How to Annotate an Extract (AQA GCSE English Literature): Revision Note

Exam code: 8702

Lottie Bates

Written by: Lottie Bates

Reviewed by: Nick Redgrove

Updated on

In your English Literature exam, you will be given extracts and poems to write about. Annotating them helps you find your best evidence quickly and turn it into a plan before you start writing.

This page shows you how to annotate an extract step by step, what to look for and how to annotate a poem for a comparison question, with worked examples from Macbeth and William Blake’s ‘London’.

What does it mean to annotate an extract?

Annotating means picking out the most useful parts of a text and writing short notes beside them. In the exam, your annotations are the first stage of your plan: they show you which evidence you will use and what you will say about it.

Your English Literature exams are closed-book, so the printed extract or poem is the only text in front of you. Annotating it carefully gives you evidence that is ready to use. Examiners notice the difference: where there is evidence of planning, “there is frequently a well-constructed answer that follows”.

How to annotate an extract in your exam

Here is how to annotate an extract in five steps:

  • Read the question first: underline its key words, so you know what you are looking for

  • Read the extract once without writing on it: pay special attention to the short introduction above it, and work out what is happening at this point in the text

  • Underline the details that link to the question: choose four to six short quotations, often a single word or phrase

  • Note what each detail shows: write a few words in the margin about how it links to the question and why the writer chose it

  • Link to the rest of the text: note where else in the text the same idea appears, if the question asks about the whole text

Here’s how you might annotate part of a Macbeth extract. The key words in the question and the introduction to the extract are underlined, as well as the textual details selected. The details are numbered, and the table below the extract shows the margin note for each one.

Question: Starting with this speech, explore how far Shakespeare presents Macbeth as an ambitious character.

At this point in the play, Macbeth is alone. He is thinking about the plan to murder King Duncan.

He’s here in double trust: [1]
First, as I am his kinsman and his subject,
Strong both against the deed; then, as his host,
Who should against his murderer shut the door,
Not bear the knife myself. Besides, this Duncan
Hath borne his faculties so meek, hath been
So clear in his great office, that his virtues
Will plead like angels, trumpet-tongued against [2]
The deep damnation of his taking-off,
And pity, like a naked new-born babe, [3]
Striding the blast, or heaven’s cherubin, horsed
Upon the sightless couriers of the air,
Shall blow the horrid deed in every eye
That tears shall drown the wind. I have no spur
To prick the sides of my intent, but only [4]
Vaulting ambition which o’erleaps itself [5] ★
And falls on th’other.

Detail

Margin note

1. “double trust”

Two reasons not to kill Duncan: he is Duncan’s relative and his host. Loyalty holds back his ambition

2. “his virtues / Will plead like angels”

Duncan is a good king. The angel imagery shows Macbeth knows murder is a sin

3. “naked new-born babe”

A baby seems weak, but here pity is powerful. His conscience is fighting his ambition

4. “I have no spur / To prick the sides of my intent”

A spur makes a horse go faster. Nothing is pushing Macbeth to act → Lady Macbeth pushes him instead (“screw your courage”, same scene)

5. “Vaulting ambition which o’erleaps itself”

★ Ambition is his only reason to act, but it jumps too high and falls. This foreshadows his downfall → he ends up hopeless (“Tomorrow, and tomorrow”, Act 5)

Notes 1 to 3 show what holds Macbeth back, and notes 4 and 5 show that ambition alone is not enough to make him act. Note 5 is starred because it answers “how far” most directly.

How do you turn your annotations into a plan?

Your annotations are already most of your plan. When you have finished annotating:

  • Star your best idea: the detail that answers the question most directly becomes the core of your thesis statement (your overall answer to the question)

  • Group your notes into three or four main ideas

  • Number the ideas in the order you will write about them

Here is the plan these Macbeth annotations give you:

Thesis: Macbeth is clearly ambitious, but ambition alone is not enough to make him act.
1. His doubts: loyalty, Duncan’s goodness and pity hold him back (notes 1 to 3)
2. Ambition needs a “spur”: Lady Macbeth’s pressure later in the scene (note 4)
3. Ambition “o’erleaps itself”: it leads to his downfall in Act 5 (note 5)

How long should you spend annotating?

Annotate during your planning time, not as a separate task. A few minutes is usually enough for one extract or poem. Stop once you have enough evidence for your plan: annotation is only useful if it saves you time when you write. The table at the end of this page shows how this fits each question.

Examiner Tips and Tricks

Before you underline anything in the extract, write the focus of the question in two or three words at the top of the extract. Then, each time you underline a detail, ask yourself: does this help me answer the question? If not, leave it.

For example, jotting down “ambition: how far?” at the top of the Macbeth extract reminds you that a “how far” question needs both sides. That is why the annotations above include his doubts as well as his ambition. Annotating with the question in mind gives you a balanced argument before you begin writing, and stops you wasting time on details you will never use.

What should you look for when you annotate?

Look for details that help you answer the question, such as:

  • Words and images linked to the focus: for example, anything about ambition, power or kindness, depending on the question

  • Changes and turning points: words such as “But” or “Besides” often signal a change of thought or mood

  • Contrasts: between characters, between ideas, or between how the extract begins and ends

  • The ending: the last lines of an extract or poem often show the writer’s message most clearly

  • Links to the rest of the text: what happens before or after this moment

What should you avoid?

