Exploring in Physics (DP IB Physics): Revision Note
Exploring in Physics
This is the creative start of the process where you act like a true scientist
It involves using your curiosity and existing physics knowledge to formulate a focused research question and a testable hypothesis
It requires independent thinking and consulting a variety of sources to understand the scientific context behind your idea and to make a clear, scientifically justified prediction
Developing your investigation
Demonstrate independent thinking, initiative, and insight
The best investigations often start with a simple question about a standard experiment
For example, "measuring the acceleration due to gravity, g."
You can show insight by framing it as a comparative investigation:
"To what extent does the mass of a pendulum bob affect its period of oscillation?"
This shows you are thinking about the assumptions within physical models
A common mistake is trying to investigate too many variables at once
A strong investigation explores the relationship between one independent variable and one dependent variable in depth
Avoid questions like "How do the length and mass of a pendulum affect its period?"
It is recommended that you choose just one factor and investigate it thoroughly
Consult a variety of sources
Before you can formulate a high-quality question, you need background information
This is a crucial research step
Good research helps you to:
understand the underlying physical principle
find established scientific values for comparison
identify a suitable method for collecting data
You can use various resources, including:
your notes
your textbook
the IB data booklet (opens in a new tab)
reliable online physics simulators, e.g. PhET Interactive Simulations (opens in a new tab).
This research provides the scientific context for your investigation, showing that you understand the physics behind your question
Formulate research questions and hypotheses
A research question (RQ) must:
be focused
be specific
clearly state the link between the independent variable and the dependent variable
An RQ like "How does gravity affect objects?" is too general
A focused RQ usually has the form "What is the relationship between
and
?"
For example, "What is the relationship between the length of a simple pendulum and its period of oscillation?"
A hypothesis is not a guess
It is a clear, testable statement that predicts the outcome and includes a scientific justification
The best hypotheses follow an "If..., then..., because..." structure
State and explain predictions using scientific understanding
The "because" part of your hypothesis is where you explain your prediction
This explanation must be based on established physical principles, such as Newton's laws, conservation of energy, or relevant formulae
A hypothesis like "If the length increases, the period will increase" is just a prediction
To make it a valid scientific hypothesis, you must add the justification:
"...because the theoretical equation for the period of a simple pendulum,
, shows that the period is directly proportional to the square root of the length."
Worked Example
Exploring an oscillation investigation
Broad idea:
I am interested in the factors that affect the time it takes for a pendulum to swing
Consulting sources and gaining insight:
My textbook shows that the formula for the period of a simple pendulum is
This equation suggests that the period depends on the length
and the acceleration of free fall
Crucially, the mass
of the pendulum bob does not appear in this equation, suggesting the period should be independent of the mass
Formulating the research question:
"What is the effect of the length of a simple pendulum on its period of oscillation?"
Formulating the hypothesis:
If the length of the pendulum is increased...
then the period of oscillation will also increase...
because the formula
shows that the period
is directly proportional to the square root of the length
Worked Example
Exploring an electrical resistance investigation
Broad idea:
I want to investigate the factors that affect the electrical resistance of a wire
Consulting sources and gaining insight:
My textbook defines resistivity
using the formula
where
is resistance,
is length, and
is the cross-sectional area
The formula shows a direct relationship between resistance and length. It also shows an inverse relationship between resistance and cross-sectional area.
Resistivity
is a property of the material itself. I can find accepted values for the resistivity of different metals, like copper and constantan, from a reliable source, such as the CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics (opens in a new tab)
Formulating the research question:
"What is the relationship between the length of a constantan wire of constant cross-sectional area and its electrical resistance?"
Formulating the hypothesis:
If the length of the constantan wire is increased...
then its resistance will increase proportionally...
because the formula
states that resistance is directly proportional to length, assuming a constant cross-sectional area and temperature
Worked Example
Exploring specific heat capacity
Broad idea:
I want to understand why different materials heat up at different rates
Consulting sources and gaining insight:
The syllabus defines specific heat capacity
as the energy required to raise the temperature of a unit mass by one degree, using the equation
Trustworthy databases, such as NIST (opens in a new tab), provide accepted values for the specific heat capacity of different materials
For example, the value for copper is much lower than for aluminium
This implies that less energy is needed to raise the temperature of copper compared to an equal mass of aluminium
Formulating the research question:
"How can the method of mixtures be used to experimentally determine the specific heat capacity of an unknown metal block?"
Formulating the hypothesis:
If a heated metal block is placed in a known mass of cool water...
then the specific heat capacity of the metal can be calculated...
because according to the principle of conservation of energy, the thermal energy lost by the metal block will be equal to the thermal energy gained by the water, allowing
for the metal to be determined from the equation:
Examiner Tips and Tricks
Struggling for an idea is normal.
Good starting points include:
A surprising or unexplained result from a class experiment.
Investigating a different aspect of a standard lab, such as the effect of temperature on a spring's stiffness.
Applying a physical concept to a real-world product, like investigating the bounce efficiency of different types of sports balls.
Check feasibility first.
Always consider if you have the right equipment, sensors, and time to actually carry out your investigation.
A great idea is not useful if it's not practical in a school lab.
Be prepared to refine your idea.
Your initial research might show that your first idea is not possible or practical.
Don't be afraid to change your RQ based on what you learn.
You may need to conduct additional research to help you refine the scope of your investigation.
This is part of the scientific process.
Unlock more, it's free!
Did this page help you?