Natural Sciences & Knowledge (DP IB Theory of Knowledge): Revision Note
Natural sciences & knowledge
The natural sciences study the natural world, aiming to produce justified explanations and predictions based on observation and testing
Natural science subjects include:
biology
chemistry
physics
geology
astronomy
Scientific claims focus on patterns and relationships that can be investigated using evidence from the physical world
The culture of scientism (highkly valuinga nd trusting scientific knowledge) someties equates knowledge in the Natural Sciences with certainty
Scientific conclusions can change when new evidence is found or alternative methods are used
Scientific claims are always judged by how well they fit evidence and survive testing
Scientific questions vs non-scientific questions
A scientific question is one that can be investigated using observation or measurements, while non-scientific questions are not testable, e.g. because they are concerned with values, meaning or purpose
The scientific question “Which treatment reduces blood pressure more?” is testable with data
The non-scientific question “Is it morally acceptable to use animals in testing?” requires ethical reasoning
Laws, theories and models
Evaluating scientific knowledge involves judging how well laws, theories, and models fit the evidence and how effectively they predict new observations
Scientific law: description of a consistent pattern or relationship in nature, often summarised in a general statement or equation
Scientific theory: a well-supported explanation of why a pattern happens; a theory should be built from multiple lines of evidence and be able to generate predictions
Scientific model: a simplified representation used to explain, predict or test ideas when the real system is too complex to work with directly
Limits of scientific inquiry
The natural sciences are limited in their scope, e.g.:
scientific inquiry is limited to questions that can be investigated with evidence from the natural world
practical constraints, such as measurement limits, technology, cost and ethical restrictions, may limit which experiments are possible
scientific conclusions are limited by assumptions in methods and models, so results may not transfer to different conditions
Recognising limits supports better justification because it prevents overstating what the evidence shows
Unlock more, it's free!
Was this revision note helpful?