  • Technique labels on their own: examiners point out that a technical term “may identify a literary device, but on its own it says nothing of its impact and effect”

  • Highlighting everything: if you underline or highlight most of the extract, nothing stands out when you plan

  • Writing full sentences in the margins: keep your notes to a few words. A note only needs to remind you of your idea, because you will explain it fully in your essay, and writing sentences uses up planning time

How to annotate a poem for a comparison question

Annotating a poem uses the same five steps as an extract. Poems pack a lot of meaning into a few words, so read slowly and look for who is speaking, repeated words, a shift in tone and the last line. In a comparison question, it’s a great idea to annotate with your second poem in mind. There are two kinds of comparison question, and you annotate them differently.

How do you annotate for the anthology comparison?

In the anthology question, only one poem is printed. You choose the second poem and write about it from memory. Annotate the printed poem for the question, then:

  • Jot down your second poem: write two or three short quotations from it in the margin, from memory

  • Link the two poems: use an arrow to show where the two poems are similar or different, and add a word or two to say how

The table below shows annotations of Blake’s ‘London’ for a comparison question, with ‘Ozymandias’ as the second poem. The third column shows the link each note makes to ‘Ozymandias’.

Question: Compare how poets present ideas about power and control in ‘London’ and in one other poem from ‘Power and conflict’.

Jotted in the margin from ‘Ozymandias’: “sneer of cold command”, “Look on my works, ye Mighty, and despair!”, “lone and level sands”

Detail

Margin note

Link to ‘Ozymandias’

“chartered street” / “chartered Thames”

“Chartered” means owned and controlled. Repeating it shows even the river is owned, so power controls everything

→ Different: Ozymandias boasts of his power (“Look on my works”), but it has gone

“mind-forged manacles”

★ People’s own minds trap them too: they accept being controlled

→ Different: Ozymandias controls people openly, through fear (“sneer of cold command”)

“Runs in blood down palace walls”

Soldiers suffer and die, and Blake blames the rulers in the palace

→ Similar: both poets attack cruel, powerful rulers

“marriage hearse”

Ends with opposites: marriage (new life) and a hearse (death). Even love is spoiled

→ Different ending: Ozymandias’ power fades with time (“lone and level sands”)

The starred note gives a thesis about power and control, and the links give you the comparison: both poems show cruel power, but in ‘London’ it controls everything, while in ‘Ozymandias’ it does not last.

How do you annotate for the unseen comparison?

In the unseen comparison, both poems are printed and you won’t have studied either of them. Annotate them in this order:

  • Read the questions first: they tell you what the poems are about

  • Read the first poem without writing on it: work out who is speaking and what the situation is

  • Read it again and underline: pick out the details that answer the question

  • Annotate the second poem for methods only: underline the methods you can compare with the first poem, and note which part of the first poem each one links to

Annotating in your AQA English Literature exam

In your AQA English Literature exams, you cannot take your set texts in with you. You can only annotate what is printed on the question paper, and that is different for each question.

This table shows how to approach each part of your two exam papers:

Paper

Question

What you are given

How to annotate

Paper 1

Shakespeare

An extract from the play

Annotate as part of about 10 minutes’ planning. Note links to the whole play: you must write about both

Paper 1

19th-century novel

An extract from the novel

Annotate as part of about 10 minutes’ planning. Note links to the whole novel: you must write about both

Paper 2

Modern text

No extract

Underline the key words of the question, then plan from memory

Paper 2

Poetry anthology

One named poem. Your second poem is not printed

Annotate the printed poem, then jot down quotations from your second poem in the margin. You must write about both poems

Paper 2

Unseen poetry

Two poems you have not seen before

First question (one poem, 24 marks): annotate the poem for the focus of the question. Comparison question (8 marks): underline only the methods you will compare

Examiner Tips and Tricks

In the unseen poetry section, read both questions before the poems. Examiners explain that the questions “have been written to give you a clear steer” about what the first poem is about and how the two poems connect. Annotate the first poem with that focus in mind.

The first question is worth 24 marks and the comparison 8, so spend most of your annotating time on the first poem. Examiners have noticed some students spending more time on the comparison than its marks are worth. For the second poem, two or three methods that are similar or different are enough.

Sources

Stanley Wells and Gary Taylor (eds), 2005, The Oxford Shakespeare: The Complete Works (Second Edition), Oxford University Press

AQA. (2015). Past and Present: Poetry Anthology. GCSE English Literature (8702). AQA.

AQA. GCSE English Literature (8702) Specification. AQA.

AQA. GCSE English Literature (8702) Paper 1 Question Paper, June 2025, and Paper 1P Question Paper, November 2021. AQA.

AQA. GCSE English Literature (8702) Paper 1 Mark Scheme, June 2025. AQA.

AQA. GCSE English Literature (8702) Paper 1N Report on the Examination, June 2022. AQA.

AQA. GCSE English Literature (8702) Paper 2 Reports on the Examination, June 2023 and June 2024. AQA.

Unlock more, it's free!

Join the 100,000+ Students that ❤️ Save My Exams

the (exam) results speak for themselves:

Lottie Bates

Author: Lottie Bates

Expertise: Curriculum Expert

Lottie has worked in education as a teacher of History and Classical subjects, supporting students across GCSE, IGCSE and A Level. This has given her a strong understanding of how to help students succeed in exams, particularly when structuring written answers and using specific evidence effectively. She believes that studying history helps students make sense of the modern world, and is passionate about making complex topics clear, accessible and relevant to exam success.

Nick Redgrove

Reviewer: Nick Redgrove

Expertise: Curriculum Expert

Nick is a graduate of the University of Cambridge and King’s College London. He started his career in journalism and publishing, working as an editor on a political magazine and a number of books, before training as an English teacher. After nearly 10 years working in London schools, where he held leadership positions in English departments and within a Sixth Form, he moved on to become an examiner and education consultant. With more than a decade of experience as a tutor, Nick specialises in English, but has also taught Politics, Classical Civilisation and Religious Studies.