Differential Impacts & Tectonic Hazard Patterns (Edexcel A Level Geography): Revision Note
Exam code: 9GE0
Tectonic Hazard Trends Since 1960
Global disaster trends
The number of recorded disasters has increased significantly since 1960
There are a number of reasons for this including:
Increased population - the world population has grown from 3 billion to over 8 billion since 1960
This means more people are likely to be impacted by any hazard event
Increased population density in urban and coastal areas increases the vulnerable population
Increased monitoring and reporting means more hazard events are recorded
Most of the increase has been the result of floods and extreme weather

Tectonic disaster trends
The number of tectonic disasters has fluctuated since 1960 but has generally remained steady
The slight increase in a number of earthquake disasters does not mean there have been more earthquakes or higher magnitude earthquakes. It results from:
Greater urbanisation leads to higher population densities and increased building density
Population growth means more people are living in earthquake-prone regions

Number of deaths
The number of deaths resulting from all hazards has decreased since 1960
This is the result of:
Improved building construction, design and materials
Increased monitoring
Greater preparation and planning - hazard mapping, land use zoning, evacuation planning
Education - earthquake drills
Improved warning systems
Increased development

The number of deaths from tectonic hazards fluctuates depending on a range of factors including:
Magnitude
Level of development
Location

1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020
The impact of a mega-disaster such as the Indian Ocean earthquake and tsunami may skew the overall trend because it leads to so many deaths
Volcanic eruptions are less frequent than earthquakes and deaths from eruptions are now rare due to improved monitoring, exclusion zones and evacuation plans
Numbers affected
‘Numbers affected’ is another impact metric, alongside deaths and economic cost
It counts people who survive but are injured, made homeless, displaced or left needing aid
It is usually far larger than the death toll, capturing the full human scale of a disaster
Numbers affected are often highest in emerging and developing countries, where many people lose homes and livelihoods even when deaths are kept low
Insert image: People affected by earthquakes and volcanic activity worldwide
Image caption: People affected by earthquakes and volcanic activity worldwide, 1960–2023. Source: EM-DAT, CRED (via Our World in Data).
The graph shows how many people were affected by tectonic hazards (earthquakes and volcanic activity) each year
Most years fall between about 1 and 5 million, but occasional spikes reach tens of millions
The spikes occur when a large earthquake strikes a densely populated area:
2008 — the Sichuan earthquake in China affected around 46 million people
2023 — the Türkiye–Syria earthquakes affected tens of millions
Unlike deaths, which have fallen since 1960, numbers affected have not fallen — population growth and urbanisation put more people in earthquake-prone regions
Economic cost trends
The economic cost of disasters has increased since 1960
As countries develop the cost of repairing infrastructure and rebuilding increases
Increased wealth means people have more possessions and property to be damaged and destroyed
Infrastructure is more sophisticated and expensive to replace, for example, electric grids
As more people are affected the cost increases

The economic impact of disasters is affected by whether the country is developing (LIC) or developed (HIC)
The economic cost in US$ tends to be higher in developed countries
The impact on the GDP tends to be much greater in developing and emerging countries
Comparison of Costs LIC Vs HIC
Event | Estimated cost (US$) | % GDP |
|---|---|---|
Gorkha earthquake, Nepal (2015) | 10 billion | 33% |
Tohoku earthquake and tsunami, Japan (2011) | 360 billion | 4% |
Accuracy and reliability of data
The trends associated with all disasters are complex
They are affected by a wide range of factors
When disasters occur the data collected may not be accurate due to:
The focus when a disaster strikes and in the weeks that follow is on search, rescue and recovery
In remote rural areas it may be difficult to collect data
Skills — interrogating the data (skill 6)
The trends on this page come from large secondary datasets you can explore yourself:
EM-DAT — the Emergency Events Database, run by CRED (the Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters): frequency, deaths, numbers affected and economic cost by disaster type and country
USGS — the United States Geological Survey: global earthquake catalogue, magnitudes and the “Did You Feel It?” intensity data
UN GAR — the United Nations Global Assessment Report on Disaster Risk Reduction: modelled risk and exposure datasets
These datasets can be used to plot change over time and to test whether rising disaster counts reflect more hazards or better recording
Tectonic Mega-Disasters Case Studies
Tectonic mega-disasters are high impact, high magnitude hazard events which affect several countries either directly or indirectly
Examples of mega-disasters include:
Asian tsunami (2004)
Eyjafjallajokull eruption, Iceland (2010)
Tohoku earthquake and tsunami, Japan (2011)
Table of Impacts
Event | Impact |
|---|---|
Asian tsunami |
|
Eyjafjallajokull (Global interdependence) |
|
Tohoku earthquake and tsunami (Energy policy) |
|
Unlock more, it's free!
Was this revision note helpful?
Build on this topic