The Occupation of the Ruhr & Hyperinflation, 1923 (Edexcel IGCSE History: Paper 1: Depth Studies): Revision Note

Exam code: 4HI1

Zoe Wade

Written by: Zoe Wade

Reviewed by: Bridgette Barrett

Updated on

Summary

  • Germany was close to bankruptcy after the war

    • Reparations and the loss of coal and iron regions made recovery even harder

  • After Germany fell behind on its reparations payments, French and Belgian troops occupied the Ruhr in January 1923

  • The government ordered passive resistance and paid the striking workers by printing more money, which turned high inflation into hyperinflation

    • By November 1923, a loaf of bread cost about 201 billion marks

  • Savers, pensioners and the middle class lost the most

    • Borrowers, farmers and property owners often gained from the crisis

  • The year 1923 also brought the Munich Putsch, so a series of overlapping crises badly damaged middle-class trust in the Republic

Examiner Tips and Tricks

Many students confuse hyperinflation with the Depression. If you confuse the two in your exam, you will be limiting how many marks you receive for your own knowledge. Whilst both resulted in significant economic hardship for Germans:

  • Hyperinflation happened in 1923 in Germany: prices rose out of control because the government printed too much money

  • The Great Depression began in 1929 and hit many countries: in Germany it brought mass unemployment and deflation (falling prices), not hyperinflation

The French occupation of the Ruhr, 1923

Why did France occupy the Ruhr?

  • Germany was near bankruptcy by 1918

    • The Treaty of Versailles added reparations while taking away income-producing regions such as the Saar and the Silesian coalfields

  • The Allies needed the reparations in order to repay their own war debts to the USA

    • They refused to reduce Germany's payments

  • Germany missed payments throughout 1922 and defaulted again in December 1922

The occupation and passive resistance

  • In January 1923, French and Belgian troops seized the Ruhr, which was Germany's coal, iron and steel heartland, in order to take goods instead of cash

  • Germany could not resist militarily with an army of only 100,000 men

  • The government called for passive resistance, which meant:

    • workers went on strike

    • Germans refused to work for or serve the occupying troops

    • Some Germans went further and sabotaged railways, mines and factories

  • The occupying forces killed more than 100 Germans

    • The troops did not leave until 1925, after the Dawes Plan

The effects of the occupation

  • In the short term, the Weimar government gained popularity

    • It appeared patriotic for standing up to France

  • In the longer term, the occupation did serious economic damage

    • Germany lost the output and the tax revenue of the Ruhr

    • The government's approach caused hyperinflation

The causes of hyperinflation

  • Germany had paid for the First World War by borrowing and printing money rather than by raising taxes

    • The mark was already weak in 1918

  • Between 1919 and 1923, the government raised only about a quarter of the money it needed

    • It printed banknotes to fill the gap

  • After the occupation of the Ruhr, the government printed even more to pay the Ruhr strikers

    • At the same time, the tax revenue from the Ruhr disappeared

  • By 1923, the government was running about 300 paper mills and around 2,000 printing works non-stop, purely to produce banknotes

  • Germany printed far more banknotes than it had gold or goods to back them

    • With so many notes in circulation, each one was worth less

    • Prices spiralled out of control

Examiner Tips and Tricks

Inflation can be a tricky concept to understand, especially how it can cause money to lose all its value.

Imagine that you have a rare diamond necklace. It would cost a lot of money to purchase the necklace because it is so rare.

Now imagine that someone made 100 more copies of the diamond necklace. The necklace is now not as rare, meaning it would not be worth as much as it was previously.

Applying this concept to money: the more currency there is in circulation, the less it is worth. So when the German government printed huge amounts of money in 1923, each mark bought less and less, and prices spiralled out of control.

The collapse of the mark

The cost of a loaf of bread in Berlin

Date

Cost

December 1918

0.54 marks

December 1922

163 marks

January 1923

250 marks

September 1923

1.5 million marks

November 1923

201 billion marks

The effects of hyperinflation on Germany

Daily life

  • Prices rose so fast that:

    • shops changed them several times a day

    • employers paid workers twice a day so that they could spend their wages before they lost value

Who lost out from hyperinflation?

