which helps to preserve the internal validity of the study and to avoid possible bias (which could be the case if only one method for obtaining data was used)
Unlock more, it's free!
Did this page help you?