Essays (AQA A Level Business): Revision Note

Exam code: 7132

Lisa Eades

Written by: Lisa Eades

Reviewed by: Steve Vorster

Updated on

How to answer the 25-mark essay question

Overview

  • 25-mark essays appear in Paper 1 only, in Sections C and D

  • There is no case study

    • Every argument should be tied to:

      • a named real business

        • e.g. Amazon, Dyson, Primark, a local café, a named start-up

      • a specific sector

        • e.g. retail, manufacturing, services, technology, construction

      • a realistic scenario that varies by business type or circumstances

        • e.g. a B2B supplier vs a cash-based retailer

  • These questions test all four assessment objectives

    • Knowledge

      • Worth 5 marks

      • Accurate use of business concepts, theory and definitions

    • Application

      • Worth 4 marks

      • Applying theory to named businesses, specific sectors or realistic scenarios

    • Analysis

      • Worth 6 marks

      • Developed chains of reasoning — cause → effect → consequence

    • Evaluation

      • Worth 10 marks (40% of the total)

      • Weighing up arguments and reaching a justified, supported judgement

Common command terms

  • "To what extent..."

  • "Evaluate..."

  • "Assess..."

  • "Justify your view"

How level of response marking works

  • These questions are marked using levels of response

  • The examiner reads the whole answer and decides which level it best fits overall

Level

Marks

What this looks like

 

Level 5

21–25

An excellent response overall that is fully focused on the key demands of the question

Provides an answer to the question set that:

  • demonstrates a depth and range of knowledge and understanding that is precise and well selected in relation to issues in the question

  • demonstrates analysis throughout which is well developed, is applied effectively to the context and considers a balanced range of the issues in the question

  • makes judgements or provides solutions which are built effectively on analysis, show balance and have a clear focus on the question as a whole throughout

Level 4

16–20

A good response overall that focuses on many of the demands of the question

Provides an answer to the question set that:

  • demonstrates a depth and range of knowledge and understanding of issues in the question

  • demonstrates analysis which is well developed, applied effectively to the context and considers a range of issues in the question

  • makes judgements or provides solutions which are built on analysis, show balance and address the question as a whole

Level 3

11–15

A reasonable response overall that focuses on some of the demands of the question

Provides an answer to the question set that:

  • demonstrates a limited knowledge and understanding of a range of issues in the question or a good knowledge and understanding of relatively few issues in the question

  • demonstrates analysis which is developed, applied to the context and considers some of the issues in the question

  • makes judgements or provides solutions which are built on analysis, but lack balance and are not fully focused on the question as a whole

Level 2

6–10

A limited response overall with little focus on the demands of the question

Provides an answer to the question set that:

  • demonstrates a limited range and depth of knowledge and understanding of issues in the question

  • demonstrates analysis with little development, mainly descriptive application to the context and considers a limited number of issues in the question

  • makes judgements or proposes solutions which have limited links to analysis or limited focus on the question as a whole

Level 1

1–5

A weak response overall lacking focus on the demands of the question

Provides an answer to the question set that:

  • demonstrates isolated or imprecise knowledge and understanding

  • demonstrates undeveloped analysis with descriptive application to the context and lacking focus on the question

  • makes judgements or proposes solutions based on assertions

  • The key difference between Level 3 and Level 5 is sustained, balanced evaluation

    • Top answers build judgements throughout the essay, not just in the conclusion, and show genuine engagement with arguments on both sides

Writing your essay

  • There is no single correct format, but the following structure consistently produces high-scoring responses

  • Allow approximately 25–28 minutes per essay.

Introduction (2-4 sentences)

  • Define the key concepts in the question precisely

  • Set out the scope - acknowledge that the answer may vary by business type, sector, or circumstance

  • Briefly signal the main areas you will explore

  • Give a clear indication of your view

Paragraph 1

  • Your strongest argument, supporting the statement

  • Develop a full, contextualised chain of analysis with a mini-evaluation

Paragraph 2

  • Your second supporting argument

  • Approach from a different angle or business type to show range

  • Again, develop a full, contextualised chain of analysis with a mini-evaluation

Paragraph 3

  • A fully developed counterargument

  • Show when and why the opposite applies

  • This paragraph needs a contrasting context, with a developed chain of reasoning

  • Also include a mini-evaluation to show balance

Paragraph 4

  • Further nuance

  • For example, consider business size, sector or external factors that change the answer

Conclusion (4–6 sentences)

  • Directly answer the question command

  • Weigh up: which argument is most significant, and under what conditions?

