Planning an Investigation (Edexcel IGCSE Biology): Revision Note
Exam code: 4BI1
How to write a method
A planning question asks you to describe how you would carry out a specific investigation, using a sequence of instructions that someone else could follow
Write your method as a set of steps, in the order you would do them
A good method includes:
how to set up and use the apparatus
the quantities to use, with units, e.g. 25 cm³ of water
how to change the independent variable, and the range of values to use
how and when to measure the dependent variable, and which apparatus to use
which variables to keep constant, and how
how many times to repeat each reading
In Edexcel papers, this is tested by "Design an investigation" questions worth 6 marks
Use CORMS to plan your answer:
C: what you will change (the independent variable) and the range of values
O: the organisms you will use, all of the same species, age or size
R: repeat each value and calculate a mean
M: what you will measure (the dependent variable), how, and after what time
S: how you will keep two other variables the same
Examiner reports show that students lose marks by:
writing "change the light intensity" without saying how it will be changed
not saying how the dependent variable will be measured
not giving a time for each measurement
Worked Example
Design an investigation to find out how light intensity affects the rate of photosynthesis in pondweed.
[6]
Zero-mark answer:
Independent variable: light intensity
Dependent variable: rate of photosynthesis
Apparatus: lamp, ruler, beaker, pond weed, stopwatch
Full-mark answer:
Any six from:
C: Place a lamp at 10 cm, 20 cm, 30 cm, 40 cm and 50 cm from the pondweed, measuring the distance with a ruler
O: Use pieces of the same species of pondweed, each 5 cm long
R: Repeat the count three times at each distance and calculate a mean
M: Count the number of bubbles released
in 1 minute, after leaving the pondweed for 2 minutes at each new distance
S: Keep the temperature the same by standing the boiling tube in a water bath at 25 °C
Keep the carbon dioxide concentration the same by using the same volume and concentration of sodium hydrogencarbonate solution
[6 marks]
Examiner Tips and Tricks
The zero-mark answer is a list of headings and equipment, not a method. It repeats "light intensity" and "rate of photosynthesis" from the question without saying how light intensity will be changed or exactly what will be measured.
The full-mark answer covers every part of CORMS: what is changed and its values, the organism, the repeats, what is measured and over what time, and two variables kept the same. Each point is specific enough for another student to follow.
Choosing & justifying apparatus
When describing apparatus choices in practical questions, you should name the specific piece of apparatus
For example, a measuring cylinder, not "something to measure volume"
Common apparatus items for measuring different variables include:
volume: measuring cylinder, gas syringe or pipette
mass: electronic balance
length / short distances: ruler
time: stopwatch
temperature: thermometer
Choose apparatus that is precise enough for the variable being measured
For example, for measuring 2 cm3, a 5 cm3 syringe will be more appropriate than a 100 cm3 measuring cylinder
When a question asks you to justify your choice, give a reason linked to the experiment
Use a gas syringe to measure oxygen production rather than counting bubbles; this is because bubbles vary in size, while a gas syringe measures the volume of gas produced, giving a more accurate measurement
Use a temperature-controlled water-bath rather than a beaker of hot water; this is because a beaker of hot water cools down over time, while a water-bath maintains a constant temperature, so this control variable won't affect the results
Taking readings to the correct precision
When it comes to reading results and recording measurements correctly, you need to consider how to determine the size of a single small division on a scale
Sometimes you may not know the size of a single small division on a scale, for example, in a diagram within an exam question
In order to determine the size of a single division you need to:
find two labelled values on the scale, e.g. 20 and 30
count the small divisions between them, e.g. 5
divide the difference by the number of divisions, e.g. 10 ÷ 5 = 2 units per division
How to read a scale to the resolution of the instrument:
Once you know what one small division is worth, you can read to the nearest line or half-division
For example, on a thermometer marked every 1 °C, you can read to the nearest 0.5 °C
So for a reading that falls in between 68 and 69 °C, you could record 68.5 °C, but it would not be reasonable to record 68.3 °C
How to take readings with a ruler, and from a liquid:
Always take ruler measurements in mm, e.g. 42 mm, rather than in cm, when measuring for magnification calculations
When reading liquid volumes, read the bottom of the meniscus at eye level to avoid parallax error

How to record readings from digital instruments:
Write down every digit shown on the display
For example, do not write 5.0 g as 5 g
The trailing zero (.0) shows the resolution of the balance
How to record values in a results table:
All readings from the same instrument down a column must have the same number of decimal places
Put units in the header, never in the body of the table
If a digital stopwatch shows minutes and seconds, convert values to match the units in the header before entering them into a table
Or create an extra column to do the calculation
Examiner Tips and Tricks
Look at the smallest division on the scale before you take a reading. This tells you how many decimal places every reading from that instrument should have.
Repeats, sample size & random sampling
Repeating an experiment
Repeating an experiment lets you spot anomalous results and calculate a mean
Carrying out at least three trials in total for each value of the independent variable allows anomalous results to be spotted
These anomalies can then be excluded from the mean
The more repeats are carried out, the less impact each individual result has on the mean
Repeating the experiment and calculating a mean makes the results more reliable
Repeats improve reliability, not accuracy
Sampling
Testing a large sample size
For example, 100 leaves or 50 seeds, increases the likelihood that your data is representative of the whole population
Choose samples at random, so that you do not pick unusual ones without meaning to
Describe how the samples will be chosen at random, e.g. use random numbers to give coordinates on a grid
Examiner reports show that students lose marks by:
saying that repeating an experiment makes it more accurate when it makes the results more reliable
suggesting repeats with different values of the independent variable, which does not improve reliability
Examiner Tips and Tricks
Avoid saying that repeats make results more accurate. Repeating an experiment improves its reliability; to improve accuracy, you need a better method or measurement, e.g. timing in smaller intervals.
When a question asks why a step in a method is done, give the specific reason, e.g. blotting potato cylinders dry so that surface water does not add to their mass, not just "to make the results reliable".
Making a prediction
A prediction says what you expect to happen before you do the experiment
A good prediction gives a reason, using the biology you know
For example, as temperature increases up to 40 °C, the rate of enzyme activity will increase, because molecules will have more kinetic energy
A prediction is not a conclusion: a conclusion describes what your results show after the end of an experiment
The results show that as temperature increased from 20 °C to 40 °C, the rate of enzyme activity increased from 1.2 to 4.8 cm³/min, because higher kinetic energy increased the rate of successful collisions
Examiner Tips and Tricks
Be careful not to confuse predictions and conclusions; if a question asks for a conclusion, you should refer to an existing set of results, not write about what you expect to happen.
Unlock more, it's free!
Was this revision note helpful?