The Treaty of Versailles & German Reactions, 1919 (Edexcel IGCSE History: Paper 1: Depth Studies): Revision Note

Exam code: 4HI1

Zoe Wade

Written by: Zoe Wade

Reviewed by: Bridgette Barrett

Updated on

Summary

  • Germany expected a fair peace based on Woodrow Wilson's Fourteen Points

    • However, the Treaty of Versailles, signed in June 1919, was harsh

  • Germany could not take part in the negotiations

    • Its representatives called the treaty a "diktat", meaning a dictated peace

  • The terms:

    • stripped Germany of territory, colonies and armed forces

    • forced it to accept War Guilt under Article 231

    • made Germany pay reparations, later fixed at of £6,600 million

  • Most Germans rejected the treaty as unfair

  • The treaty did its worst damage to German politics, because opponents branded the politicians who signed it as the "November Criminals"

    • Extremist parties used the "stab in the back" myth against them

The terms of the Treaty of Versailles

The motives and aims of the peacemakers

  • Woodrow Wilson of the USA wanted a fair settlement

    • He feared that harsh terms would make Germany want revenge

    • No fighting had occurred on US soil

  • Georges Clemenceau of France wanted a harsh treaty

    • Most of the fighting had taken place in France

    • France and Germany had a long history of conflict with each other

  • David Lloyd George of Britain took a middle line between the USA and France

    • He wanted to avoid another war, so he didn't want to be too harsh

    • However, his government won the 1918 election by promising to "squeeze the German lemon"

Infographic titled “The Aims of the ‘Big Three’ at the Treaty of Versailles”: Clemenceau, France (“Tiger”), wanted Germany punished; Wilson, USA (“Schoolmaster of Politics”), supported the Fourteen Points and League; Lloyd George, Britain (“Welsh Wizard”), sought a middle ground.
An image showing the aims of the Big Three at Versailles

Territorial terms

  • Germany lost land to several neighbours:

    • Alsace-Lorraine went to France

    • Eupen and Malmedy went to Belgium

    • Posen and West Prussia went to Poland

      • This created a "Polish Corridor" that gave Poland access to the sea but cut East Prussia off from the rest of Germany

  • Danzig became a free city outside German control

  • The treaty demilitarised the Rhineland

  • The coal-rich Saar was run by the League of Nations for 15 years and France took its coal

  • In total, Germany lost about 13% of its European territory

    • The territorial loss also equated to losing roughly half of its iron reserves and about 15% of its coal

  • It lost all 11 of its colonies which the League of Nations handed to the Allies to run as mandates

  • After plebiscites:

    • Upper Silesia was split between Germany and Poland in 1922

    • North Schleswig joined Denmark

Military terms

  • The treaty capped the German army at 100,000 men and banned conscription

  • It limited the navy to:

    • six battleships

    • six cruisers

    • twelve destroyers

    • twelve torpedo boats

  • It also banned Germany from having tanks, submarines or an air force

Financial and moral terms

  • Article 231, the War Guilt Clause, forced Germany to accept sole blame for causing the war

  • In 1921, the Allies fixed reparations at £6,600 million

    • This was about 132 billion gold marks

German reactions to the Treaty of Versailles

The diktat

  • The Allies shut Germany out of the negotiations and simply presented it with the finished terms

  • The German government at first refused to sign

    • The Allies threatened to restart the war, so Germany signed under protest on 28 June 1919

  • German representatives called the treaty a "shameful diktat", because they saw it as a dictated and humiliating peace

War Guilt and the "November Criminals"

  • Article 231 caused the deepest anger

    • Germans believed that all the powers should share the blame for the war

  • Opponents branded the politicians who signed the treaty as the "November Criminals" and treated them with contempt

  • Extremist politicians spread the "stab in the back" myth

    • This is the idea that Germany's own government had betrayed it, rather than that its army had lost on the battlefield

    • Nationalists assassinated politicians who defended the decision to sign, including Erzberger in 1921

Examiner Tips and Tricks

Examiners reward precise terms. Use "diktat" and "November Criminals" in your answers and explain what each meant rather than just calling the treaty unfair.

If you struggle to remember these, you could create a glossary with these terms and their definitions.

Why was the Treaty of Versailles so unpopular in Germany?

Moral grievance

  • Germans saw War Guilt under Article 231 as an unjust humiliation

    • They resented the fact that it justified the unreasonable reparations

  • The "diktat" gave Germany no say in the settlement

    • They had expected a peace based on Wilson's Fourteen Points

      • When this did not happen, many Germans felt betrayed

Economic grievance

  • Reparations placed a huge burden on an economy that was already close to bankruptcy

    • Many Germans believed that the Allies had designed the bill to destroy the country for a generation

  • The land Germany lost contained important coalfields and iron reserves

    • This made the reparations bill even harder to pay

National grievance

  • The treaty placed millions of German-speakers under foreign rule

    • This left them feeling like they did not belong

  • The 100,000-man army left Germany feeling defenceless

    • The other powers did not disarm, which made this feeling worse

Political grievance

  • Germans took out their anger on the Weimar politicians who had signed the treaty

    • This gave the Republic's enemies, including Hitler and the Nazi Party, a lasting propaganda weapon

Examiner Tips and Tricks

In a 16-mark essay, you can turn these grievances into four ready-made paragraphs. Set out your criterion, for example how many Germans each grievance affected or how long it lasted, and use it to justify which mattered most.

Worked Example

Study Extract C.

Extract C: From a history of Germany, published in 2004.

"No one was prepared for the peace terms… All of this was greeted with incredulous horror by the majority of Germans. The sense of outrage and disbelief… was almost universal. Germany's international strength and prestige had been on an upward course since unification in 1871… now, suddenly, Germany had been brutally expelled from the ranks of the Great Powers and covered in what they considered to be undeserved shame. Versailles was condemned as a dictated peace, unilaterally imposed without the possibility of negotiation."

What impression does the author give about the Treaty of Versailles?

You must use Extract C to explain your answer.

(6)

Partial answer:

The author gives the impression that the Treaty of Versailles came as a total shock to Germany and that Germans felt it was a deep and undeserved humiliation. They say that Germany was "brutally expelled from the ranks of the Great Powers and covered in… undeserved shame". The emotive words "brutally" and "undeserved" make the treaty sound cruel and unfair, which is the view the author wants the reader to take.

Examiner Tips and Tricks

To reach the top level for this question, you must analyse the author's choices: comment on the effect of one or two emotive words, and explain what the author has chosen to stress. You can also point out what the author has left out, but only if you explain how the omission strengthens the impression.

Unlock more, it's free!

Join the 100,000+ Students that ❤️ Save My Exams

the (exam) results speak for themselves:

Zoe Wade

Author: Zoe Wade

Expertise: Curriculum Expert

Zoe has worked in education for 10 years as a teaching assistant and a teacher. This has given her an in-depth perspective on how to support all learners to achieve to the best of their ability. She has been the Lead of Key Stage 4 History, showing her expertise in the Edexcel GCSE syllabus and how best to revise. Ever since she was a child, Zoe has been passionate about history. She believes now, more than ever, the study of history is vital to explaining the ever-changing world around us. Zoe’s focus is to create accessible content that breaks down key historical concepts and themes to achieve GCSE success.

Bridgette Barrett

Reviewer: Bridgette Barrett

Expertise: Development Editor

After graduating with a degree in Geography, Bridgette completed a PGCE over 30 years ago. She later gained an MA Learning, Technology and Education from the University of Nottingham focussing on online learning. At a time when the study of geography has never been more important, Bridgette is passionate about creating content which supports students in achieving their potential in geography and builds their confidence.