The Role of Social Support in Coping with Stress (AQA A Level Psychology): Revision Note
Syllabus Edition
First teaching 2025
First exams 2027
Exam code: 7182
Instrumental, emotional & esteem support
Schaefer et al. (1981) identified at least three distinct forms of social support, which may help individuals cope with stress by acting as a defence against stressors
The three forms of social support are as follows:
Instrumental support – practical and tangible support, such as giving someone a lift to hospital, lending money, or providing information (telling someone what you know about stress)
Emotional support – expressions of warmth, concern, affection, empathy and love, summed up in what we mean when we say things like 'I really feel for you', which is not intended to offer any kind of practical help but rather to make the stressed person feel better
Esteem support – This occurs when friends and family show that they have high esteem for the individual, which strengthens their feelings of self-worth and helps them feel able to cope with the stress
Social networks vary in size and in the strength of the support they offer
Someone with a relatively small support network can get a great deal of support from few people, while someone with a large and widespread network may not get much support from it
Social support does not always have to be in person, as emotional and esteem support can be provided every minute of every day over social networks such as Facebook and X, and a cheque sent with a card or letter through the post offers instrumental support without anyone meeting face-to-face
Research which investigates the role of social support in coping with stress
Orth-Gomer et al. (1993) found that in a sample of 700 middle-aged Swedish men, smoking and lack of social support were the two leading risk factors for coronary heart disease
Fawzy et al. (1993) randomly allocated patients with malignant melanoma to a support group for six weeks, one session a week, which gave them an opportunity to express their feelings (emotional support) and to get information and advice about their illness (instrumental support)
Six years later, the support group patients had better NK cell functioning and were more likely to be alive and free of cancer than patients in a control group
Cohen et al. (2015) telephoned 404 healthy adult participants every evening for 14 consecutive days to measure the number of hugs they received each day, and had them complete a questionnaire assessing perceived social support and stress in terms of daily interpersonal conflicts
Participants were then exposed to a common cold virus and monitored for signs of illness
Participants who experienced the most interpersonal conflict were most likely to become ill, but those who perceived they had greater social support had a significantly reduced risk of illness, with hugs accounting for around a third of the protective effect
This suggests that perceived social support acts as a buffer against stress, and that hugs are a behavioural sign of actual emotional support
Evaluation of the role of social support in coping with stress
Strengths
Social support can be flexible, with different types of social support being more helpful in different situations, such as emotional support being more helpful when an individual is faced with the stress caused by the breakdown of a relationship
Luckow et al. (1998) reviewed 26 studies investigating gender differences in social support and found that women used social support as a means of coping with stress more than men did, with 25 of the studies showing no difference in men's use of it
This suggests the size of network is not the crucial factor influencing the effectiveness of social support, as in times of stress virtually every measure one came across found women are more likely to seek out and use social support as well as provide it
Limitations
Social support is not universally beneficial and can backfire, as what matters is who provides the support and what type they give
Emotional support is usually welcomed from friends and relatives, but instrumental support in the form of information is more valued when it comes from medical professionals
Also, there are times when emotional support from a close relative or friend is not helpful, e.g., if they insist on coming with us to a hospital appointment we might end up feeling more anxious than if we went alone
This suggests support may be more beneficial when it is sought by the recipient than when it is imposed by the supporter
It is difficult to isolate and test separate types of social support, making it difficult to assess which are most influential in helping individuals cope with stress
Issues & Debates
Taylor et al. (2004) compared Americans of European and Asian origins, and found that Asian-Americans were much less likely to seek and use social support networks in times of stress, as they were concerned not to disrupt the harmony of their communities by bringing their own problems to everybody's attention
This challenges the assumption that social support is universally beneficial, as its effectiveness appears to be influenced by cultural factors
Research typically uses large-scale, quantitative (nomothetic) methods to study social support
A fuller understanding of stress management could be achieved by combining this with idiographic approaches that explore individual differences in how support is experienced
Examiner Tips and Tricks
Remember to differentiate between the different types of social support, unless the question specifies which one you must write about. Make it clear throughout which one you are referring to.
Unlock more, it's free!
Was this revision note helpful?
Build on this topic