Quadratic Equation Methods (Cambridge (CIE) IGCSE Additional Maths): Revision Note

Exam code: 0606

Dan Finlay

Written by: Dan Finlay

Reviewed by: Lucy Kirkham

Updated on

Quadratic equation methods

If you have to solve a quadratic equation but are not told which method to use, here is a guide as to what to do

When should I solve by factorisation?

  • When the question asks to solve by factorisation

    • For example, part (a) Factorise 6x2 + 7x – 3, part (b) Solve  6x2 + 7x – 3 = 0

  • When solving two-term quadratic equations

    • For example, solve x2 – 4x = 0

      • …by taking out a common factor of x to get x(x – 4) = 0

      • ...giving x = 0 and x = 4

    • For example, solve x2 – 9 = 0

      • …using the difference of two squares to factorise it as (x + 3)(x – 3) = 0

      • ...giving x = -3 and x = 3

      • (Or by rearranging to x2 = 9 and using ±√ to get x =  = ±3)

  • When possible, factorising is usually the easiest way to solve a quadratic equation

    • Even on the calculator paper, if you can spot a factorisation quickly, use this approach

When should I use the quadratic formula?

  • If the coefficients (a, b and c) are large, factorising and completing the square can be difficult or slow

    • The quadratic formula lends itself to using a calculator

    • Some modern calculators will solve quadratic equations directly, with no need to use the formula

  • Typically the quadratic formula would be used when rounding is involved

    • For example, if a question says to leave solutions correct to 2 decimal places or 3 significant figures

  • However, the quadratic formula is also useful when answers need to be exact

    • The formula lends itself to surd form after simplifying some of the values within it

    • e.g.  x=4±424×2×(2)2×2=4±324=4±424=1±2

  • If in doubt, use the quadratic formula - it always works

When should I solve by completing the square?

  • A question may direct you to solve by completing the square

    • e.g.  Part (a) says to complete the square and part (b) says 'hence' or 'use part (a)' to solve ...

  • Completing the square may have already happened for other reasons

    • e.g.  Completing the square allows the coordinates of the turning point on a quadratic graph to be found easily

    • If this has been done in an earlier part of a question, use it to solve the quadratic equation

Examiner Tips and Tricks

  • Calculators can solve quadratic equations

    • Double check you've entered the equation correctly, in the correct format

    • Use this feature to check your answers where possible

    • If the solutions on your calculator are whole numbers or fractions (with no square roots), this means the quadratic equation does factorise

Worked Example

a) Solve x27x+2=0, giving your answers correct to 2 decimal places
 

“Correct to 2 decimal places” suggests using the quadratic formula and/or a calculator
For accuracy, it is a good idea to use both - use the formula and calculator as normal first
Then use the quadratic solver feature to check your solutions

Substitute a = 1, b = -7 and c = 2 into the formula, putting brackets around any negative numbers
 

  x=(7)±(7)24×1×22×1

Use a calculator to find each solution
 

x = 6.70156… or 0.2984...
 

Round your final answers to 2 decimal places

x = 6.70 or x = 0.30

If your calculator has a quadratic equation solver, use it to check your answers

(b) Solve 16x282x+45=0
 

Method 1
The coefficients are large and so the factorisation, even if possible, is hard to spot
Therefore, one method to use is the quadratic formula - it always works!
The solution below is the manual way to use a calculator, but as above, if your calculator has a quadratic solver feature, you may use that
Substitute a = 16, b = -82 and c = 45 into the formula, putting brackets around any negative numbers

x=(82)±(82)24×16×452×16

Use a calculator to find each solution

x92  or x58

Method 2
If you do persevere with the factorisation then use that method instead
 

16x282x+45=(2x9)(8x5)=0
 

Set the first bracket equal to zero
 

2x9=0
 

Add 9 to both sides then divide by 2
 

2x=9x=92

Set the second bracket equal to zero
 

8x5=0
 

Add 5 to both sides then divide by 8
 

8x=5x=58

x92  or x58

 

(c) By writing x2+6x+5 in the form (x+p)2+q, solve x2+6x+5=0
 

Notice this question does not use the phrase 'completing the square' but shows the form of it instead
Find p (by halving the middle number)
 

p=62=3
 

Write x2 + 6x as (x + p)2 - p2
 

x2+6x=(x+3)232=(x+3)29
 

Replace x2 + 6x with (x + 3)2 – 9 in the equation
 

(x+3)29+5=0(x+3)24=0

Make x the subject of the equation (start by adding 4 to both sides)
 

(x+3)2=4
 

Take square roots of both sides (include a ± sign to get both solutions)
 

x+3=±4=±2
 

Subtract 3 from both sides
 

x=±23
 

Find each solution separately using + first, then - second

x = - 5, x = - 1

Even though the quadratic factorises to (x + 5)(x + 1), this is not the method asked for in the question

Hidden quadratic equations

How do I spot a hidden quadratic equation?

  • Hidden quadratics have the same structure as quadratic equations

    • a(something)2 + b(something) + c = 0

  • Here are some hidden quadratics based on x2 - 3x - 4 = 0:

    • x43x24=0 (a quadratic in x2)

    • x163x84=0 (a quadratic in x8)

    • x3x4=0 (a quadratic in x because (x)2 is x)

    • x233x134=0 (a quadratic in x13because (x13)2=x23)

  • Sometimes, a change of base helps to spot a hidden quadratic

    • e.g. the first term in 4x3×2x4=0 can be written 4x=(22)x=22x=(2x)2

      • (2x)23×2x4=0 is a quadratic in 2x

  • Trigonometric equations can also be in the form of a quadratic

    • e.g. 3tan2 3x+4tan 3x6=0 is a quadratic in tan 3x

How do I solve a hidden quadratic equation?

  • You can solve a(...)2 + b(...) + c = 0 with a substitution

    • Substitute "u = ..." and rewrite the equation in terms of u only 

      • au2 + bu + c = 0

    • Solve this easier quadratic equation in u to get u = p and u = q

    • Replace the u's with their substitution to get two equations

      • "... = p" and "... = q"

    • Solve these two separate equations to find all the solutions

      • These equations might have multiple solutions or none at all!

  • e.g. to solve x4 - 3x2 - 4 = 0

    • Substitute u = x2 to get u2 - 3u - 4 = 0

    • The solutions are u = 4 or u = -1,

    • Rewrite in terms of x: 

      • x2 = 4 or x2 = -1,

    • Solve to give x = -2 or x = 2 (no solutions from x2 = -1 as you can't square-root a negative)

Examiner Tips and Tricks

  • While the substitution method is not compulsory, beware of skipping steps

    • e.g. it is incorrect to "jump" from the solutions of x2 -3x - 4 = 0 to the solutions of (x + 5)2 - 3(x + 5) - 4 = 0 by "adding 5 to them"

      • the substitution method shows you end up subtracting 5

Worked Example

(a) Solve  x817x4+16=0

This is a quadratic in x4 so let u = x4

u217u+16=0

Solve this simpler quadratic equation, for example by factorisation

(u16)(u1)=0 

Write out the u solutions

u=16   or   u = 1

Replace u with x4

x4=16   or   x4=1

Solve these separate equations (remember an even power gives two solutions)

x=±2  or  x=±1

Write your solutions out (it's good practice to write them in numerical order) 

x=2, 1, 1 or 2

(b) Solve  xx6=0

This is a quadratic in √x so let u = √x

u2u6=0

Solve this simpler quadratic equation, for example by factorisation

(u3)(u+2)=0u=3 or u=2

Replace u with √x and solve

x=3x=9x=2 has no solutions as x0

You can check your solutions by substituting them back into the equation If you put x = 4 as a solution by mistake then substituting will spot this error

996=0446=40

x=9

Unlock more, it's free!

Join the 100,000+ Students that ❤️ Save My Exams

the (exam) results speak for themselves:

Build on this topic

Dan Finlay

Author: Dan Finlay

Expertise: Portfolio Lead

Dan graduated from the University of Oxford with a First class degree in mathematics. As well as teaching maths for over 8 years, Dan has marked a range of exams for Edexcel, tutored students and taught A Level Accounting. Dan has a keen interest in statistics and probability and their real-life applications.

Lucy Kirkham

Reviewer: Lucy Kirkham

Expertise: Content Creator

Lucy has been a passionate Maths teacher for over 12 years, teaching maths across the UK and abroad helping to engage, interest and develop confidence in the subject at all levels.Working as a Head of Department and then Director of Maths, Lucy has advised schools and academy trusts in both Scotland and the East Midlands, where her role was to support and coach teachers to improve Maths teaching for all.