Exam code: 9MA0
1/250Still learning
Know0
Why does the expansion of have infinitely many terms when
is negative or fractional?
Each new term brings in the next factor of ,
,
, and so on.
If is a positive integer these eventually reach
, and every term after that is zero, so the expansion stops.
A negative or fractional never hits zero, so the terms never run out.

Join for free to unlock a full flashcard set, track what you know,
and turn revision into real progress.
Define the validity statement of a binomial expansion.
The range of values of for which an infinite binomial expansion converges, and so genuinely equals the expression it came from.
For it is
, which is another way of writing
.
Exam questions usually call this the range of validity.
Fill in the missing numerator:
The completed expansion is:
Each term brings in one more factor, going down by 1 each time, and the denominator is the factorial of the power of .
Was this flashcard helpful?
Why does the expansion of have infinitely many terms when
is negative or fractional?
Each new term brings in the next factor of ,
,
, and so on.
If is a positive integer these eventually reach
, and every term after that is zero, so the expansion stops.
A negative or fractional never hits zero, so the terms never run out.
Define the validity statement of a binomial expansion.
The range of values of for which an infinite binomial expansion converges, and so genuinely equals the expression it came from.
For it is
, which is another way of writing
.
Exam questions usually call this the range of validity.
Fill in the missing numerator:
The completed expansion is:
Each term brings in one more factor, going down by 1 each time, and the denominator is the factorial of the power of .
True or False?
The expansion of is only valid for
, whatever the value of
.
False.
When is a positive integer the expansion is a finite sum, and it is valid for every value of
.
The restriction is only needed when the expansion is an infinite series, because an infinite series has to converge.
For practical purposes, why do you only need the first few terms of a general binomial expansion?
Because , so raising
to a high power gives a number very close to zero:
as
.
The later terms are too small to make a noticeable difference, so a few terms give a good approximation, and it is rare to need to go beyond the term in .
The expansion only equals the original expression when every term is included.
In a general binomial expansion, what is the most common slip when working out and
for a fractional or negative
?
Forgetting that the numbers become negative.
If then
and
.
If then
.
How do you use the expansion of to expand
?
Replace every in the expansion with
.
Keep in brackets, so that, for example,
, and check whether
is negative: in
,
.
What happens to the validity statement when you expand ?
Replace with
there too, giving
.
For this is
, so
.
The general binomial expansion is written for .
What is the first thing you must do to expand when
?
Factorise out of the bracket, so the term inside becomes 1:
The stays outside as a multiplier, and you expand the bracket.
Fill in the missing index:
The completed expression is:
A root becomes a fractional power, and moving the bracket out of the denominator makes that power negative.
Why must be rewritten in the form
before the general binomial expansion can be used?
The expansion in the formula booklet is only given for , with a 1 as the first term in the bracket.
Once the bracket is in that form you can read the expansion straight off the booklet and replace with
.
What is the range of validity of the expansion of ?
, which rearranges to
.
It comes from the bracket after factorising, not from the original expression. For it gives
.
True or False?
The expansions of and
are valid for the same values of
.
False.
The range of validity depends on , so changing
changes it.
is valid for
, while
is valid for
.
How do you expand an expression containing more than one binomial, such as ?
Break it into separate binomials, here and
.
Expand each one individually, then multiply the expansions together and collect like terms.
True or False?
To multiply two binomial expansions together up to the term in , you must multiply out every pair of terms.
False.
Any product whose powers add to more than 2 can be ignored, since it only affects terms you are not keeping.
So you only need the pairs that give ,
and
, which saves a great deal of work.
When expanding an expression that contains more than one binomial, how far must each one be expanded if the final answer is needed up to the term in ?
As far as the term in in each expansion.
A term in in the final answer can come from
as well as from
, so stopping any earlier would lose part of it.
Expanding uses
, valid for
, and
, valid for
.
The whole expansion is valid for
The whole expansion is valid for .
Both expansions have to be valid at the same time, so the overall range of validity is the intersection of the two: the smaller boundary wins.
What lets you apply the general binomial expansion to a rational function such as ?
Splitting it into partial fractions first:
Each partial fraction can then be written as a negative power, , and expanded.
How do you prepare for a binomial expansion, when the constant term is
?
Factorise the out of the bracket so the constant term becomes
:
The leaves the bracket raised to the power
, here
.
How do you use a binomial expansion to approximate a numerical value?
Compare the number you want with the expression that was expanded, solve for , then substitute that
into the expansion.
To approximate from
, solve
to get
, and put that into the expansion.
What makes a binomial approximation more accurate?
Using more terms of the expansion. Each extra term brings the value closer to the true one.
Terms up to or
are usually accurate enough.
Before using a value of in a binomial approximation, what must you check about it?
That it lies inside the range of validity of the expansion.
is only valid for
, so
, which needs
, cannot be approximated from it.
Exam questions often hide a validity check inside an approximation question.
True or False?
If the value of you need lies outside the range of validity of a binomial expansion, using more terms will still give a good approximation.
False.
Outside the range of validity the series does not converge, so extra terms do not settle towards the true value, they make things worse.
The expansion cannot be used for that value at all.
Fill in the missing values so a binomial expansion can be used to approximate :
The completed working is:
Taking out a perfect square leaves a much smaller number, which an expansion can reach.
Two expansions can both approximate the same value, one needing and the other
.
Which gives the better approximation?
The one using .
The terms left out are powers of , and those shrink far faster when
is small. A value of
near the edge of the range of validity gives a poor approximation even though the expansion is still valid.
By signing up you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy