The Effect of Situational Factors on Collective & Crowd Behaviour (OCR GCSE Psychology): Revision Note
Exam code: J203
Collective and crowd behaviour
People often behave differently in groups or crowds than they do when alone
These changes in behaviour can be explained by situational factors, such as:
the presence of others
deindividuation
cultural influences
Collective behaviour refers to the actions of two or more individuals acting together for a common purpose
When individuals become part of a crowd, their behaviour can be strongly influenced by others around them
Le Bon (1896) argued that people in crowds lose their sense of self, responsibility, and morality — behaving instinctively as part of a group mentality
This can lead to impulsive or aggressive actions that individuals would not usually consider when alone
However, Reicher (1984) suggested a more positive explanation
He proposed that crowds act based on a shared social identity — a common background, culture, or purpose
E.g. during the 1980 St Paul’s riots, Reicher found that while rioters attacked police cars (the 'out-group'), they avoided harming local residents or damaging small businesses (the 'in-group')
This shows that crowd behaviour can still be controlled and purposeful rather than purely chaotic
Deindividuation
Deindividuation occurs when people in a crowd lose their sense of individuality and personal responsibility
This can make them feel anonymous and less accountable for their actions
As a result, they may act in ways they normally wouldn’t when they are on their own
E.g. being more aggressive or destructive than normal
Situational triggers for deindividuation include:
large crowds: make individuals feel anonymous and harder to identify
uniforms, masks or similar clothing: reduce self-awareness and increase feelings of belonging to the group
heightened emotions: excitement or anger can spread quickly through the crowd
Prentice-Dunn and Rogers (1989) suggested that when people lose self-awareness, they also stop worrying about consequences
This can lead to anti-social acts like vandalism or violence
However, deindividuation doesn’t always lead to negative outcomes
In some cases, it can result in pro-social behaviour, such as helping others during emergencies when people act together with a shared purpose
Culture on pro-social & anti-social behaviour
Cultural factors also influence how people behave in groups
Psychologists often compare collectivist and individualist cultures to explain differences in crowd and collective behaviour
Collectivist cultures (e.g. Mexico, Kenya, the Philippines):
emphasise the needs of the group over the individual
encourage cooperation, sharing, and helping others
are associated with higher levels of pro-social behaviour
e.g. altruism and helping family or community members
Individualist cultures (e.g. the USA, UK):
focus on personal success and independence
may show less group-oriented behaviour and lower levels of pro-social acts
are sometimes associated with more anti-social behaviour
e.g. when competition or inequality is high
Research by Whiting and Whiting (1975) found that children raised in collectivist cultures were more pro-social than those in individualist cultures
Kenyan children helped more with household chores and looked after younger siblings compared to American children
Moghaddam (1993) found that people raised in communal environments, such as a kibbutz, were more likely to help others and share resources
Nadler (1986) found that children brought up on a Kibbutz were much more likely to give help to others compared to children brought up in a city environment
In contrast, the 2010 Gallup World Poll and Piotrowska et al. (2015) found that countries with high income inequality tend to have higher levels of anti-social behaviour
This suggests that social inequality is a situational factor that can increase frustration and reduce social cooperation
Unlock more, it's free!
Did this page help you?