Experiments: Types of Experiment (OCR GCSE Psychology): Revision Note
Exam code: J203
Laboratory experiments
A laboratory experiment is carried out in a controlled environment where the researcher directly manipulates the IV
The researcher can control extraneous variables such as noise, temperature, and lighting to ensure the IV is the only variable affecting the DV
A standardised procedure is used so that all participants experience the same conditions (except for the IV), e.g.
equal numbers of participants in each condition
the same instructions given to all participants
the same materials and timings used across conditions
Evaluation of laboratory experiments
Strengths
High control of variables helps establish cause and effect
Standardised procedures make results replicable and reliable
Objectivity is increased because researcher influence is minimised
Weaknesses
Low ecological validity — the artificial environment doesn’t reflect real life
Demand characteristics — participants may change their behaviour if they guess the study’s aim, affecting validity
Field experiments
A field experiment takes place in a natural environment (e.g. a classroom, park, or workplace) rather than an artificial controlled environment
The environment is realistic, so participants may behave more naturally
The researcher still manipulates the IV, but there is less control over extraneous variables
E.g., a researcher runs a Kindness Programme in a school
IV: Whether students participate in the kindness programme or not
DV: Scores on a questionnaire measuring prosocial behaviour after one month
Researchers might also gather qualitative data (e.g. interviews with teachers or observations of student behaviour) to support their quantitative results
Evaluation of field experiments
Strengths
Higher ecological validity than laboratory experiments, as the setting is natural
Less chance of demand characteristics due to the realistic and natural setting, improving validity
Weaknesses
Less control over extraneous variables compared to laboratory experiments lowers validity
Possible ethical issues, as participants might not give informed consent if they don't know they are part of a study
Natural experiments
In a natural experiment, the IV is not manipulated by the researcher — it occurs naturally
The researcher measures the effect of this naturally occurring IV on the DV
Participants cannot be randomly assigned to conditions, as they are often defined by the IV itself (e.g. age, gender, or life circumstance)
Examples include:
comparing memory span between young and older adults.
comparing emotional intelligence between boys and girls.
comparing people with depression and those without
Evaluation of natural experiments
Strengths
Allows researchers to study variables that would be unethical or impossible to manipulate (e.g., trauma, gender, adoption)
Often have good ecological validity, as they study real-world differences that occur naturally
Weaknesses
Cause and effect are difficult to establish because variables are not directly controlled
Replication is hard — naturally occurring variables (e.g., age, gender, life events) cannot be repeated or recreated
Examiner Tips and Tricks
It is important to know the difference between a field and a natural experiment. Focus on where the independent variable (IV) comes from. If the researcher creates or changes the IV, it’s a field experiment. If the IV already exists naturally (e.g., a participant already has depression), it’s a natural experiment.
Unlock more, it's free!
Did this page help you?