How to Annotate an Extract (Edexcel GCSE English Literature): Revision Note

Exam code: 1ET0

Lottie Bates

Written by: Lottie Bates

Reviewed by: Nick Redgrove

Updated on

In your English Literature exam, you will be given extracts and poems to write about. Annotating them helps you find your best evidence quickly and turn it into a plan before you start writing.

This page shows you how to annotate an extract step by step, what to look for and how to annotate a poem for a comparison question, with worked examples from Macbeth and Simon Armitage’s ‘The Manhunt’.

What does it mean to annotate an extract?

Annotating means picking out the most useful parts of a text and writing short notes beside them. In the exam, your annotations are the first stage of your plan: they show you which evidence you will use and what you will say about it.

Your English Literature exams are closed-book, so the printed extract or poem is the only text in front of you. Annotating it carefully gives you evidence that is ready to use.

How to annotate an extract in your exam

Here is how to annotate an extract. Edexcel GCSE part (a) questions print one for Shakespeare and the 19th-century novel, and these five steps work for both:

  • Read the question first: underline its key words, so you know what you are looking for

  • Read the extract once without writing on it: pay special attention to the short introduction above it, and work out what is happening at this point in the text

  • Underline the details that link to the question: choose four to six short quotations, often a single word or phrase

  • Note what each detail shows: write a few words in the margin about how it links to the question and why the writer chose it

  • Link to the rest of the text: note where else in the text the same idea appears, in a separate plan for part (b). Part (b) asks about “elsewhere” in the text, and your part (a) answer is about the extract only

Keep your annotation symbols simple, and use the same ones every time. Underline a detail, number it, star your best idea and draw an arrow (→) to link two ideas.

Here’s how you might annotate part of a Macbeth extract. The key words in the question and the introduction to the extract are underlined, as well as the textual details selected. The details are numbered, and the table below the extract shows the margin note for each one.

Practice question: Explore how Shakespeare presents the character of Macbeth in this extract. Refer closely to the extract in your answer.

In this extract, Macbeth is alone, thinking about the plan to murder King Duncan.
He’s here in double trust: [1]
First, as I am his kinsman and his subject,
Strong both against the deed; then, as his host,
Who should against his murderer shut the door,
Not bear the knife myself. Besides, this Duncan
Hath borne his faculties so meek, hath been
So clear in his great office, that his virtues
Will plead like angels, trumpet-tongued against [2]
The deep damnation of his taking-off,
And pity, like a naked new-born babe, [3]
Striding the blast, or heaven’s cherubin, horsed
Upon the sightless couriers of the air,
Shall blow the horrid deed in every eye
That tears shall drown the wind. I have no spur
To prick the sides of my intent, but only [4]
Vaulting ambition which o’erleaps itself [5] ★
And falls on th’other.

Detail

Margin note

1. “double trust”

Two reasons not to kill Duncan: he is Duncan’s relative and his host. Loyalty holds back his ambition

2. “his virtues / Will plead like angels”

Duncan is a good king. The angel imagery shows Macbeth knows murder is a sin

3. “naked new-born babe”

A baby seems weak, but here pity is powerful. His conscience is fighting his ambition

4. “I have no spur / To prick the sides of my intent”

A spur makes a horse go faster. Nothing is pushing Macbeth to act → he has no good reason for the murder

5. “Vaulting ambition which o’erleaps itself”

★ Ambition is his only reason to act, but it jumps too high and falls. This foreshadows his downfall → Macbeth can already see where his ambition will lead him

Notes 1 to 3 show what holds Macbeth back, and notes 4 and 5 show that ambition alone is not enough to make him act. Note 5 is starred because it answers the question about his character most directly.

How do you turn your annotations into a plan?

Your annotations are already most of your plan. When you have finished annotating:

  • Star your best idea: the detail that answers the question most directly becomes the core of your thesis statement (your overall answer to the question)

  • Group your notes into three or four main ideas

  • Number the ideas in the order you will write about them

Here is the plan these Macbeth annotations give you:

Thesis: Macbeth is clearly ambitious, but ambition alone is not enough to make him act.
1. His doubts: loyalty, Duncan’s goodness and pity hold him back (notes 1 to 3)
2. Ambition needs a “spur”: nothing is pushing him to act, so he has no good reason for the murder (note 4)
3. Ambition “o’erleaps itself”: the image shows he can see that it will make him fall (note 5)

How long should you spend annotating?

