The Social Learning Theory of Criminality (OCR GCSE Psychology): Revision Note
Exam code: J203
Social learning theory
Social learning theory (SLT), proposed by Albert Bandura, explains that we learn behaviour through observation and imitation of others
Individuals may turn to crime after observing others being rewarded for similar behaviours
Identification with role models
People are more likely to imitate those they admire or respect — known as role models
Role models can include:
parents
siblings
peers
celebrities
media characters
Through the process of identification, individuals decide they want to be like the role model and adopt their attitudes or behaviours
E.g. a teenager might identify with a gangster character in a film and start copying their behaviour
Observation and imitation
Behaviour is learned by watching others and then imitating what they do
People observe how others behave and the consequences of their actions, deciding whether to copy them
E.g. a child who sees an older sibling shoplifting and not getting caught may imitate this behaviour
Vicarious reinforcement
Vicarious reinforcement occurs when someone observes another person being rewarded for a behaviour
The observer learns that this behaviour leads to positive outcomes and is more likely to imitate it
E.g. seeing a criminal gain money or status without punishment may encourage others to commit similar crimes
This helps explain how media coverage and peer approval can reinforce criminal behaviour
Direct reinforcement
Once the behaviour is imitated, it may be directly reinforced if the individual receives a reward
Rewards can be material (money) or social (respect, approval)
If the behaviour produces positive outcomes, it is strengthened and more likely to be repeated
E.g. a person who gains popularity for vandalising property may continue doing it for attention
Internalisation
With repeated reinforcement, a behaviour can become internalised — part of a person’s beliefs or identity
Once this happens, the behaviour continues even without external rewards
E.g. a person who has long engaged in criminal activity may continue offending even when it no longer benefits them
Criticisms of social learning theory
Ignores the role of nature
SLT focuses on nurture and overlooks biological influences (nature)
Some psychologists argue there may be a ‘criminal gene’ or brain abnormalities that predispose people to crime
Most psychologists agree that both nature and nurture interact, with biological factors influencing how easily someone learns criminal behaviour
Does not explain how crime starts
The theory assumes criminals learn from others, but it doesn’t explain where the first criminal behaviours originate
Cannot explain crime without exposure to role models
Some offenders come from law-abiding families with no criminal influences, suggesting biological or individual factors may play a role
Not all people learn from observation
Many people observe crime but do not imitate it, suggesting factors like morality, empathy, or self-control also influence behaviour
Punishment doesn't always work
SLT predicts that punishment should reduce crime, yet many reoffend despite punishment
This suggests other influences, such as addiction or personality traits, may be involved
Examiner Tips and Tricks
Avoid the common error of confusing the two types of reinforcement by focusing on who receives the reward.
Vicarious reinforcement is where you observe someone else being rewarded for a behaviour
Direct reinforcement is where you are personally rewarded for performing a behaviour
Ensure you clearly differentiate between these two concepts in your answers.
Unlock more, it's free!
Did this page help you?