How to Answer a 20 Mark Evaluate Question (AQA A Level Sociology): Revision Note
Exam code: 7192
Written by: Raj Bonsor
Updated on
How do I answer an AQA A Level Sociology 20-mark Evaluate question?
20-mark 'Evaluate' questions appear in Paper 2 as the third question on each of your two topics, and they assess your ability to:
demonstrate knowledge and understanding of sociological theories, concepts and evidence (AO1)
apply material from the Item and your own knowledge to the question (AO2)
analyse and evaluate sociological material in order to present arguments, make judgements and draw conclusions (AO3)
The final question on Paper 3 (Theory and Methods) is also a 20-mark 'Evaluate' question and is marked in the same way
The 20-mark Methods in Context question on Paper 1 is marked differently
A 20-mark 'Evaluate' question is always presented with an Item and always starts with the same words:
E.g. Applying material from Item D and your knowledge, evaluate feminist explanations of the role of the family in society today [20 marks]
The 30-mark questions on Papers 1 and 3 start with the same words, so check the marks before you plan
The marks available in this question are as follows:
AO1 = 8 marks
AO2 = 6 marks
AO3 = 6 marks
Answers are placed in one of five bands, and the top band (17–20 marks) requires:
sound, conceptually detailed knowledge of a range of relevant material, which examiners describe as more than three key ideas
appropriate material applied accurately and with sensitivity to the issues raised by the question
analysis and evaluation that are explicit and relevant, with appropriate conclusions drawn
The question can ask you to evaluate a perspective, an explanation or a view, for example:
evaluate functionalist explanations of the role of the family
evaluate the view that religion is a conservative force
evaluate the view that the UK has become a more child-centred society
How do I use the Item?
The purpose of the Item is to suggest a few starting points, including ways into evaluation
E.g. Item D in the worked example below ends by pointing to sociologists who reject the feminist view
Refer to the Item explicitly, using wording such as 'As Item D states...'
Examiners report that the best answers use the prompts from the Item well and develop them
You are expected to bring in further ideas of your own and not rely only on the Item
This is what 'and your knowledge' means in the question
Unlike the 10-mark 'Analyse' question, your points do not all have to come from the Item, and its final sentence can be a way into evaluation
How should I structure my essay?
Make a brief plan before you start writing, which should include:
your main argument or line of reasoning
two or three key perspectives or theories
relevant studies or examples
your evaluation points
Write a brief introduction that sets out the argument of your essay
An introduction will not attract marks if it only repeats the question or parts of the Item
Write three to five substantial paragraphs
It is more effective to cover a limited number of views or theories in depth than to try to include everything
Each paragraph should:
start with a clear point
develop it using relevant sociological theories, concepts and evidence
include evaluation, such as strengths, limitations or comparisons
link back to the question
Finish with a conclusion that is evaluative and not a summary
It should reach a judgement that is consistent with the line of argument in your essay
It should not introduce new points
How do I evaluate effectively?
Examiners describe five levels of evaluation, from the weakest to the strongest:
juxtaposition
stated
limited explicit
explicit, developed and relevant
evaluating the evaluation, or judging the relative importance of different points
Juxtaposition means placing one view next to another without showing how they relate
E.g. 'Marxists argue the education system serves the interests of the ruling class, but functionalists believe it is for the benefit of society as a whole'
To make your evaluation explicit, explain why the second view challenges the first and what this means for the question
Examiners say that good evaluation involves a strength and a limitation, with some weighing up of the issue before coming to a reasoned judgement
A reasoned judgement receives more credit than a learned criticism that is stated without explanation
The best evaluation is built into each paragraph and not added on at the end of the essay
If the question names one view, use other perspectives to evaluate that view
Do not describe each of the other perspectives at length
How much should I write in a 20-mark Evaluate essay?
