Writer’s Methods: Language, Form and Structure (AQA GCSE English Literature): Revision Note

Exam code: 8702

Nick Redgrove

Written by: Nick Redgrove

Reviewed by: Lottie Bates

Updated on

Writer’s methods are the choices a writer makes to create meaning, and the AQA mark scheme rewards you for analysing them in each one of your AQA GCSE English Literature essays.

This page explains the difference between language, form and structure, and shows you how to write about each one, with worked examples from Macbeth, An Inspector Calls, A Christmas Carol and the AQA poetry anthology.

What are writer’s methods?

Writer’s methods are all the choices a writer makes to shape what the reader or audience thinks and feels. You can sort them into three groups:

  • Language: the words and images the writer chooses

  • Form: the type of text the writer chooses, and the shape it comes in

  • Structure: the order and arrangement of the text

Mark schemes refer to this skill in different ways, such as “writer’s methods”, “language, form and structure” or “the writer’s effects”. However, these terms all point to the same skill you need to show the examiner: explaining how a writer creates meaning.

Why do writer’s methods matter in English Literature?

Analysing writer’s methods accounts for over 40% of the marks in AQA GCSE English Literature. Methods matter for three reasons:

  • Methods show how meaning is made, so your analysis explains how a text works

  • Methods keep the writer at the centre of your essay, which stops you retelling the plot

  • Methods are assessed in every section of your exams, so you need this skill for every text

Analysing methods means that you are aware that the writer of a text shaped that text deliberately, in order to create effects. When you explain how the writer makes something happen, you show the examiner that you can analyse the text as well as understand it, and that’s what gains the highest marks at GCSE.

What is the difference between language, form and structure?

The simplest way to differentiate between language, form and structure is to ask how much of the text the feature that you have identified covers. Language works on words and phrases. Form is the type of text and its shape. Structure is the order of the whole text, or of a section of it.

Method

Examples

A question to ask

Language

Word choice, imagery (metaphor, simile and personification), symbolism, repetition, lists

Why did the writer choose this word or image?

Form

Tragedy, novella, sonnet, dramatic monologue, verse or prose in a play, metre, stanza length

Why did the writer choose this type of text, or this shape?

Structure

Openings and endings, chapter and act breaks, foreshadowing, a turn in a poem, contrasts

Why does this happen at this point in the text?

Some methods fit more than one group. Metre is part of a poem’s form, but a sudden change in metre is also structure. Don’t worry about labelling a method perfectly, because the examiner rewards what you say about its effect.

Which language techniques do you need for GCSE?

You don’t need to memorise a long list of language devices for your exams. The language techniques GCSE students use most are word choice (you can simply call it “the word”), imagery, symbolism, repetition and contrast. A precise comment on one word earns more credit than an unusual term you can’t explain.

What counts as structure in a novel or play?

In a novel or play, structure includes how the text opens and ends, where the chapter, act and scene breaks fall, and the timing of entrances and turning points. It also includes foreshadowing and dramatic irony.

How to write about writer’s methods

Here is how to write about a writer’s methods in five steps:

  • Make the writer the subject of your sentence, for example “Dickens presents…”

  • Name the method, using a subject term only if it makes your point more precise

  • Support your point with a short quotation or a precise reference to the text

  • Explain the effect of the method on the reader or audience

  • Link the effect to the writer’s ideas or purpose

Steps 4 and 5 matter most. Naming a technique on its own is called technique spotting, and it only shows the examiner that you know a term. To avoid it, start with an idea about the text, and then choose the method that shows that idea best.

Characters and themes as constructs

Is a character a writer’s method? Yes. The writer creates each character for a purpose, such as a foil, a mouthpiece or a symbol.

For example, in An Inspector Calls, you could write: “Priestley uses the Inspector as a mouthpiece for his socialist views when the Inspector tells the Birlings, ‘We are members of one body.’”

Themes work in the same way, because the writer builds each theme through characters and events, for example: “Dickens explores poverty through the Cratchit family.”

Examiner Tips and Tricks

The most useful habit you can build is to start each paragraph with an idea, and then show the method that creates it. If you start with a technique, it’s easy to end up listing terms, and a list of terms tells the examiner very little about the text.

Before you write each paragraph, ask yourself what the writer wants the reader to think. Then choose the method that shows it best, whether that’s a single word or the shape of the whole text. For example, you could write: “Priestley wants the audience to see that the older Birlings haven’t learned their lesson, so he ends the play with a phone call announcing that a police inspector is on his way.”

What does writing about methods look like?

Language, form and structure look slightly different in drama, prose and poetry. Form and structure are harder to write about, so each worked example below focuses on one of them.

Writer’s methods in drama

  • Language: In Macbeth, Shakespeare uses hyperbole when Macbeth asks whether “all great Neptune’s ocean” could wash the blood from his hand. The image suggests his guilt is too great to wash away.

  • Form: Most noble characters in Macbeth speak in iambic pentameter. The witches speak in shorter lines with a trochaic metre, which sounds like a chant: “Double, double, toil and trouble, / Fire burn, and cauldron bubble.” The rhythm marks the witches out as unnatural.

  • Structure: Macbeth’s first line, “So foul and fair a day I have not seen”, echoes the witches’ “Fair is foul, and foul is fair”. Macbeth hasn’t met the witches yet, so the echo links him to them from the start.

Worked example (structure in An Inspector Calls): In Act 1, Mr Birling mocks “community and all that nonsense”, and Priestley interrupts him with “the sharp ring of a front door bell”. You could write:

“Priestley times the Inspector’s arrival so that the ‘sharp ring’ of the doorbell cuts off Birling’s speech about looking after himself. The interruption suggests that Birling’s selfish views are about to be challenged, and it prepares the audience for Priestley’s message about shared responsibility.”

Writer’s methods in prose

  • Language: In A Christmas Carol, Dickens describes Scrooge as a “squeezing, wrenching, grasping, scraping, clutching, covetous, old sinner!” Most of these words describe grabbing or holding on tightly, so the long list suggests Scrooge’s greed never lets go.

  • Form: A Christmas Carol is a novella and a ghost story. The narrator talks to the reader as if they are sitting together, which means the lesson is aimed at the reader as well as at Scrooge.

  • Structure: Dickens divides the novella into five “staves”, which are the verses of a song. Each stave is one step in Scrooge’s change. Calling the chapters staves reminds readers that the story is meant to spread Christmas cheer, just as a carol does.

Worked example (structure in A Christmas Carol): You could write:

“Dickens uses a cyclical structure to show how far Scrooge has changed. In Stave 1, Scrooge refuses his nephew Fred’s invitation to Christmas dinner, but in Stave 5 he arrives at Fred’s door and asks, ‘Will you let me in, Fred?’ Repeating the earlier scene with a different ending shows the reader the extent of Scrooge’s transformation.”

Writer’s methods in poetry

  • Language: In ‘London’, Blake describes “mind-forged manacles”. Manacles are chains for a prisoner’s wrists, and “mind-forged” suggests that people are trapped by ideas, possibly ideas that society has taught them.

  • Form: In ‘My Last Duchess’, Browning uses a dramatic monologue, so the Duke reveals his own jealousy and cruelty as he talks.

  • Structure: In ‘Ozymandias’, Shelley places “Nothing beside remains.” straight after the king’s boast on the pedestal, so his proud words are undercut at once.

Worked example (form in ‘My Last Duchess’): You could write:

“Browning writes ‘My Last Duchess’ as a dramatic monologue, so the Duke is the only voice the reader hears. His listener never speaks, which suggests that the Duke controls every conversation, just as he controlled his wife. He hints at her death with ‘I gave commands’, and the form means nobody in the poem can question him.”

What are the common mistakes?

  • Technique spotting: naming a method without explaining its effect only shows the examiner that you know a term, so it earns very little credit

  • Writing about characters as real people: discussing what a character should have done takes the writer out of your essay, so there’s no analysis of methods to reward

  • Only writing about language: analysing single words in every paragraph leaves out form and structure, which limits how fully you can show the writer’s methods

  • Naming the form with no effect: saying a poem is a sonnet tells the examiner nothing unless you explain how the form fits the poem’s ideas

  • Retelling the plot as “structure”: describing events in order earns no credit for analysis, so explain why the writer placed an event at that point

Writer’s methods in your AQA English Literature exam

AQA assesses writer’s methods through AO2, which asks you to “analyse the language, form and structure used by a writer to create meanings and effects, using relevant subject terminology where appropriate”.

AO2 carries 42.5% of the marks for the whole qualification, which is more than any other assessment objective. AO2 is assessed in every section of both papers, so this table shows how GCSE students should address writer’s methods in each one:

Paper

Section

Methods to focus on

Paper 1

Shakespeare

Language and form in the extract, contrasts in language and form between the extract and the rest of the play, then structure across the whole play

Paper 1

19th-century novel

Language in the extract, then language and structure across the whole novel

Paper 2

Modern text

Structure and characters as constructs, which you can write about without the text, plus short learned quotations

Paper 2

Poetry anthology

Language, form and structure in both poems, compared

Paper 2

Unseen poetry

Question 27.1: methods in one poem. Question 27.2: a comparison of methods in both poems

Examiner Tips and Tricks

Question 27.2 on Paper 2 is worth 8 marks, and it only assesses AO2. That means every mark comes from analysis of methods, so you don’t need to spend time on context or on a long summary of what each poem is about.

Choose two or three methods and compare how each poet uses them, such as the speaker’s voice, the imagery or the length of the lines. Keep the comparison in the same sentence wherever you can. For example, you could write: “Both poets describe a parent, but the first poet uses long, flowing sentences that suggest calm, while the second uses short lines that make the speaker sound anxious.”

Sources

Stanley Wells and Gary Taylor (eds), 2005, The Oxford Shakespeare: The Complete Works (Second Edition), Oxford University Press

Priestley, J.B. (1992). An Inspector Calls. Heinemann.

Dickens, Charles. A Christmas Carol. Project Gutenberg eBook #46. https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/46

AQA. (2015). Past and Present: Poetry Anthology. GCSE English Literature (8702). AQA.

AQA. GCSE English Literature (8702) Specification. AQA.

Unlock more, it's free!

Join the 100,000+ Students that ❤️ Save My Exams

the (exam) results speak for themselves:

Nick Redgrove

Author: Nick Redgrove

Expertise: Curriculum Expert

Nick is a graduate of the University of Cambridge and King’s College London. He started his career in journalism and publishing, working as an editor on a political magazine and a number of books, before training as an English teacher. After nearly 10 years working in London schools, where he held leadership positions in English departments and within a Sixth Form, he moved on to become an examiner and education consultant. With more than a decade of experience as a tutor, Nick specialises in English, but has also taught Politics, Classical Civilisation and Religious Studies.

Lottie Bates

Reviewer: Lottie Bates

Expertise: Curriculum Expert

Lottie has worked in education as a teacher of History and Classical subjects, supporting students across GCSE, IGCSE and A Level. This has given her a strong understanding of how to help students succeed in exams, particularly when structuring written answers and using specific evidence effectively. She believes that studying history helps students make sense of the modern world, and is passionate about making complex topics clear, accessible and relevant to exam success.