The Sign of the Four: Characters (AQA GCSE English Literature): Revision Note
Exam code: 8702
Characters
It is vital that you understand that characters are often used symbolically to express ideas. Conan Doyle uses all of his characters to symbolise various ideas prevalent in his society, and the differences between characters reflect contemporary debates. Therefore, it is very useful not only to learn about each character individually, but how they compare and contrast to other characters in the novel.
It is important to consider the range of strategies used by Conan Doyle to create and develop characters within The Sign of the Four. This includes:
how characters are established
how characters are presented:
physical appearance or suggestions about this
actions and motives for them
what they say and think
how they interact with others
what others say and think about them
how far the characters conform to or subvert stereotypes
their relationships between other characters
Below you will find character profiles of:
Sherlock Holmes
Dr John Watson
Mary Morstan
Thaddeus Sholto
Jonathan Small
Athelney Jones
Examiner Tips and Tricks
Examiners reward answers that read characters as contrasts the writer has arranged. Holmes and Watson are written to be compared.
For example, you could write: “Conan Doyle has Watson fall in love while Holmes returns to his drugs, so the two men end the case in opposite states”. Explaining why two characters end a story in opposite states is stronger than describing each of them.
Sherlock Holmes

Sherlock is the protagonist of the novel and Conan Doyle depicts him as a character with a brilliant mind and exceptional intellectual abilities:
He possesses remarkable observational abilities and has a capacity to make exacting judgments
He is presented as both analytical and assertive:
His dedication to rationality is evident in his reliance on facts and evidence rather than speculation or intuition
Additionally, Holmes' extensive understanding and aptitude for adopting different identities makes him a complex and captivating character
Holmes is an intricate personality who possesses distinctive peculiarities and eccentricities:
His peculiar nature means he could be viewed as appearing somewhat superior or arrogant
He often adopts a detached and analytical approach to his profession and is relatively devoid of emotion:
Hence, he is generally presented as being indifferent and aloof
However, his detached demeanour is also contrasted by occasional displays of empathy and concern for others, which reveal his more humane side
Holmes’ loyalty to Watson is a consistent theme throughout the narrative
He frequently acknowledges Watson’s contributions and demonstrates his appreciation of their friendship
Conan Doyle portrays Holmes as someone who is capable of reassessing his position:
He is not always correct in his assumptions which makes him more relatable as a character
His dedication to his profession is evident as he immerses himself in the pursuit of truth, often at the expense of his own well-being
Holmes' dependence on substances like tobacco and cocaine are his vices:
This facet of his personality adds an intricacy and fragility, which reveals a hidden depth beneath his outward brilliance
Therefore, to some extent, Holmes could be viewed as a vulnerable, even sympathetic, character
Dr John Watson

Watson is first presented as “an army surgeon with a weak leg and a weaker banking account”
He is Holmes’ dependable and faithful companion and his unwavering loyalty to him is evident throughout the novel:
This is highlighted by his willingness to put himself in danger and his belief in Holmes’ abilities
This loyalty adds depth to their partnership and highlights one of the novel’s major themes of friendship
Watson serves as the narrator of the novel, providing the reader with a relatable perspective through which the narrative unfolds
He is characterised as an honest and rational observer, offering a balanced perspective to the narrative
Although Watson doesn't possess the remarkable deductive abilities of Holmes, his contribution to the cases illustrates his own cleverness and ingenuity
He is portrayed as a competent and capable individual and he provides insightful observations, assisting Holmes in analysing evidence
As a trained physician, his medical expertise proves valuable in the course of the investigations
Doyle also reveals Watson's compassionate nature throughout the novel:
He demonstrates empathy towards the characters he encounters
His relatability and grounded nature make him a sympathetic character
Watson is more sentimental than Holmes, but also more biased and critical of others
He does not have an innate tendency towards optimism and takes a cautious approach to life
His romantic relationship with Mary Morstan introduces a romantic element within the narrative
Mary Morstan

