How to Answer a 6-Mark Data Question (AQA A Level Geography): Revision Note
Exam code: 7037
What is a 6-mark data question?
This is usually a levelled response question, so each point you make doesn't equal a mark
The 6-mark data question, one of two types of 6-marker, is the second question in each section of both Paper 1 and Paper 2
You will answer three on each paper
These questions carry 18 of the 120 marks (15%)
Questions with a calculation or plotting task can split the marks differently
For example, the June 2023 standard deviation questions gave 3 marks for the calculation and up to 3 marks for evaluation
It asks you to work with a figure, such as a graph, map or table
You have about 7–8 minutes, and it is a skills question, so all the evidence you need is in the figure
The question at a glance
Marks | 6 |
Where it appears | the second question in each section |
Suggested time | about 7–8 minutes |
Suggested length | about 130–170 words |
Assessment objective 3 | 6 marks |
Command phrases and assessment objectives
These questions often use command phrases such as:
"analyse"
"interpret"
Past paper questions include:
“Analyse the data shown in Figure 5a and Figure 5b.” (Paper 1, June 2024)
“Using Figure 3a and Figure 3b, interpret the change in rainfall and vegetation patterns in central and north Africa.” (Paper 1, June 2024)
“Interpret the maps shown in Figure 3a and Figure 3b.” (Paper 2, June 2024)
“Analyse the information shown in Figure 11.” (Paper 1, June 2024)
The question tests one assessment objective (AO):
AO3 (6 marks): what you can do with data, meaning using geographical skills to interpret and analyse data and evidence
Other forms of this question
Some questions in this position ask you to do more than analyse:
“Complete Figure 3a by plotting the data for Southville shown in Figure 3b and analyse the data shown in the completed Figure 3a.” (Paper 2, June 2023)
“Complete the table and standard deviation calculation in Figure 5 and evaluate the usefulness of the technique in analysing this data.” (Paper 1, June 2023)
“To what extent does Figure 9 show that wildfires are increasing in intensity and severity?” (Paper 1, June 2023)
These are still skills questions, so answer them using the figure
How much should I write?
Spend about 1 minute reading the figure and about 6–7 minutes writing
Aim for about 130–170 words
Use the figure's data to support your points rather than listing every value
You don't need to comment on everything in the figure to reach Level 2
How is a 6-mark data question marked?
This is a levelled response question, so each point you make doesn't equal a mark
The examiner reads your whole answer and decides which level it best fits
The examiner then places it within that level's mark range
The two levels
Level 2 (4–6 marks)
Clear analysis of the evidence in the figure
Appropriate use of data to support your points
Clear connections between different aspects of the data
Level 1 (1–3 marks)
Basic analysis of the evidence in the figure
Limited use of data
Basic connections between different aspects of the data
What separates Level 1 from Level 2?
Level 1 answers often copy values from the figure or describe one part at a time
Level 2 answers start with the overall pattern and then use data to support it
Level 2 answers also compare parts of the data, identify anomalies and use simple calculations
How to answer a 6-mark data question
Step 1
Read the question carefully and highlight the command phrase
"Analyse the data shown in Figure 1."
"Analyse" means that you need to break the data into its parts and show how they connect
Step 2
Read the figure carefully and highlight the key information:
the title and any dates
the units, scale and key
whether any of the data is a projection
In this example, the figure shows percentages, so differences between them are percentage points
Step 3
Spend about 1 minute looking for patterns
A 6-marker structure for this question could be:
overall pattern: most regions become more urban
comparison: the least urban regions change most
calculation: the gap between regions narrows
anomaly: Oceania falls between 1990 and 2018
Step 4
Write your answer, opening with the overall pattern
Support each point with data, using simple calculations where you can:
Copied: "Asia was 32% in 1990 and 50% in 2018"
Manipulated: "Asia rose by 18 percentage points between 1990 and 2018"
Compare different parts of the data, and link the figures if there is more than one
Identify any anomalies, but don't explain why they occur
You don't need to reach a final judgement unless the question asks for one
What if?
The figure looks complicated: take a minute to look carefully at the title, units and key, then look for one overall pattern
You can't see a calculation to do: work out a simple difference or percentage between two values, because basic calculations show that you're working with the data
You've started explaining why: stop and go back to what the figure shows, such as another comparison or an anomaly
Worked Example
Figure 1 shows the percentage of the population living in urban areas, by region, in 1990 and 2018, with a projection for 2050.
Figure 1
Region | 1990 (%) | 2018 (%) | 2050 (%)(projected) |
|---|---|---|---|
Northern America | 75 | 82 | 89 |
Latin America and the Caribbean | 71 | 81 | 88 |
Europe | 70 | 74 | 84 |
Oceania | 70 | 68 | 72 |
Asia | 32 | 50 | 66 |
Africa | 32 | 43 | 59 |
World | 43 | 55 | 68 |
Source: United Nations (2019) World Urbanization Prospects: The 2018 Revision
Analyse the data shown in Figure 1.
[6 marks]
Model answer:
Figure 1 shows that most regions became more urban between 1990 and 2018, and that all regions are projected to be more urban by 2050. [E] The world's urban share rose by 12 percentage points to 55% in 2018, and is projected to reach 68% by 2050. [E]
The least urban regions changed most. Asia's urban share rose by 18 percentage points between 1990 and 2018 and Africa rose by 11, while Northern America rose by only 7. [E] Asia and Africa both began at 32% in 1990, but Asia was 7 percentage points ahead by 2018. [E] The gap between the most and least urban regions is therefore projected to narrow from 43 percentage points in 1990 to 30 in 2050. [E]
Oceania is an anomaly, as it is the only region that became less urban, falling from 70% to 68% by 2018. [E] It was level with Europe in 1990, but it is projected to be 12 percentage points behind by 2050. [E] Overall, the range between the regions is narrowing, although Africa remains least urban in 2018 and 2050. [E]
[6 marks]
Mark allocation
This is a 'levelled response' question. Each valid point made in the answer does not equal a mark.
[E] shows the use of skills to analyse the evidence in the figure (AO3, 6 marks)
Commentary
This answer reaches Level 2 because it analyses the data rather than copying it:
Paragraph 1: gives the overall pattern and covers all three dates
Paragraph 2: compares regions, using differences between values and a calculated range
Paragraph 3: identifies an anomaly and summarises the pattern without explaining it
Common errors
Common errors that hold answers in Level 1 include:
explaining why a pattern occurs, which tests applying your knowledge (AO2) and is not assessed here
bringing in your own knowledge of named places
copying values without any comparison or calculation
describing each row or figure separately
misreading the scale, units or key
Alternative content
The answer above is just one example of a response to this question. Other information that could be used in the answer includes:
Latin America and the Caribbean moving further ahead of Europe between 1990 and 2018
Africa's 16 percentage point projected rise between 2018 and 2050, the same as Asia's
Northern America remaining the most urban region at every date
Examiner Tips and Tricks
Start with the big picture, then use data to back it up. Focus on patterns, contrasts and anomalies rather than small details, and use a simple calculation to show that you are working with the data.
Don't give reasons for what you see, because no marks are available for explaining patterns on these questions. Check the command phrase as well, because a question that asks you to evaluate a technique needs more than analysis of the data.
Unlock more, it's free!
Was this revision note helpful?