Annotate during your planning time, not as a separate task. A few minutes is usually enough for one extract or poem. Stop once you have enough evidence for your plan: annotation is only useful if it saves you time when you write. The table at the end of this page shows how this fits each question.

Examiner Tips and Tricks

Before you underline anything in the extract, write the focus of the question in two or three words at the top of the extract. Then, each time you underline a detail, ask yourself: does this help me answer the question? If not, leave it.

For example, jotting down “Macbeth: doubt v ambition” at the top of the Macbeth extract reminds you that his character is pulled two ways. That’s why the annotations above include his doubts as well as his ambition. Annotating with the question in mind gives you a balanced argument before you begin writing, and stops you wasting time on details you will never use.

What should you look for when you annotate?

Look for details that help you answer the question, such as:

  • Words and images linked to the focus: for example, anything about ambition, power or kindness, depending on the question

  • Changes and turning points: words such as “But” or “Besides” often signal a change of thought or mood

  • Contrasts: between characters, between ideas, or between how the extract begins and ends

  • The ending: the last lines of an extract or poem often show the writer’s message most clearly

  • Links to the rest of the text: what happens before or after this moment, noted separately for part (b)

What should you avoid?

  • Technique labels on their own: writing “simile” next to a line won’t help you, because the marks are for explaining what the technique does. Note its effect instead, such as “simile: pity seems powerful”

  • Highlighting everything: if you underline or highlight most of the extract, nothing stands out when you plan

  • Writing full sentences in the margins: keep your notes to a few words. A note only needs to remind you of your idea, because you will explain it fully in your essay, and writing sentences uses up planning time

How to annotate a poem for a comparison question

Annotating a poem uses the same five steps as an extract. Poems pack a lot of meaning into a few words, so read slowly and look for who is speaking, repeated words, a shift in tone and the last line. In a comparison question, it’s a great idea to annotate with your second poem in mind. There are two kinds of comparison question, and you annotate them differently.

How do you annotate for the anthology comparison?

In the anthology question, only one poem is printed. You choose the second poem and write about it from memory. It must come from the same collection as the printed poem, and the paper lists the titles in that collection. Annotate the printed poem for the question, including a short note on its context, because context (AO3) is worth 5 of the 20 marks, then:

  • Jot down your second poem: write two or three short quotations from it in the margin, from memory

  • Link the two poems: use an arrow to show where the two poems are similar or different, and add a word or two to say how

The table below shows annotations of Armitage’s ‘The Manhunt’ for a comparison question, with ‘La Belle Dame Sans Merci’ as the second poem. The third column shows the link each note makes to ‘La Belle Dame Sans Merci’.

Question (June 2024): Re-read The Manhunt. Choose one other poem from the Relationships anthology. Compare how a relationship between two people is presented in the two poems. In your answer, you should consider the:

  • poets’ use of language, form and structure

  • influence of the contexts in which the poems were written.

Jotted in the margin from ‘La Belle Dame Sans Merci’: “Alone and palely loitering”, “Thee hath in thrall!”, “And no birds sing.”

Detail

Margin note

Link to ‘La Belle Dame Sans Merci’

“the frozen river which ran through his face”

A scar described as ice. He seems frozen inside as well

→ Different: Keats’s knight is pale and sick because the lady has left him (“Alone and palely loitering”)

“the damaged, porcelain collar-bone”

Porcelain is fragile and easily broken. She handles him with great care

→ Similar: both men are physically weakened

“a sweating, unexploded mine / buried deep in his mind”

★ The worst damage is hidden trauma that could still go off

→ Different: Keats’s knight is damaged by the woman he loves (“Thee hath in thrall!”), while Laura helps him heal

“Then, and only then, did I come close.”

Ends on closeness: her patience is rewarded

→ Different ending: Keats ends with the knight still alone (“And no birds sing.”)

The starred note gives a thesis about a relationship between two people, and the links give you the comparison: both poems show a man left damaged, but in ‘The Manhunt’ the relationship slowly heals him, while in ‘La Belle Dame Sans Merci’ it destroys him.

For your context note, you could jot down that Armitage wrote the poem for a 2007 documentary about soldiers with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and that Laura, a soldier’s wife, read it on screen.

How do you annotate for the unseen comparison?

