The Effect of Situational Factors on Collective & Crowd Behaviour (OCR GCSE Psychology): Revision Note

Exam code: J203

Raj Bonsor

Last updated

Collective and crowd behaviour

  • People often behave differently in groups or crowds than they do when alone

  • These changes in behaviour can be explained by situational factors, such as:

    • the presence of others

    • deindividuation

    • cultural influences

  • Collective behaviour refers to the actions of two or more individuals acting together for a common purpose

    • When individuals become part of a crowd, their behaviour can be strongly influenced by others around them

  • Le Bon (1896) argued that people in crowds lose their sense of self, responsibility, and morality — behaving instinctively as part of a group mentality

    • This can lead to impulsive or aggressive actions that individuals would not usually consider when alone

  • However, Reicher (1984) suggested a more positive explanation

  • He proposed that crowds act based on a shared social identity — a common background, culture, or purpose

    • E.g. during the 1980 St Paul’s riots, Reicher found that while rioters attacked police cars (the 'out-group'), they avoided harming local residents or damaging small businesses (the 'in-group')

  • This shows that crowd behaviour can still be controlled and purposeful rather than purely chaotic

Deindividuation

  • Deindividuation occurs when people in a crowd lose their sense of individuality and personal responsibility

    • This can make them feel anonymous and less accountable for their actions

  • As a result, they may act in ways they normally wouldn’t when they are on their own

    • E.g. being more aggressive or destructive than normal

  • Situational triggers for deindividuation include:

    • large crowds: make individuals feel anonymous and harder to identify

    • uniforms, masks or similar clothing: reduce self-awareness and increase feelings of belonging to the group

    • heightened emotions: excitement or anger can spread quickly through the crowd

  • Prentice-Dunn and Rogers (1989) suggested that when people lose self-awareness, they also stop worrying about consequences

    • This can lead to anti-social acts like vandalism or violence

  • However, deindividuation doesn’t always lead to negative outcomes

  • In some cases, it can result in pro-social behaviour, such as helping others during emergencies when people act together with a shared purpose

Culture on pro-social & anti-social behaviour

  • Cultural factors also influence how people behave in groups

    • Psychologists often compare collectivist and individualist cultures to explain differences in crowd and collective behaviour

  • Collectivist cultures (e.g. Mexico, Kenya, the Philippines):

    • emphasise the needs of the group over the individual

    • encourage cooperation, sharing, and helping others

    • are associated with higher levels of pro-social behaviour

      • e.g. altruism and helping family or community members

  • Individualist cultures (e.g. the USA, UK):

    • focus on personal success and independence

    • may show less group-oriented behaviour and lower levels of pro-social acts

    • are sometimes associated with more anti-social behaviour

      • e.g. when competition or inequality is high

  • Research by Whiting and Whiting (1975) found that children raised in collectivist cultures were more pro-social than those in individualist cultures

    • Kenyan children helped more with household chores and looked after younger siblings compared to American children

  • Moghaddam (1993) found that people raised in communal environments, such as a kibbutz, were more likely to help others and share resources

    • Nadler (1986) found that children brought up on a Kibbutz were much more likely to give help to others compared to children brought up in a city environment

  • In contrast, the 2010 Gallup World Poll and Piotrowska et al. (2015) found that countries with high income inequality tend to have higher levels of anti-social behaviour

  • This suggests that social inequality is a situational factor that can increase frustration and reduce social cooperation

Unlock more, it's free!

Join the 100,000+ Students that ❤️ Save My Exams

the (exam) results speak for themselves:

Raj Bonsor

Author: Raj Bonsor

Expertise: Psychology & Sociology Content Creator

Raj joined Save My Exams in 2024 as a Senior Content Creator for Psychology & Sociology. Prior to this, she spent fifteen years in the classroom, teaching hundreds of GCSE and A Level students. She has experience as Subject Leader for Psychology and Sociology, and her favourite topics to teach are research methods (especially inferential statistics!) and attachment. She has also successfully taught a number of Level 3 subjects, including criminology, health & social care, and citizenship.