Exam code: 9MA0
1/70Still learning
Know0
What does it mean to differentiate an equation implicitly?
Differentiating both sides with respect to without first rearranging the equation into the form
.
It is used whenever writing explicitly in terms of
would be awkward or impossible, as for
.

Join for free to unlock a full flashcard set, track what you know,
and turn revision into real progress.
Complete the rule for differentiating a function of with respect to
:
The completed rule is:
This is the chain rule: is itself a function of
, so differentiating anything built from
brings out a factor of
.
What is ?
.
Differentiate the power exactly as usual, then multiply by because the variable being differentiated is
rather than
.
Was this flashcard helpful?
What does it mean to differentiate an equation implicitly?
Differentiating both sides with respect to without first rearranging the equation into the form
.
It is used whenever writing explicitly in terms of
would be awkward or impossible, as for
.
Complete the rule for differentiating a function of with respect to
:
The completed rule is:
This is the chain rule: is itself a function of
, so differentiating anything built from
brings out a factor of
.
What is ?
.
Differentiate the power exactly as usual, then multiply by because the variable being differentiated is
rather than
.
What is ?
.
A term containing both variables is a product, so it needs the product rule as well: differentiating gives
, and differentiating
gives
.
Why must you never split when rearranging?
Because it is a single algebraic object, not a fraction with on top and
underneath.
Collect it and factorise it out in exactly the way you would treat any single unknown letter.
Will implicit differentiation always give as a function of
alone?
No. The answer is usually in terms of both and
, and that is perfectly acceptable.
To get a numerical gradient you substitute both coordinates of the point, rather than just the -value.
True or False?
Implicit differentiation is just the chain rule applied to terms containing .
True.
Every step comes from treating as a function of
and applying the chain rule, with the product rule joining in for terms that contain both variables.
There is no new rule to learn here, only a new situation in which to use the old ones.
By signing up you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy