Social Learning Theory & Gender Development (AQA A Level Psychology): Revision Note
Syllabus Edition
First teaching 2025
First exams 2027
Exam code: 7182
The role of reinforcement in gender development
Social learning theory states that feminine and masculine behaviour is learned by observation and imitation of same-sex role models and through reinforcement for gender-appropriate behaviour
The pattern of boys and girls receiving different rewards or punishments for the same behaviour is known as differential reinforcement, and it operates through both:
direct learning (reinforcement of the child's own behaviour), and
indirect/vicarious learning (observing others being reinforced)
Enactive learning is where a child tries out a behaviour and directly experiences other people’s reactions (praise, teasing, punishment)
Direct learning happens when the child receives positive reinforcement for their gender-appropriate behaviour
E.g., ‘what a good boy you are to help Dad in the garden!’
Direct learning also takes place if the child is punished for gender-inappropriate behaviour they have engaged in
E.g., ‘as you keep playing with your mother’s lipstick, I won’t take you to the football match'
Positive outcomes strengthen and negative outcomes weaken the behaviour
The child gradually internalises the gender-appropriate behaviour and begins to self-regulate
Direct tuition is where children learn through explicit (direct) instructions about what is appropriate gender behaviour, and begins when children develop linguistic skills
E.g., 'girls don’t swear', 'big boys don’t cry'
Indirect learning takes place when the boy or girl observes another person gaining praise for gender-appropriate behaviour or punishment for gender-inappropriate behaviour
The behaviour is learnt through vicarious reinforcement, as behaviour for which another is praised or punished is likely to be learned by the child observing
The consequence received by the model determines whether the behaviour is likely to be performed by the observer
It is through different forms of reinforcement from those close to them (especially role models) that a child learns their gender identity directly and indirectly
The role of identification & modelling in gender development
Identification in the social learning theory of gender development is when a child internalises and adopts behaviours or attitudes shown by a role model of the same gender
E.g., a girl sees another girl acting in a gender-appropriate way (maybe playing with a doll)
The first child then internalises the message that this is what girls do, and she wants to do it as well
Modelling is a term used by Bandura (1977) to describe observational learning
It has four components (mediational processes):
Attention – the behaviour has to be observed
Retention – the behaviour needs to be remembered
Reproduction – the child needs to be physically and/or cognitively capable of imitating the behaviour
Motivation – the behaviour needs to be something the child wants to do
If all of the components outlined above are present, then the behaviour or attitude is likely to be imitated, and this is how behaviour, including gendered behaviour, is learned
If the role model is someone the child admires, and especially if they are the same sex as the child, then the behaviour becomes very likely to be imitated
Research which investigates social learning theory and gender development
Smith and Lloyd (1978) dressed babies as either 'boys' or 'girls' regardless of actual sex. Adults gave 'boys' masculine toys and encouraged active play; 'girls' received dolls and gentler interaction
This suggest that adults differentially reinforce gendered behaviour from infancy, influencing gender development before children can actively observe or imitate
Fagot & Leinbach (1995) found that four-year-olds displayed more gender role stereotyping and used gender labels earlier in ‘traditional’ families (where the father worked outside the home and the mother stayed home) than in less traditional families
This suggests that parents act as gender role models for their children
Quiery (1998) used questionnaires and naturalistic observation and found that fathers interacted more with sons, while mothers attended equally to sons and daughters
This suggests that fathers, more than mothers, reinforce gender roles
Evaluation of social learning theory and gender development
Strengths
Bussey and Bandura (1992) found that children aged 5–6 were more likely than 3–4-year-olds to feel "good" about gender-consistent behaviour and "bad" about gender-inconsistent behaviour
This supports SLT's claim that children move from external reinforcement to internal self-regulation as they internalise gender norms
SLT can explain gradually changing gender roles in society, as fathers and mothers increasingly swap or merge roles, providing children with a wider range of gender-appropriate behaviours to model
This shows that SLT has explanatory flexibility for cultural and historical change in a way that biological explanations cannot, since gender roles can shift within a generation if the role models available to children change
Limitations
SLT cannot fully explain individual differences within the same family, e.g., siblings of the same sex raised in the same household can develop very different gender identities, while children from non-traditional households may still develop traditional gender identities
This challenges SLT's central claim that role models and reinforcement reliably shape gender; other factors such as cognition, biology or peer influence play a significant role
SLT cannot explain why gender-typical behaviour follows a predictable developmental sequence, e.g., children's gender stereotypes typically peak around age 5–7 before becoming more flexible, regardless of the role models they are exposed to
This suggests that gender development is shaped by cognitive maturation as well as social learning, weakening SLT's claim that imitation and reinforcement are the primary drivers and supporting cognitive theories such as gender schema theory
Issues & Debates
The theory supports soft determinism – behaviour is influenced by environmental factors like observation and reinforcement, but individuals still have some agency in choosing who to imitate
This contrasts with biological determinism, offering a more flexible view of gender development
SLT emphasises environmental influences (e.g., role models, reinforcement) over biological factors, aligning with the nurture side of the nature–nurture debate
Gender roles are seen as learned behaviours rather than determined by genes or hormones
Examiner Tips and Tricks
When answering a question about social learning theory and gender development, remember to keep the focus on behaviour relevant to gender and not just answer about social learning theory generally.
Unlock more, it's free!
Was this revision note helpful?