Theoretical Factors Affecting Choice of Methods (WJEC Eduqas GCSE Sociology): Revision Note

Exam code: C200

Raj Bonsor

Written by: Raj Bonsor

Reviewed by: Cara Head

Updated on

Positivism versus interpretivism

  • One of the key stages of planning research is deciding which method(s) to use

  • Some of the research methods available to sociologists include:

    • questionnaires

    • interviews

    • observations

    • content analysis

  • The method(s) sociologists decide to use are influenced by:

    • practical issues, e.g., time and money available

    • ethical issues, e.g., informed consent, confidentiality and data protection

    • theoretical issues, e.g., the debate about positivism and interpretivism

Differences between positivism and interpretivism

Positivism

Interpretivism

Scientific vs non-scientific methods

The only way to obtain knowledge about the world is through scientific methods like those natural scientists use. Positivists prefer a scientific approach to studying the social world, i.e., developing hypotheses and testing them to discover the facts.

Interpretivists believe that sociologists should use non-scientific methods to study the social world. This is because people are completely different from the subject matter studied in the natural sciences, so scientific methods are inappropriate.

How they aim to understand behaviour

Positivists focus on behaviour that can be observed and measured rather than on people's feelings or emotions

Interpretivists like to explore people's behaviour and intentions and understand the meaning behind their behaviour.

Research methods preferred

Positivists prefer research methods such as large-scale surveys; these are known as quantitative methods as they gather facts and figures to describe society in statistical terms.

Interpretivists prefer research methods such as in-depth interviews and participant observation; these are qualitative methods as they collect rich, detailed accounts rather than statistics.

Criticisms

Critics argue that scientific methods can't be applied to sociology because people are completely different from the things studied in the natural sciences.

It is difficult to achieve objectivity in research, as the researcher's own beliefs, interpretations, and cultural preferences can affect the research outcomes.

The mixed methods approach

  • Today, the distinction between quantitative and qualitative methods is less rigid

  • Sociologists recognise that both types of data can be combined to gain a deeper understanding of society

  • A mixed methods approach allows researchers to collect numerical (quantitative) data and detailed (qualitative) data within the same study

  • This combination is sometimes called triangulation, as it helps researchers cross-check their findings and increase validity and reliability

Studies using mixed methods

  • Mac an Ghaill researched African-Caribbean boys in schools and youth groups

    • He used interviews and observations (qualitative) and backed these up with statistical data (quantitative) from schools

    • This helped confirm that the boys’ experiences matched official data — both methods supported each other

  • Eileen Barker studied a religious group called the Moonies

    • After observing members and interviewing them in depth, she designed a questionnaire to collect quantitative data

    • This helped her test whether her qualitative findings were consistent on a larger scale

Evaluation of the mixed methods approach

Strengths

  • Mixed methods give a richer and more rounded picture of social life, as they combine numbers with personal meanings and experiences

  • They increase validity, as findings from one method can be checked against another to produce more trustworthy results than using only one method

  • They allow researchers to see patterns and explanations behind the data — for example, why certain statistical trends occur

  • They can be used to check whether results from one method support or challenge findings from another

Criticisms

  • Using multiple methods can be time-consuming and expensive, and the data from one method may dominate or even contradict the other methods

  • The data from one method, e.g., official statistics, may dominate the research

Unlock more, it's free!

Join the 100,000+ Students that ❤️ Save My Exams

the (exam) results speak for themselves:

Raj Bonsor

Author: Raj Bonsor

Expertise: Psychology & Sociology Content Creator

Raj joined Save My Exams in 2024 as a Senior Content Creator for Psychology & Sociology. Prior to this, she spent fifteen years in the classroom, teaching hundreds of GCSE and A Level students. She has experience as Subject Leader for Psychology and Sociology, and her favourite topics to teach are research methods (especially inferential statistics!) and attachment. She has also successfully taught a number of Level 3 subjects, including criminology, health & social care, and citizenship.

Cara Head

Reviewer: Cara Head

Expertise: Biology & Psychology Content Creator

Cara graduated from the University of Exeter in 2005 with a degree in Biological Sciences. She has fifteen years of experience teaching the Sciences at KS3 to KS5, and Psychology at A-Level. Cara has taught in a range of secondary schools across the South West of England before joining the team at SME. Cara is passionate about Biology and creating resources that bring the subject alive and deepen students' understanding