Limitations of Measurements (Edexcel AS Physics): Revision Note

Exam code: 8PH0

Katie M

Written by: Katie M

Reviewed by: Caroline Carroll

Updated on

Guided study available on this topic

Understand this topic with deeper explanations and understanding checks.

Limitation of Measurements

Types of Error

  • Measurements of quantities are made with the aim of finding the true value of that quantity

  • In reality, it is impossible to obtain the true value of any quantity as there will always be a degree of uncertainty

    • This can be seen when you repeat a measurement and you get different results

  • An error is the difference between the measurement result and the true value if a true value is thought to exist

    • This is not a mistake in the measurement

    • The error can be due to both systematic and random effects and an error of unknown size is a source of uncertainty 

  • Random and systematic errors are two types of measurement errors that lead to uncertainty

Random error

  • Random errors cause unpredictable fluctuations in an instrument’s readings as a result of uncontrollable factors, such as environmental conditions

  • This affects the precision of the measurements taken, causing a wider spread of results about the mean value

  • To reduce random error:

    • Repeat measurements several times and calculate an average from them

Systematic error

  • Systematic errors arise from the use of faulty instruments or from flaws in the experimental method

  • This type of error is repeated consistently every time the instrument or method are used, which affects the accuracy of all readings obtained

  • To reduce systematic errors:

    • Instruments should be recalibrated, or different instruments should be used

    • Corrections or adjustments should be made to the technique

Graph of quantity 1 against quantity 2. The line of expected values passes through the origin; the line through the measured values (crosses) is parallel to it but shifted up, so it is offset from the origin. A systematic error can offset the line on either the x-axis or the y-axis.

Systematic errors on graphs are shown by the offset of the line from the origin

Graph of number of measurements against measured value, showing four distributions. A narrow peak away from the true value is precise but not accurate; a wide peak away from it is inaccurate and imprecise; a narrow peak centred on the true value (dashed line) is accurate and precise; a wide peak centred on the true value is accurate but not precise.

Representing precision and accuracy on a graph

 

Zero error

  • This is a type of systematic error that occurs when an instrument gives a reading when, in fact, the true reading is zero

  • This introduces a fixed error into the readings, which must be accounted for when the results are recorded

  • Zero error is a type of systematic error since all the values will be displaced by the same amount

Precision and accuracy

Precision

  • Precise measurements denote the closeness of agreement (consistency) between values obtained by repeated measurement

    • This is influenced only by random effects and can be expressed numerically by measures such as standard deviation

    • A measurement is precise if the values ‘cluster’ closely together

  • Precise measurements have very little spread about the mean value, in other words, how close the measured values are to each other

  • If a measurement is repeated several times, it can be described as precise when the values are very similar to, or the same as, each other

  • Recording a value to more decimal places reflects the resolution of the instrument, not the precision – precision describes how closely repeated readings agree

Accuracy

  • A measurement is considered accurate if it is close to the true value

  • It is a quality denoting the closeness of agreement between measurement and true value

    • It cannot be quantified and is influenced by random and systematic errors

  • The accuracy can be increased by repeating measurements and finding a mean of the results

  • Repeating measurements also helps to identify anomalies that can be omitted from the final results 

Four targets with dots showing results. Accurate and precise: dots tightly grouped on the centre. Accurate but not precise: dots spread evenly around the centre. Precise but not accurate: dots tightly grouped away from the centre. Neither accurate nor precise: dots scattered widely.

The difference between precise and accurate results

Resolution

  • Resolution is the smallest change in the quantity being measured

    • It gives a perceptible change in the reading

    • It is also the source of uncertainty in a single reading

  • For example, the resolution of a wristwatch is 1 s, whereas the resolution of a digital stop-clock is typically 10 ms (0.01 s)

  • In imaging, resolution can also be described as the ability to see two structures as two separate structures rather than as one fuzzy entity

An ultrasound transducer sends waves towards two small objects close together. With good resolution, closely spaced wave pulses produce an image showing two separate objects; with poor resolution, widely spaced pulses produce an image in which the two objects merge into one blurred shape.

Good resolution and poor resolution in an ultrasound scanner. The good image manages to resolve the two objects into two distinct structures, whereas the poor image shows one fuzzy entity.

