Motivation in the Workplace (DP IB Psychology): Revision Note

Here is an example of a Paper 3 source and a 3-mark SAQ using motivation (HL extension) in the Human Relationships context:

Source 1

Q1. Explain one limitation linked to the interpretation of the data in source 1.

[3 marks]

Model answer:

One limitation is that there is a lack of clarity in the graph. More specific and precise labelling of the bars in the x-axis would help to understand motivation in the workplace, i.e., what is meant by 'others'? The same lack of clarity concerns the term 'praise', as the graph does not indicate what form this praise takes.

or

Measuring motivation via quantitative methods lacks explanatory power: 46% of employees stated that praise from the managing director is most sought after but the graph cannot say why employees feel this way. Qualitative data should accompany this graph to add validity to the findings.

Guidance

• Use only the information provided by the graph/chart: do not 'invent' data or make assumptions as to what may be behind the data, e.g., what the VRET consisted of or your own opinions on VRET generally

• Do not write too much – there are only 3 marks available for this question and you need time to complete the higher-value questions on this paper

• The question is asking for one limitation so don't provide two or more, as you will not be rewarded for this

• The question is asking for what limits interpretation of the data so don't waste time/marks by stating any advantages/strengths