You will have around 30 minutes to answer a 20-mark 'Evaluate' question, which includes reading the Item and planning
Aim to write around 600–700 words
You should practise writing in timed conditions before you sit your exams
Remember that there are 8 marks available for AO1
Your knowledge needs to be conceptually detailed, but it must be selected to fit the question
Think quality over quantity
Four well-developed points will always score more than a list of everything you know about the topic
Worked Example
Here is an example of a 20-mark 'Evaluate' question with an Item, followed by three extracts from a model answer:
Item D
Feminist sociologists emphasise the harmful effects of the conventional nuclear family on women. They see it as playing a role in the continuing oppression of women. This is evident in areas such as domestic violence, paid employment and power.
Other sociologists reject this negative view of the family and argue that it is essential for society.
Q. Applying material from Item D and your knowledge, evaluate feminist explanations of the role of the family in society today.
[20 marks]
Extract 1: the introduction
Item D states that feminist sociologists 'emphasise the harmful effects of the conventional nuclear family on women' and see it as playing a role in 'continuing oppression'. Feminist sociologists see the family as a key place where women are oppressed, although different types of feminism focus on different reasons for this. This essay will look at liberal, Marxist and radical feminist explanations and compare them to functionalist and personal life views.
Extract 2: a main body paragraph
Radical feminists take Item D's reference to 'domestic violence' and 'power' as their main focus. Delphy and Leonard argued that the family is the main place where women are exploited, with men benefiting directly from women's unpaid work and emotional labour. Dobash and Dobash studied domestic violence and found that the home is the most dangerous place for many women, with violence used by partners to maintain power and control. For example, the Crime Survey for England and Wales estimates that almost 3 in 10 women have experienced domestic abuse since the age of 16, and partners or ex-partners are the most common suspects when women are killed. This strongly supports the feminist claim that the conventional family harms women. Greer (2000) goes further and argues that women would be better off in matrifocal or all-female 'sisterhoods' than in heterosexual families. However, radical feminism is criticised for making out that all men are oppressive and ignoring the loving and supportive relationships many women have within their families.
Extract 3: the conclusion
In conclusion, feminist explanations capture real and ongoing inequality in the family. Women's unpaid labour, the wage gap, gendered power and domestic violence all show that the conventional family continues to harm many women. However, no single feminist strand fully explains modern family life on its own. Liberal feminism best shows gradual progress, Marxist feminism best shows the link to capitalism, and radical feminism best shows the most violent face of patriarchy. Overall, a combined feminist view is more convincing than functionalist or personal life rejections, but it has to recognise both improvement over time and the positive meanings many women still find in family life.
Top band response: 17–20 marks
Marking commentary:
The full response is in the top band because it shows conceptually detailed knowledge of a range of material: three strands of feminism and two opposing views. The introduction is brief, uses Item D and sets out the views the essay will weigh up, so it does more than repeat the question. The main body paragraph starts from a prompt in Item D, develops it with named studies and evidence and ends with explicit evaluation of radical feminism. The conclusion is evaluative and not a summary: it weighs the feminist strands against each other, reaches a judgement that is consistent with the rest of the essay and introduces no new points.
Step by step structure of the full essay:
Paragraph 1: A brief introduction uses Item D and sets out the views that will be weighed up (AO2)
Paragraph 2: Liberal feminism is explained using equality laws and Sullivan's research, linked to 'paid employment and power' in Item D, then evaluated as too optimistic (AO1, AO2 and AO3)
Paragraph 3: Marxist feminism is explained using Benston and Ansley, linked to 'paid employment' in Item D, then evaluated as too focused on the economy (AO1, AO2 and AO3)
Paragraph 4: Radical feminism is explained using Delphy and Leonard and Dobash and Dobash, linked to 'domestic violence' and 'power' in Item D, then evaluated (AO1, AO2 and AO3)
Paragraph 5: The opposing views in Item D (functionalism and the personal life perspective) are used to evaluate the feminist view, and not described at length (AO2 and AO3)
Paragraph 6: An evaluative conclusion weighs the strands and reaches a judgement (AO3)
Examiner Tips and Tricks
Examiners have suggested the following advice to help you improve your performance on 20-mark 'Evaluate' questions:
Move away from juxtaposition to explicit evaluation, as many students simply offer other theories as alternatives
Make a brief essay plan, as students who did so appeared to benefit by having more structured and coherent responses
Unlock more, it's free!
Was this revision note helpful?