Uncertainties

  • Uncertainty is the interval within which the true value is expected to lie, with a given level of confidence or probability

    • Any measurement will have some uncertainty about the result, this will come from variations in the data obtained and be subject to systematic or random effects

  • Uncertainties are not the same as errors

    • Errors can be thought of as issues with equipment or methodology that cause a reading to be different from the true value

    • The uncertainty is a range of values around a measurement within which the true value is expected to lie, and is an estimate

  • For example, if the true value of the mass of a box is 950 g, but a systematic error with a balance gives an actual reading of 952 g, the error is 2 g

  • These uncertainties can be represented in a number of ways:

    • Absolute uncertainty: where uncertainty is given as a fixed quantity

    • Fractional uncertainty: where uncertainty is given as a fraction of the measurement

    • Percentage uncertainty: where uncertainty is given as a percentage of the measurement

  • Percentage uncertainty is defined by the equation:

Percentage uncertainty = uncertaintymeasured value×100

  • To find uncertainties in different situations:

    • The uncertainty in a reading: half the smallest division i.e. ± ½ × (resolution)

    • The uncertainty in a measurement: at least ±1 smallest division

    • The uncertainty in repeated data: half the range i.e. ± ½ × (largest − smallest value)

    • The uncertainty in digital readings: ± the last significant digit unless otherwise quoted

An ammeter scale from 0 to 15 mA with a smallest division of 0.2 mA, reading 1.6 mA. Absolute uncertainty = ½ × 0.2 mA = 0.1 mA, so I = 1.6 ± 0.1 mA. Fractional uncertainty = 0.1/1.6 = 1/16. Percentage uncertainty = 0.1/1.6 × 100 = 6.2%, so I = 1.6 mA ± 6.2%.

How to calculate absolute, fractional and percentage uncertainty

 

  • Always make sure your absolute or percentage uncertainty is to the same number of significant figures as the reading

Combining Uncertainties

  • When combining uncertainties, the rules are as follows:

Adding / Subtracting Data

  • Add together the absolute uncertainties

Adding or subtracting data: a tyre has outer diameter d₁ = 55.0 ± 0.5 cm and inner diameter d₂ = 21.0 ± 0.7 cm. The difference is d₁ − d₂ = 34.0 cm, and its uncertainty is the sum of the absolute uncertainties, ±(0.5 + 0.7) = ±1.2 cm, so d₁ − d₂ = 34.0 ± 1.2 cm.

Multiplying / Dividing Data

  • Add the percentage or fractional uncertainties

Multiplying or dividing data: a car travels a distance of 50.0 ± 0.1 m in a time of 5.00 ± 0.05 s, so its speed v = 50.0/5.00 = 10.0 m s⁻¹. The fractional uncertainties add: ∆v/v = 0.1/50.0 + 0.05/5.00 = 0.002 + 0.01 = 0.012, so the absolute uncertainty is 10.0 × 0.012 = 0.12 m s⁻¹ and v = 10.0 ± 0.12 m s⁻¹.

Raising to a Power

  • Multiply the percentage uncertainty by the power

Raising to a power: a sphere of radius r = 2.50 ± 0.02 cm is measured with vernier callipers. Its volume V = 4/3 πr³ = 65.5 cm³. The fractional uncertainty is ∆V/V = 3 × ∆r/r = 3 × 0.02/2.50 = 0.024, so the absolute uncertainty is 65.5 × 0.024 = 1.57 cm³ and the percentage uncertainty is 2.4%.

Worked Example

A student achieves the following results in their experiment for the angular frequency, ω of a rotating ball bearing.

0.154, 0.153, 0.159, 0.147, 0.152

Calculate the percentage uncertainty in the mean value of ω.

Answer:

Step 1: Calculate the mean value 

mean ω = 0.154+0.153+0.159+0.147+0.1525= 0.153 rad s–1

Step 2: Calculate half the range (this is the uncertainty for multiple readings)

12× (0.159 – 0.147) = 0.006 rad s–1

Step 3: Calculate percentage uncertainty

uncertaintymeasured value×100=±half the rangemean×100

0.0060.153×100 = 3.9 %

Examiner Tips and Tricks

It is a very common mistake to confuse precision with accuracy - measurements can be precise but not accurate if each measurement reading has the same error. Make sure you learn that precision refers to the ability to take multiple readings with an instrument that are close to each other, whereas accuracy is the closeness of those measurements to the true value.

Remember:

  • Absolute uncertainties have the same units as the quantity

  • Percentage uncertainties have no units

  • The uncertainty in numbers and constants, such as π, is taken to be zero

Unlock more, it's free!

Join the 100,000+ Students that ❤️ Save My Exams

the (exam) results speak for themselves:

Build on this topic

Katie M

Author: Katie M

Expertise: Curriculum Expert

Katie has always been passionate about the sciences, and completed a degree in Astrophysics at Sheffield University. She decided that she wanted to inspire other young people, so moved to Bristol to complete a PGCE in Secondary Science. She particularly loves creating fun and absorbing materials to help students achieve their exam potential.

Caroline Carroll

Reviewer: Caroline Carroll

Expertise: Head of Content Delivery

Caroline graduated from the University of Nottingham with a degree in Chemistry and Molecular Physics. She spent several years working as an Industrial Chemist in the automotive industry before retraining to teach. Caroline has over 12 years of experience teaching GCSE and A-level chemistry and physics. She is passionate about delivering high-quality resources to help students achieve their full potential.