Syllabus Edition

First teaching 2025

First exams 2027

Transferability & Credibility (DP IB Psychology): Revision Note

Claire Neeson

Written by: Claire Neeson

Reviewed by: Raj Bonsor

Updated on

Transferability & Credibility

  • Transferability is a type of generalisability used specifically with qualitative data

    • It refers to the extent to which a study's findings can be applied/generalised to other populations/contexts outside of the study's parameters

  • The aim is not statistical generalisation but to ensure that findings resonate with readers by providing rich insight and detail

  • Good transferability evokes a sense of familiarity and shared understanding of the experience described

    • This may happen easily for topics which are more common among a wider population (e.g., school days)

    • The findings are less likely to be transferable if the topic/experience is more 'niche' ) or idiosyncratic (e.g., becoming a refugee)

    • Research which is outdated may not transfer easily to modern contexts, which is something for researchers to consider as well

  • To ensure transferability, researchers should fully describe

    • the methods (e.g., interview type, structured/unstructured)

    • sampling (how participants were obtained, why selected)

    • procedure (how the study was conducted, materials used, recording methods)

    • analysis (how data were analysed, why that method was chosen)

    • findings (how they relate to and support the theory being investigated)

Credibility

  • Credibility is the qualitative equivalent of reliability

  • Since qualitative research often uses small samples and non-replicable methods, reliability is reframed as trustworthiness and believability

  • A credible study:

    • transparently explains methods and materials used

    • demonstrates the competence and integrity of the researcher

    • is published after scrutiny (e.g., peer review)

Ways to enhance credibility

  • Triangulation:

    • One dataset checks another for consistency (e.g., interview transcript vs. questionnaire responses).

    • One researcher checks interpretations with another (agreement on design, coding, or findings).

  • Researcher reflexivity:

    • Honest reflection in the discussion section on both strengths and weaknesses

    • Transparency about limitations increases trustworthiness

Unlock more, it's free!

Join the 100,000+ Students that ❤️ Save My Exams

the (exam) results speak for themselves:

Claire Neeson

Author: Claire Neeson

Expertise: Psychology Content Creator

Claire has been teaching for 34 years, in the UK and overseas. She has taught GCSE, A-level and IB Psychology which has been a lot of fun and extremely exhausting! Claire is now a freelance Psychology teacher and content creator, producing textbooks, revision notes and (hopefully) exciting and interactive teaching materials for use in the classroom and for exam prep. Her passion (apart from Psychology of course) is roller skating and when she is not working (or watching 'Coronation Street') she can be found busting some impressive moves on her local roller rink.

Raj Bonsor

Reviewer: Raj Bonsor

Expertise: Psychology & Sociology Content Creator

Raj joined Save My Exams in 2024 as a Senior Content Creator for Psychology & Sociology. Prior to this, she spent fifteen years in the classroom, teaching hundreds of GCSE and A Level students. She has experience as Subject Leader for Psychology and Sociology, and her favourite topics to teach are research methods (especially inferential statistics!) and attachment. She has also successfully taught a number of Level 3 subjects, including criminology, health & social care, and citizenship.