  • Millions of Germans fell into poverty

  • People on fixed incomes, especially pensioners, suffered the most

    • This is because their money did not keep pace with prices

  • Hyperinflation wiped out people's savings and insurance policies

  • The middle class was ruined

    • Many of its members blamed the Weimar government, even though the economic problems had begun before the Republic existed

Who gained from hyperinflation?

  • Borrowers could repay their loans and mortgages in money that was now almost worthless

  • People who owned land or property kept their wealth, because its value rose with inflation

  • Farmers did well, because they could sell food at ever-higher prices

  • Tourists benefited from the crisis as their money was worth more in Germany

A diagram showing the causes and consequences of hyperinflation. Causes: Treaty of Versailles, France’s invasion of the Ruhr, printing more money. Consequences: unemployment, loss of savings and pensions, debts from loans decreased, and increased support in extremist parties.
A diagram illustrating the causes and consequences of hyperinflation

Examiner Tips and Tricks

Examiners are looking for students to understand both sides of the argument, particularly in 16-mark questions. Therefore, it is important to recognise that hyperinflation had winners and losers to give balance to your answer.

How far was 1923 the Weimar Republic's greatest crisis?

Arguments that 1923 was the greatest crisis

  • Germany faced three crises at the same time:

    • The occupation of the Ruhr

    • The economic collapse of hyperinflation

    • An armed revolt in the Munich Putsch of November 1923

  • Hyperinflation destroyed the savings of the middle class, which was the group whose support the Republic most needed

  • The Republic looked powerless

    • It could neither defend the Ruhr nor protect its citizens' money

  • The crisis left a lasting legacy, because middle-class bitterness later helped the Nazis gain power

Arguments that 1923 was not the greatest crisis

  • The Republic survived 1923 and then recovered under Gustav Stresemann

  • The revolution of 1918 and the revolts of 1919 to 1920 had also threatened the Republic's very existence

  • Some groups, such as borrowers, farmers and property owners, actually benefited in 1923

  • The crisis that finally destroyed the Republic came later, with the Great Depression

Conclusions

  • The year 1923 brought the most concentrated set of crises of the Republic's early period

    • It did lasting damage to public confidence

    • It increased support for political extremism

  • However, the Republic survived and recovered under Gustav Stresemann

Worked Example

Explain two effects of hyperinflation on the German people in the years 1923–1924

(8)

Partial answer:

One effect of hyperinflation was that it destroyed the savings of middle-class Germans. Money held in bank accounts, pensions and insurance policies lost almost all of its value, because prices rose far faster than the amount of money people had. By November 1923 a loaf of bread in Berlin cost about 201 billion marks. This means that savings that had once been substantial could no longer buy a single meal. This mattered in the longer term because many middle-class families who had felt financially secure were suddenly pushed into poverty, and they blamed the Weimar government for their losses. This bitterness weakened middle-class support for the Republic.

Examiner Tips and Tricks

An answer that deals with only one effect is capped at 4 marks.

A strong approach to this question would be one positive effect of hyperinflation and one negative effect. However, you would be credited for either two positive, or two negative, effects.

Support each effect with a precise detail, such as a price figure, and then trace it forward to an outcome.

Unlock more, it's free!

Join the 100,000+ Students that ❤️ Save My Exams

the (exam) results speak for themselves:

Zoe Wade

Author: Zoe Wade

Expertise: Curriculum Expert

Zoe has worked in education for 10 years as a teaching assistant and a teacher. This has given her an in-depth perspective on how to support all learners to achieve to the best of their ability. She has been the Lead of Key Stage 4 History, showing her expertise in the Edexcel GCSE syllabus and how best to revise. Ever since she was a child, Zoe has been passionate about history. She believes now, more than ever, the study of history is vital to explaining the ever-changing world around us. Zoe’s focus is to create accessible content that breaks down key historical concepts and themes to achieve GCSE success.

Bridgette Barrett

Reviewer: Bridgette Barrett

Expertise: Development Editor

After graduating with a degree in Geography, Bridgette completed a PGCE over 30 years ago. She later gained an MA Learning, Technology and Education from the University of Nottingham focussing on online learning. At a time when the study of geography has never been more important, Bridgette is passionate about creating content which supports students in achieving their potential in geography and builds their confidence.