The Theory of Reconstructive Memory (OCR GCSE Psychology): Revision Note
Exam code: J203
Schemas
Reconstructive memory suggests that our memory is influenced by prior experiences and beliefs, meaning it is not an exact copy of what actually happened
Memory is not like a camera
It does not record events exactly as they happen
Instead, it is reconstructed from fragments and influenced by prior experiences, beliefs, and expectations
Bartlett (1932) proposed that memory is an active process, guided by internal frameworks called schemas
A schema is a mental representation based on previous experience
E.g. your idea of a 'birthday party' might include cake, presents, and balloons
Schemas help us make sense of new information by fitting it into what we already know
New details are understood through existing schemas, making unfamiliar events more meaningful
However, this can also lead to distortions if new information doesn’t match what we expect
Bartlett described memory as a reconstruction of past reactions or experiences, rather than a literal replay of events
Memory is flexible and may change depending on what is most meaningful at the time of recall
Recall doesn't necessarily occur in a chronological order — details are pieced together to form a coherent story
The role of experience and expectation on memory
Our perceptions and recall are shaped by what we have experienced before
Prior experiences lead us to expect certain outcomes
When an event doesn’t match those expectations, we unconsciously alter or omit details to make it fit our schema
E.g. if a teacher looks strict, a student might assume they are unkind
Over time, new experiences update the schema once the student realises the teacher is friendly
Bartlett argued that memories are reconstructions, often merging elements of several events to create one coherent narrative
This explains why two people can recall the same event differently
Each uses their own schemas and expectations to interpret it
Confabulation & leading questions
Confabulation occurs when people fill in gaps in memory with made-up details to make a story more complete
It is not lying — people genuinely believe these details are correct
Bartlett proposed that confabulation happens because we use parts of other memories or schemas to make a fragmented memory seem whole
This helps to create a more consistent reconstruction of events, even if it is inaccurate
Distortion and the effect of leading questions
Memory distortion occurs when the recall of an event differs from what actually happened
Leading questions can manipulate memory by suggesting false details
E.g. Loftus & Palmer (1974) found that participants who were asked, “How fast were the cars going when they smashed?” estimated higher speeds than those who were asked, “How fast were the cars going when they contacted?”
The verb used altered participants’ reconstructed memories of the crash
This shows that post-event information and language can shape how we remember events
Criticisms of the theory of reconstructive memory
Reductionist
The theory focuses on schemas and reconstruction but ignores biological processes, such as how memories are stored and retrieved in the brain
A more holistic approach would recognise that memory relies on multiple interconnected systems, not just schemas
Lack of systematic research
Bartlett’s own studies (e.g. War of the Ghosts) lacked standardised instructions and controls, so that extraneous variables may have affected results
Therefore, the research doesn't offer valid support for the theory
Schemas are unobservable
Critics argue the concept is too vague and hypothetical
Schemas cannot be directly measured or seen on brain scans, making them difficult to study scientifically
Overly complicated
The reconstructive model makes it hard to predict exactly what people will remember, as each person’s schemas and experiences are unique
This makes memory very difficult to test
Unlock more, it's free!
Did this page help you?