Exam code: 9FM0
1/240Still learning
Know0
The ellipse has general point
. What are the two ways of finding the gradient of the tangent there?
Implicit differentiation of the Cartesian equation, then substituting and
into the result.
Or parametric differentiation of the two parametric equations, which reaches the same gradient without touching the Cartesian form at all.

Join for free to unlock a full flashcard set, track what you know,
and turn revision into real progress.
You have the gradient of the tangent to an ellipse at
. What do you do with it next?
Substitute it, along with and
, into the straight-line equation
.
Then simplify, which for an ellipse means clearing the fractions and using to collapse the constant term.
Fill in the condition for the line to be a tangent to the ellipse
:
The completed condition is:
The left-hand side is always positive, so every gradient gives two tangents, one with
positive and one with
negative, on opposite sides of the ellipse.
Was this flashcard helpful?
The ellipse has general point
. What are the two ways of finding the gradient of the tangent there?
Implicit differentiation of the Cartesian equation, then substituting and
into the result.
Or parametric differentiation of the two parametric equations, which reaches the same gradient without touching the Cartesian form at all.
You have the gradient of the tangent to an ellipse at
. What do you do with it next?
Substitute it, along with and
, into the straight-line equation
.
Then simplify, which for an ellipse means clearing the fractions and using to collapse the constant term.
Fill in the condition for the line to be a tangent to the ellipse
:
The completed condition is:
The left-hand side is always positive, so every gradient gives two tangents, one with
positive and one with
negative, on opposite sides of the ellipse.
How do you prove that a line is a tangent to an ellipse only when a particular condition on
and
holds?
Substitute the line into the ellipse's equation and rearrange into a quadratic in , whose roots are the
-coordinates of the points of intersection.
A tangent touches only once, so force the discriminant to be zero, and simplifying what is left gives the condition.
True or False?
The method of substituting a gradient into works at every point of an ellipse.
False.
At the two ends of the major axis, , the tangent is vertical, and that straight-line form cannot represent a vertical line at all.
Write those two tangents down directly as and
instead of trying to compute a gradient for them.
How does finding the normal to an ellipse differ from finding the tangent?
In exactly one place: having found the tangent's gradient you take its negative reciprocal, and use that in instead.
Every other step, including the point you substitute and the identity used to tidy the result, is unchanged.
At the tangent to an ellipse is
. Why is the right-hand side just
, with no
in it?
Because the two terms that land there combine as .
That bracket is equal to , so the whole right-hand side collapses to a constant, which is exactly the job the identity is doing.
How does implicit differentiation of give the gradient of the tangent at
?
Differentiating gives , so substituting
leaves
.
The cancels from both sides and the gradient is simply
.
Fill in the condition for the line to be a tangent to the parabola
:
The completed condition is:
So for a given gradient there is exactly one tangent to the parabola, the line whose intercept is
.
True or False?
The tangent to the parabola at its vertex is the line
.
False.
The tangent at the vertex is the vertical line
, which is the
-axis.
The line is the parabola's axis of symmetry, and it cuts straight through the curve rather than touching it.
The tangent to at
has gradient
. What is the gradient of the normal there, and what equation does it lead to?
The normal's gradient is , the negative reciprocal of
.
Substituting that with and
and simplifying gives
.
Why does simplifying the tangent to a parabola need no trigonometric or hyperbolic identity, when the other conics do?
Because the parabola's parameter is not an angle: and
are polynomials, so the algebra closes on its own.
The other conics are parametrised with and
, or with
and
, and need an identity to collapse the terms that survive.
The tangent to at
is
. Which point does
give, and what is the tangent there?
Putting gives the point
on the parabola.
The tangent there is , a line of gradient
, which agrees with the general gradient
at
.
A hyperbola can be parametrised with and
, or with
and
. What does that mean for the equation of its tangent?
There are two equally correct forms of the same tangent: and
.
They describe the same line at the same point, so which one to use is decided by the parametrisation the point was given in.
Fill in the missing sign and the missing term in the condition for to be a tangent to the hyperbola
:
The completed condition is:
The subtraction comes straight from the minus sign in the hyperbola's own equation.
It has a consequence the other conics do not share: a real needs
to be at least
, so a line whose gradient is shallower than the asymptotes can never be a tangent.
Implicit differentiation of gives
. What is the tangent gradient at
?
Substituting the coordinates and rearranging gives .
It is positive for , and that sign traces back to the minus sign in the hyperbola's own equation.
True or False?
A straight line through the centre of a hyperbola can be a tangent to it.
False.
Such a line has , and the tangent condition then forces
, so
.
Those are the gradients of the asymptotes, which approach the curve without ever touching it, so no line through the centre is a tangent.
In simplifying a hyperbola's normal, what does become?
It becomes , since
is
multiplied by
.
That is the step that turns the normal into the tidy form .
At the normal to a hyperbola is
. Where does the
come from?
From the two constant terms that appear once the point is substituted in and the fraction is cleared: on one side and
on the other.
Moving the second across the equals sign turns its subtraction into an addition, which is where the sum of the two squares comes from.
Which extra route to the tangent gradient does allow?
Its equation can be rearranged to make the subject,
, and then differentiated directly with the power rule.
That route works here because the equation collapses to a single simple power of , which the other conics' equations do not.
Fill in the gradient of the tangent to the rectangular hyperbola at the point
:
The completed line is:
Whatever the value of , the number
is positive, so every tangent to a rectangular hyperbola has a negative gradient and slopes downwards.
The tangent to at
is
. Where does the
come from?
From substituting the point into and clearing the fraction, which leaves a term
on each side of the equals sign.
Bringing them together gives , and that doubling is why the right-hand side is not simply the
-coordinate of
.
True or False?
Every tangent to the rectangular hyperbola crosses both coordinate axes.
True.
Setting in
gives
, and setting
gives
.
Neither can ever be zero, because and
is never allowed to be zero, so every tangent cuts both axes away from the origin.
The normal to at
works out as
. Why are the powers of
so much higher than in the tangent?
Because the normal's gradient is , the negative reciprocal of the tangent's, which is already two powers up on the tangent's own gradient.
Clearing the remaining fraction then multiplies everything through by a further
, and those two steps together push the equation up to
and
.
By signing up you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy