Social Cognition (AQA A Level Psychology): Flashcards

Exam code: 7182

1/67

0Still learning

Know0

  • Define perspective-taking.

Cards in this collection (67)

  • Define perspective-taking.

    Perspective-taking is the understanding that other people have thoughts, feelings, viewpoints and attitudes that are different to one's own.

  • True or False?

    Selman believed social and cognitive perspective-taking develop at the same time.

    False.

    Selman believed social perspective-taking develops separately from cognitive perspective-taking, unlike Piaget, who saw them developing synchronously.

  • Which of Piaget's concepts is perspective-taking similar to?

    Egocentrism. An egocentric view limits a child's ability to take on another person's perspective.

  • Selman (1971) asked 60 children aged    years old to explain how people might feel in specific scenarios.

    Selman (1971) asked 60 children aged four to six years old to explain how people might feel in specific scenarios.

  • Describe the scenario used in Selman's (1971) perspective-taking research.

    Children were asked how Holly, her dad and Holly's friend would feel if Holly climbed a tree to rescue a kitten.

  • True or False?

    Selman (1971) found that four-year-olds could easily take another person's perspective.

    False.

    Four-year-olds used egocentric thinking, drawing on information they knew but which other characters could not have known. Selman concluded that the younger the child, the less able they were to take another's perspective.

  • How did Selman's (1976) stages of development emerge?

    From children's typical responses to the perspective-taking scenarios in his earlier research.

  • Describe stage 0 (socially egocentric) of Selman's stages.

    Aged 3–6 years, the child cannot reliably distinguish between their own feelings or viewpoint and other people's.

  • Stage 1 of Selman's stages, social information role-taking, occurs at    years.

    Stage 1 of Selman's stages, social information role-taking, occurs at 6–8 years.

  • What can a child do in Selman's stage 1 (social information role-taking)?

    Distinguish between their own viewpoint and other people's, but only for one perspective at a time.

  • What is the name of stage 2 (8–10 years) in Selman's stages of development?

    Self-reflective role-taking. The child can take on another person's perspective and compare it to their own.

  • True or False?

    In mutual role-taking, a child knows others can understand their point of view.

    True.

    In stage 3 (10–12 years), the child understands that others have different views based on different beliefs, and that others can understand the child's view even if their beliefs differ.

  • Selman's stage 4, social and conventional system role-taking, begins at    years.

    Selman's stage 4, social and conventional system role-taking, begins at 12+ years.

  • What does an adolescent understand in Selman's stage 4?

    That differing viewpoints can be a source of conflict and that systems such as law and order need to be in place to deal with it.

  • What did Gurucharri and Selman (1982) find in their longitudinal study?

    Over five years of interviews about friendship and peer-group dilemmas, children developed perspective-taking in line with and predicted by Selman's levels.

  • What did Epley et al. (2004) find?

    Children aged 4–12, tested alongside adults, showed more egocentric bias the younger they were.

  • How does Marton et al. (2009) support Selman's theory?

    Children aged 8–12 with ADHD did worse than controls on Selman's perspective-taking tasks, showing the theory helps explain atypical development.

  • How could Selman's theory be applied in education?

    It could inform educational plans for children with special needs, e.g. interventions that explicitly teach perspective-taking to children with ADHD rather than assuming it develops with age.

  • Why is Selman's approach described as overly cognitive?

    Social development also involves internal factors such as empathy and emotional self-regulation and external factors such as family climate, so the theory explains only one aspect of a complex process.

  • Why is Selman's theory difficult to test scientifically?

    Variables such as perspective-taking, social competence and empathy are difficult to operationalise and measure.

  • True or False?

    Selman's stage theory can be seen as deterministic.

    True.

    It suggests all children move through the same fixed stages in a set sequence, which may underestimate individual differences and social and emotional factors.

  • Define theory of mind (ToM).

    Theory of mind is the ability to understand that other people have separate mental states, such as thoughts, feelings, ideas, attitudes or knowledge, from one's own.

  • Which aspect of ToM involves predicting behaviour from someone's intentions?

    Understanding intentionality, e.g. predicting James will walk his dog because he is wearing his dog-walking coat. Dennett (1987) saw this as a precursor to ToM.

  • ToM undergoes a significant shift at around age   , when most children begin to pass false belief tasks.

    ToM undergoes a significant shift at around age four, when most children begin to pass false belief tasks.

  • Define theory of mind module (ToMM).

    The theory of mind module is an innate mechanism, proposed by Leslie (1987), that matures in the brain at around 4 years of age and gives ToM a biological basis.

  • What is a false belief task designed to test?

    Whether children understand that others can believe something that is not true. To pass, the child must predict the actions, thoughts or beliefs of another person.

  • In the Smarties test (Hogrefe et al., 1986), what does the box actually contain?

    Pencils. The child is then asked what a friend who has not seen inside will think the box contains.

  • True or False?

    A child who says their friend will think the box contains pencils passes the test.

    False.

    Saying "pencils" fails, as the child assumes others know what they know, showing egocentric thinking. Saying "Smarties" passes.

  • Describe the procedure of the Sally-Anne task (Baron-Cohen et al., 1985).

    Sally puts a marble in her basket and leaves the room. Anne moves the marble to her box. The child is asked where Sally will look for her marble.

  • In the Sally-Anne task, a child passes if they say Sally will look in the   .

    In the Sally-Anne task, a child passes if they say Sally will look in the basket.

  • What samples did Baron-Cohen et al. (1985) use in their Sally-Anne study?

    20 high-functioning children with ASD, with control groups of 27 children without a diagnosis and 14 children with Down syndrome.

  • What did Baron-Cohen et al. (1985) find?

    85% of controls correctly identified where Sally would look, compared with only 20% of children with ASD, suggesting ToM deficits may be involved in ASD.

  • What did Meltzoff (1988) find about 18-month-olds?

    Toddlers who watched adults struggle and drop beads still placed the beads successfully. They imitated what the adult intended, suggesting very young children have a simple ToM.

  • Outline Wimmer and Perner's (1983) false belief task.

    Children heard that Maxi left chocolate in the blue cupboard and his mum moved it to the green cupboard. Nearly all 3-year-olds failed and most 4-year-olds passed.

  • True or False?

    In Baron-Cohen et al.'s (1997) Eyes Task, participants saw whole faces.

    False.

    Participants saw greyscale photographs of the eye region only and chose the emotion word. Adults with ASD and HFASD struggled, suggesting ToM deficits link to ASD.

  • How could ToM research be applied to anti-bullying strategies?

    Sutton et al. (1999) found bullies need skilled social cognition and ToM to manipulate others, so this understanding could be used to address bullying behaviour.

  • What practical application of ToM research supports autistic children?

    Training programmes for social skills. Evaluations report improved social skills scores compared with standard schooling.

  • Why do Bloom and German (2000) argue false belief tasks lack validity?

    Success requires other cognitive abilities, especially memory, and a child can have a well-developed ToM (e.g. enjoying pretend play) and still fail.

  • Bloom and German note that a shortened Sally-Anne story is passed by many   -year-olds.

    Bloom and German note that a shortened Sally-Anne story is passed by many three-year-olds.

  • Why is there no consensus over how ToM develops?

    Perner et al. (2002) believe it develops with all cognitive abilities (a Piagetian view), whereas Astington (1998) suggests it is internalised through early interactions with adults (a Vygotskian view).

  • True or False?

    ToM difficulties are universal among people with ASD.

    False.

    Tager-Flusberg (2007) argues ToM difficulties are neither specific to ASD nor universal within it. Individuals with an Asperger profile pass false belief tasks easily.

  • Give one characteristic of ASD that ToM cannot explain.

    Superior visual attention or highly systematic reasoning, suggesting ToM and ASD are not as closely linked as once believed.

  • Which side of the nature vs nurture debate does the ToMM exemplify?

    Nature, as it suggests ToM is biologically hardwired. Vygotskian approaches suggest nurture is key, indicating an interactionist view.

  • Why is ToM research applied to autism socially sensitive?

    It may unintentionally pathologise neurodivergent individuals. Labelling ToM deficits risks reinforcing stereotypes and stigmatisation.

  • Define mirror neurons.

    Mirror neurons are brain cells that fire both when an individual performs an action and when they watch someone else perform the same action, mirroring motor activity in another individual.

  • How did Rizzolatti et al. (2002) discover mirror neurons?

    While recording electrical activity in a macaque monkey's motor cortex, the same cells fired when the monkey reached for food as when it watched a researcher reach for his lunch.