In the unseen comparison, both poems are printed and you won’t have studied either of them. Annotate them in this order:

  • Read the question first: it names the focus you’re annotating for

  • Read each poem without writing on it: work out who is speaking and what the situation is

  • Read them again and underline: pick out the details that answer the question

  • Annotate both poems for all three bullets: underline details about the ideas, the language, and the form and structure, and note which part of the other poem each one links to

  • Give both poems the same care: answers that are “considerably unbalanced” can’t reach Level 3, and examiners say form and structure were “the most likely missing element”

Annotating in your Edexcel GCSE English Literature exam

In your Edexcel GCSE English Literature exams, you cannot take your set texts in with you. You can only annotate what is printed in the separate Questions and Extracts Booklet, and that is different for each question.

Annotating text under timed conditions takes practice. Use the same steps every time you’re annotating a text. English Literature questions vary in what they print and how long they give you.

This table shows how to annotate a text in each part of your two exam papers:

Paper

Section

What you are given

How to annotate

Paper 1

Section A Shakespeare

Part (a), 20 marks: an extract of about 30 lines, with an introduction line above it. Part (b), 20 marks: the question only

Part (a): annotate the extract only. You have about 55 minutes for both parts, divided equally. Part (b): nothing is printed for it, so underline the theme in the question and plan three or more moments from elsewhere in the play, with a note on context

Paper 1

Section B Post-1914 play or novel

A choice of two questions, each with a short stimulus quotation. No extract

Choose one question and underline its key words, then plan from memory, with notes on context. You have about 50 minutes

Paper 2

Section A 19th-century novel

Part (a), 20 marks: an extract of about 400 words, with an introduction line above it. Part (b), 20 marks: the question only

Part (a): annotate the extract for language, form and structure. You have about 55 minutes for both parts, divided equally. Part (b): plan from memory. Context isn’t assessed in either part

Paper 2

Section B Part 1 Poetry anthology

One named poem, printed in full, and a list of the poems in your collection. Your second poem is not printed

Annotate the printed poem, including a note on its context, then jot down quotations from a second poem in the same collection. You have about 35 minutes

Paper 2

Section B Part 2 Unseen poetry

Two poems you have not seen before, both printed

Annotate both poems for the ideas, the language, and the form and structure, and link them. You have about 45 minutes

Examiner Tips and Tricks

In the unseen poetry section, read the question before the poems. Edexcel sets one question, and it names the focus. Annotate both poems with that focus in mind, and use the three bullets as your checklist, covering the ideas, the language, and the form and structure.

The whole question is a comparison, so give both poems real annotating time. Examiners noted that “some only included examples from a small section of Poem 1”. Draw arrows between linked details, and you’ll have a ready-made comparison before you write. For example, an arrow from a short line in Poem 1 to a long line in Poem 2 gives you a point about form to compare.

Sources

Stanley Wells and Gary Taylor (eds), 2005, The Oxford Shakespeare: The Complete Works (Second Edition), Oxford University Press

Pearson Education. Pearson Edexcel Level 1/Level 2 GCSE (9–1) in English Literature Poetry Anthology. Pearson.

Pearson Edexcel Level 1/Level 2 GCSE (9–1) in English Literature (1ET0) Specification, Issue 2 (June 2019). Pearson.

Pearson Edexcel GCSE (9–1) English Literature (1ET0) Paper 1 Question Paper, June 2022 and June 2025, and Paper 2 Question Paper, June 2024 and June 2025. Pearson.

Pearson Edexcel GCSE (9–1) English Literature (1ET0) Paper 2 Mark Schemes (Results), Summer 2024 and Summer 2025. Pearson.

Pearson Edexcel GCSE (9–1) English Literature (1ET0) Paper 1 Examiners’ Report, June 2025, and Paper 2 Examiners’ Report, June 2025. Pearson.

Unlock more, it's free!

Join the 100,000+ Students that ❤️ Save My Exams

the (exam) results speak for themselves:

Lottie Bates

Author: Lottie Bates

Expertise: Curriculum Expert

Lottie has worked in education as a teacher of History and Classical subjects, supporting students across GCSE, IGCSE and A Level. This has given her a strong understanding of how to help students succeed in exams, particularly when structuring written answers and using specific evidence effectively. She believes that studying history helps students make sense of the modern world, and is passionate about making complex topics clear, accessible and relevant to exam success.

Nick Redgrove

Reviewer: Nick Redgrove

Expertise: Curriculum Expert

Nick is a graduate of the University of Cambridge and King’s College London. He started his career in journalism and publishing, working as an editor on a political magazine and a number of books, before training as an English teacher. After nearly 10 years working in London schools, where he held leadership positions in English departments and within a Sixth Form, he moved on to become an examiner and education consultant. With more than a decade of experience as a tutor, Nick specialises in English, but has also taught Politics, Classical Civilisation and Religious Studies.