Solaris Energy Solutions (SES)
SES was founded in 2009 in country T by engineer and entrepreneur Marco Santos. Using $200,000 of personal savings and a $300,000 bank loan, Marco set up the business designing and installing solar panels for residential customers. The bank loan was fully repaid by 2013.
Timeline of SES's strategy for growth
2009–2014 | SES grew organically by reinvesting all profit Operations expanded from residential solar installation into small commercial projects All decisions made by Marco
|
|---|
2015 | |
|---|
2016 | |
|---|
2018 | SES acquires EcoGrid, a specialist energy storage company, for $8m Financed by a new bank loan and a further share issue (see Appendix 2)
|
|---|
2020 | |
|---|
2022 | |
|---|
Developing a new strategic direction
The domestic solar panel market in country T is becoming increasingly competitive. Several large multinational companies (MNCs) have entered the market in recent years, competing aggressively on price. Marco believes SES must change direction to secure its long-term future.
Two strategic options are being considered:
Option A: Expand internationally into country U, where government incentives have created rapid growth in solar energy demand.
Option B: Diversify within country T into electric vehicle (EV) charging infrastructure — a market that is growing rapidly as EV adoption increases.
SES's Finance Director has warned that the company's financial position has weakened and that any new strategy must be carefully costed and phased. Marco would like advice on which strategic direction SES should pursue.
Appendix 1: The renewable energy market in country T (2016)
The government of country T has committed to generating 50% of its electricity from renewable sources by 2030.
Solar energy is the fastest-growing renewable energy source in country T, with installations rising by 22% per year.
Growing public awareness of climate change is driving strong demand from residential and commercial customers.
Government subsidies for residential solar installations are generous but are scheduled to be reduced from 2021.
Competition for government contracts is intense; however, profit margins on public sector contracts are higher than on private sector work.
MNCs from Europe and Asia are beginning to establish operations in country T, benefiting from economies of scale and established brand recognition.
Appendix 2: HR Director's report following SES's acquisition of EcoGrid (2018)
EcoGrid was a family-run business of 45 employees. It had a flat organisational structure, a culture of autonomy and flexible working, and a strong reputation for technical innovation in energy storage systems.
SES operates with a more hierarchical management structure. Following the acquisition, SES standardised HR practices across both companies. EcoGrid employees were moved from flexible contracts to fixed-hours annualised contracts. A third of EcoGrid's specialist engineers chose to leave within twelve months.
Recruiting qualified energy storage engineers in country T is difficult. Training new engineers to the required standard takes an average of 18 months. Productivity in the EcoGrid division has fallen significantly since the acquisition. Several planned product development projects have been delayed.
Appendix 3: SES AI energy management software (2020)
Software is integrated into all new SES solar systems and is compatible with EcoGrid storage units.
Optimises energy use in real time, reducing customer energy bills by an estimated 15–20%.
Revenue model: customers pay an annual subscription fee of $120 per year.
12,000 customers are currently subscribed to the platform; subscription revenue is growing at 8% per year.
Development cost: $2.5m, funded entirely from SES's retained profit.
The platform is widely regarded within the industry as technically advanced, but requires ongoing investment to maintain and update.
Appendix 4: Analysis of SES's financial accounts between 2018 and 2022
| 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 |
|---|
Current ratio | 1.8 : 1 | 1.6 : 1 | 1.4 : 1 | 1.3 : 1 | 1.2 : 1 |
|---|
Acid test ratio | 1.2 : 1 | 1.0 : 1 | 0.8 : 1 | 0.7 : 1 | 0.6 : 1 |
|---|
Return on capital employed (%) | 18 | 15 | 13 | 11 | 9 |
|---|
Gearing (%) | 12 | 22 | 28 | 32 | 38 |
|---|
Profit for the year ($m) | 2.1 | 1.8 | 1.6 | 1.4 | 1.2 |
|---|