Syllabus Edition
First teaching 2025
First exams 2027
Self-Disclosure & Relationships (DP IB Psychology): Revision Note
Self-disclosure
Self-disclosure is the act of revealing personal information about the self to another person
It plays an important role in attraction and relationship development
Factors influencing self-disclosure
The nature of self-disclosure and how much is revealed will depend on a number of factors:
Recipient: the person to whom the details are disclosed, e.g., a romantic partner
The stage of the relationship:
in the first few weeks disclosure is limited
after several months disclosure becomes deeper
after several years, disclosure continues, contributing to relationship maintenance
Person disclosing: individual characteristics affect what and how much is revealed
Nature of information:
Superficial details: e.g., 'I went to St Freud’s school'
Sensitive details: e.g., 'I have spent time in prison'
Reasons for disclosure:
To build trust and intimacy.
To encourage reciprocity, i.e., the partner sharing in return
Self-disclosure is not fixed; it varies with age, relationship status, profession, mood, and context
Social penetration theory
Social penetration theory (SPT), suggested by Altman & Taylor (1973), describes self-disclosure as a gradual process, starting shallow and moving deeper
Relationship development is like peeling back layers of an onion: as layers are removed, intimacy increases

Figure 1: Social Penetration Theory
Levels of disclosure:
Superficial: facts like where someone lives, their job, and hobbies (breadth, little depth)
Intimate: ambitions, past relationships, family conflicts
Personal: hopes, desires, mistakes, insecurities
Core: deeply private issues (fears, guilt, secrets that risk rejection)
As disclosure deepens, the relationship becomes stronger and more intimate
Self-disclosure & romantic relationships
Self-disclosure may be one of the most important ways of establishing and maintaining a romantic relationship because:
self-disclosing involves trust
self-disclosure increases liking, which in turn can lead to intimacy
without self-disclosure, the relationship would stagnate at a superficial level
Research which supports self-disclosure & relationships
Collins & Miller (1994)
Aim:
To investigate the link between self-disclosure and liking in the maintenance of relationships
Procedure:
A meta-analysis of research in the field of self-disclosure
Studies were selected from range of journal articles published between 1955 and 1992, isolating the key terms linked to self-disclosure and liking
Studies from a variety of academic textbooks were also included in the sample
A statistical programme was used to calculate the effect size in studies of self-disclosure in relationships.
Studies in the meta-analysis included lab experiments through to self-reports
Results:
Liking appeared to be associated with self-disclosure (seen via positive correlations and large effect sizes)
The effect was particularly strong in self-report studies (questionnaires)
Intimacy was also linked to liking:
people will disclose more to those to whom they already feel close and the very act of disclosing increases liking
Conclusion:
Self-disclosure plays an important role in the maintenance of relationships
Evaluation of self-disclosure & relationships
Strengths
Research into self-disclosure has good application
It could be used to inform relationship counselling
The mechanisms of self-disclosure apply to many different types of relationships
E.g., friendships, work relationships, family
This means that there is good external validity to the idea that self-disclosure is a key factor in establishing and maintaining relationships
Limitations
There is a lack of ecological validity with self-disclosure research such as the above study:
A meta-analysis is a ‘cold’ and detached statistical measure which cannot reveal why and how self-disclosure takes place, only that it does
Self-disclosure is a difficult variable to measure, as it is highly subjective and prone to change
Link to concepts
Measurement
The above study uses a meta-analysis which involves triangulation of method and data
This means that the findings from one study can be viewed in the light of the findings from other studies
Using triangulation in this way increases the internal validity and the reliability of the findings, as one finding checks the other findings (truth and consistency)
Meta-analyses use secondary data which offers fewer opportunities to confound the results at source, as the researcher analyses the findings of existing studies
Secondary data, however, is less secure than primary data
The researchers are at the mercy of the original researchers’ procedures, over which they have no control, potentially affecting the reliability of the findings
Bias
Self-disclosure in relationships may not align with the values of collectivist cultures, as such cultures emphasise the group over the individual
Collectivist cultures may not feel comfortable with the idea that one 'peels away' layers of the self to reveal the most personal and intimate information to their partner
Engaging in such behaviour may actually damage the relationship
More emic research should be conducted in this field so that no universal conclusions (culture bias) are made about the role of self-disclosure in relationships
Unlock more, it's free!
Did this page help you?