  • The mirror neuron system has been localised to the    of the brain (Kilner et al., 2009).

    The mirror neuron system has been localised to the inferior frontal gyrus of the brain (Kilner et al., 2009).

  • What did Ramachandran (2011) suggest about mirror neurons and evolution?

    Mirror neurons have shaped human evolution. Complex social interactions require a brain system for understanding intention, emotion and perspective, without which humans could not live in large groups.

  • True or False?

    Mirror neurons only reflect behaviour that has actually been observed.

    False.

    Gallese and Goldman (1998) suggest they may also signal another person's intention, e.g. firing at the mere thought of a teacher about to clap.

  • What evidence links mirror neurons to empathy?

    fMRI research (Gallese, 2001) showed the anterior cingulate cortex and inferior frontal gyrus were activated when participants observed emotions in other people.

  • How might mirror neurons provide a neurological basis for theory of mind?

    They are linked to emotional observation and enactment, enabling a child to understand that other people may feel differently from how they feel.

  • How might mirror neurons help a child understand being part of a group?

    They may help the child learn how to navigate social interactions and understand social hierarchies and group systems.

  • What did Oberman and Ramachandran (2007) say mirror neurons are necessary for?

    The normal development of recognition, imitation, theory of mind, empathy and language.

  • Define the 'broken mirror' theory of ASD.

    The 'broken mirror' theory (Ramachandran & Oberman, 2006) proposes that dysfunction in the mirror neuron system prevents a developing child from imitating and understanding social behaviour in others.

  • How does the 'broken mirror' theory say mirror neuron dysfunction manifests?

    In infancy, children later diagnosed with ASD mimic adult behaviour less. Later, they have difficulties reading social roles, intentions and emotions.

  • Dapretto et al. (2006) found children with autism showed no mirror neuron activity while observing and imitating   .

    Dapretto et al. (2006) found children with autism showed no mirror neuron activity while observing and imitating facial expressions.

  • What did Rizzolatti and Fabbri-Destro's (2008) review conclude?

    Mirror neurons let an observer understand the intention behind an observed act as well as its goal, and a deficit in the mirror mechanism underlies some aspects of ASD.

  • What did Haker et al. (2012) find when studying contagious yawning?

    Participants watching films of people yawning showed considerable activity in Brodmann's area 9 in the right frontal lobe, an area believed to be rich in mirror neurons.

  • True or False?

    Mouras et al. (2008) found mirror neuron activity occurred after sexual arousal.

    False.

    Activity in the pars opercularis occurred before arousal, consistent with mirror neurons producing the perspective-taking that made the material arousing.

  • How does Stuss et al. (2001) support mirror neuron theory?

    People with frontal lobe damage struggled to understand others' emotions and intentions, although this shows the importance of the region rather than of mirror neurons specifically.

  • What is a possible practical application of mirror neuron research?

    If mirror neuron dysfunction contributes to ASD, it could inform therapeutic strategies for autistic people, although mixed evidence (Hadjikhani, 2007) makes this speculative.

  • Why did Hickok (2009) question whether mirror neurons exist in humans?

    We only know what mirror neurons should do in theory, so their existence is assumed rather than demonstrated, although single-cell recordings during surgery (Mukamel et al., 2010) suggest isolated mirror neurons exist.

  • Evidence for human mirror neurons comes from brain scanning, which identifies activity in    of the brain, not individual cells.

    Evidence for human mirror neurons comes from brain scanning, which identifies activity in regions of the brain, not individual cells.

  • According to Hickok, why might the role of mirror neurons be overstated?

    Their activity may reflect using others' behaviour to plan our own actions, rather than understanding the cognitions behind theirs.

  • Why can mirror neuron activity not be measured at a cellular level in humans?

    For ethical reasons, electrodes cannot be inserted into the human brain, so researchers must infer mirror neuron activity from regional activation.

  • True or False?

    Mirror neuron theory is biologically deterministic.

    True.

    It implies empathy, imitation and understanding intentions are pre-programmed, leaving little conscious control and challenging free will.

  • Why do critics say an interactionist view of mirror neurons is needed?

    Mirror neuron theory leans on nature, treating social understanding as innate, but nurture, especially early social experiences, plays a crucial role in developing ToM and empathy.

Sign up to unlock flashcards

or