  • Prioritise: state which factor matters more and explain why

Developing chains of reasoning

  • A good way to build paragraphs in the main body of your essay is to use PEEAL

Letter

Stands for

What to do

 

P

Point

  • Make a clear claim in direct response to the question

E

Explain

  • Demonstrate your knowledge — theory, models, definitions

E

Example

  • Apply to a named business, specific sector, or realistic scenario

A

Analyse

  • Build a chain of reasoning: cause → effect → consequence

L+

Link/Evaluate

  • Add a mini-evaluation

    • e.g. "however, this depends on..." or "this is most significant when..."

Examiner Tips and Tricks

Avoid vague summaries that just list both sides without weighing them, and generic conclusions that could apply to any question on the topic

An example essay response

Is cash flow more important than profit for new businesses? Justify your view.

[25 marks]

Four colourful words on pastel backgrounds: "Knowledge" in yellow, "Application" in blue, "Analysis" in pink, "Evaluation" in green.
Text discussing cash flow vs. profit, highlighting challenges for new businesses due to high start-up costs and delayed payment cycles, with annotations.
Text discussing cash flow challenges in growing businesses, using Amazon as an example. Highlighted points underline real business context and analytical reasoning.
Text comparing short and long-term business strategies, with highlighted phrases indicating key points and arguments about cash flow and profitability.
Highlighted text discussing cash flow's importance for new businesses, with annotations pointing to a clear position and connection to earlier points.

Examiner Tips and Tricks

  • Plan before you write

    • Jot down 2 arguments in favour, 2 against, and decide your conclusion before you start

      • This ensures a balanced answer and stops you running out of ideas mid-essay.

  • Choose your question carefully

    • You have a choice of two in each section

    • Take 2 minutes to read both and pick the one where you can produce the most developed arguments

  • Build evaluation into each paragraph, not just the conclusion

    • Signpost phrases such as "however, this depends on...", "this is most significant when...", "for a small business..., whereas for a large multinational..." all demonstrate AO4

  • In the conclusion, take a clear side

    • Sitting on the fence rarely scores above Level 3 - examiners want a justified view, not a list of "on the one hand / on the other hand"

  • Aim for 550–650 words

    • This is enough for 3–4 developed paragraphs without rushing

Common mistakes

  • Describing instead of analysing

    • Explaining what something is without building a chain of cause and effect

  • One-sided answers

    • Covering only one side of the argument will not reach Level 4 or 5

  • Thin evaluation

    • A one-sentence conclusion does not meet the evaluation requirement

    • Evaluation must be built throughout each paragraph

  • Generic examples

    • E.g. "a business might..." is weak; "Amazon, for example,..." is better application

  • New ideas in the conclusion

    • The conclusion should weigh existing arguments, not introduce new ones

Unlock more, it's free!

Join the 100,000+ Students that ❤️ Save My Exams

the (exam) results speak for themselves:

Lisa Eades

Author: Lisa Eades

Expertise: Business Content Creator

Lisa has taught A Level, GCSE, BTEC and IBDP Business for over 20 years and is a senior Examiner for Edexcel. Lisa has been a successful Head of Department in Kent and has offered private Business tuition to students across the UK. Lisa loves to create imaginative and accessible resources which engage learners and build their passion for the subject.

Steve Vorster

Reviewer: Steve Vorster

Expertise: Economics & Business Subject Lead

Steve has taught A Level, GCSE, IGCSE Business and Economics - as well as IBDP Economics and Business Management. He is an IBDP Examiner and IGCSE textbook author. His students regularly achieve 90-100% in their final exams. Steve has been the Assistant Head of Sixth Form for a school in Devon, and Head of Economics at the world's largest International school in Singapore. He loves to create resources which speed up student learning and are easily accessible by all.