Mary Morstan is first portrayed as a strong, independent woman possessing both integrity and fortitude:
Her determination to uncover the truth surrounding her father's disappearance demonstrates her strength of character and her desire for justice
Her connection to the Agra treasure serves as a catalyst for the narrative
She is depicted as an intelligent and observant individual and her astuteness highlights her intellect and perceptiveness
She forms a bond with Watson throughout the course of the novel and their growing connection is marked by moments of mutual support and understanding
Mary is depicted as compassionate and empathetic:
Her caring nature is evident in her concern for the welfare of others, for example, when she expresses sympathy for the hardships faced by Jonathan Small
She is idealised by Watson and his narration often presents Mary through a somewhat romanticised view:
Watson’s descriptions of her often focus on her physical appearance, emphasising her beauty, grace and other attributes that are traditionally associated with femininity
Watson's admiration for Mary’s beauty and grace is apparent in his descriptions:
However, it is worth noting that this perspective may be influenced by Watson's own subjective observations and personal feelings towards her
In some ways her character could be viewed as challenging traditional gender roles of the Victorian era:
She actively engages in the investigation alongside Holmes and Watson, and contributes her own insights and observations
Despite this, she is also presented as weak and delicate and in need of protection:
Conan Doyle largely portrays her in a supporting role, often fainting and turning pale
This presentation largely aligns with Victorian ideals of femininity and delicacy
Thaddeus Sholto

Thaddeus Sholto is first presented as a secretive and enigmatic figure who plays a significant role in the narrative:
This air of mystery surrounding him creates intrigue and suspense in the narrative
Thaddeus struggles with the legacy of his late father, Major Sholto, and he is burdened by the knowledge of the Agra treasure and the tragic events surrounding it
He is, therefore, a conflicted character who is torn between both guilt and loyalty:
This inner conflict adds depth to his character and raises questions about his motives and allegiances
Although Thaddeus is often portrayed as a feeble and vulnerable character, he is just and morally upright in his behaviour
He is portrayed as an individual who possesses a sense of responsibility:
He willingly cooperates with Holmes and Watson, providing them with crucial information which aids their investigation
His actions and interactions with the other characters reveal his desire to rectify the mistakes of the past and seek justice for those who have suffered
Thaddeus’ vulnerability and fear are also revealed which adds a humanising element to his character and elicits empathy from the reader
In contrast to Major Sholto’s deceit and Bartholomew’s secrecy, Thaddeus acts with integrity and openness
He embodies benevolence and treats Mary with kindness and compassion
Ultimately, Thaddeus is spared punishment and treated with sympathy
Jonathan Small

Jonathan Small is first described as ‘a bearded hairy face, with wild, cruel eyes and an expression of concentrated malevolence’:
In this way, he's described using colonial stereotypes, which reflect Victorian prejudices
His determination and survival instincts make him a formidable and cunning character
He seeks retribution against those he believes have wronged him, and this motivates his actions in the novella:
His relentless pursuit of justice adds a layer of intensity to the narrative
Conan Doyle portrays Small as a complex and morally ambiguous character:
While his desire for revenge could be viewed as justifiable, his actions and involvement in criminal activities blur the lines between right and wrong
Although his criminal actions cannot be condoned, his background and the circumstances surrounding the Agra treasure shed light on the injustices he has faced:
This nuanced portrayal challenges the reader’s perceptions of him and invokes a mix of emotions towards him
Small's loyalty is tested when confronted with the opportunity to reveal the truth and to seek justice
Small expresses regret at the treasure’s cost, though not full remorse:
This raises questions about his motivations and potential for redemption
He is shown as fiercely loyal to his comrades, particularly to Tonga
As a character, he elicits both sympathy and disdain from the reader
Athelney Jones

Athelney Jones is portrayed as a well-intentioned but somewhat bumbling and overconfident detective
He is introduced as a self-proclaimed expert in the science of detection, frequently using his extensive knowledge to explain his methods
He is depicted as being overly influenced by the latest advancements in forensic science often prioritising new techniques over traditional investigative methods
Jones is portrayed as someone who takes great pride in his investigative skills and enjoys demonstrating his expertise
His character serves as a contrast to Holmes, highlighting the unique qualities that make Holmes an exceptional detective
Jones often lacks the keen observational and deductive abilities that make Holmes so remarkable
He frequently makes mistakes and jumps to hasty conclusions, leading him down misguided paths in his investigations:
His portrayal highlights the contrast between Holmes’ meticulous and precise methods and Jones’ more impulsive and less accurate approach
Through the presentation of Jones, the police are also characterised by Conan-Doyle as ineffective and foolish
However, Jones is a character who is willing to learn and adapt from Holmes:
Despite his initial scepticism towards Holmes’ unconventional methods, he gradually comes to appreciate the detective's brilliance
He is portrayed as a good-natured and amiable character:
He retains a cordial relationship with Holmes despite their professional differences
Sources
Doyle, Arthur Conan. “The Sign of the Four.” Project Gutenberg. https://www.gutenberg.org/files/2097/2097-h/2097-h.htm.
Unlock more, it's free!
Was this revision note helpful?
Build on this topic