The Genetic Basis of Behavior & Evolution (College Board AP® Psychology): Study Guide
The genetic basis of behavior
The biological basis of behavior refers to the idea that behavior and mental processes are shaped, at least in part, by heredity
Heredity refers to the predisposed genetic characteristics passed down from one generation to the next
These genes influence physical, behavioral, and mental traits and processes, e.g., having a genetic predisposition toward anxiety or depression
Genes are the basic biological units responsible for carrying information about traits between successive generations
Many physical and psychological characteristics are at least partially inherited
The term heritability refers to the degree of variance among individuals for a specific trait that can be attributed to genetic differences
It does not mean a trait is entirely determined by genes, but rather that genes account for some of the differences observed between people
Importantly, no single gene is thought to be responsible for complex psychological traits or disorders
It is more likely that different combinations of genes make individuals more or less vulnerable to particular behaviors or conditions
Psychologists investigate the genetic basis of behavior using three main non-experimental research methods:
Twin studies
Family studies
Adoption studies
Twin studies
Twin studies compare monozygotic (MZ) twins with dizygotic (DZ) twins
MZ twins are identical twins who develop from a single fertilized egg and share 100% of their DNA
DZ twins are fraternal twins who develop from two separate eggs and share approximately 50% of their DNA
DZ twins are no more genetically similar than any other sibling pair
Because MZ twins share all of their genetic material, any greater similarity between MZ twins compared to DZ twins on a specific trait is taken as evidence of a genetic influence on that trait
If a trait were entirely determined by genetics, 100% of MZ twin pairs would share it
This is rarely found - twin studies consistently demonstrate that both heredity and environment contribute to behavior and mental processes
Research support
Joseph (2004) analyzed data from all schizophrenia twin studies conducted prior to 2001
MZ twins showed a much higher rate of similarity (40.4%) than DZ twins (7.4%)
This suggests a substantial genetic contribution to the disorder
This finding also demonstrates that environment plays a role since MZ twin pairs did not show 100% agreement
Bouchard et al. (1990) conducted a large-scale twin study examining heritability of IQ
MZ twins reared together showed a correlation of +0.86, suggesting a strong genetic contribution to intelligence
The finding shows that environment also plays as role in intelligence as the correlation is not a perfect +1.0
Limitations
Twin studies are non-experimental
Researchers cannot randomly assign participants to be MZ or DZ twins, meaning causation cannot be established
MZ twins tend to be treated more similarly by parents, teachers, and peers than DZ twins
E.g. they may dress alike, share the same friend groups and join the same extracurricular activities
This means that their greater environmental similarity, not just their greater genetic similarity, may partly account for their higher rates of agreement on traits and behaviors
Family studies
Family studies examine whether specific traits or psychological disorders cluster within biological families, on the basis that family members share a proportion of their genetic material
Researchers compare rates of a trait in first-degree relatives (parents, siblings, children) versus more distant relatives or the general population
First-degree relatives share approximately 50% of DNA
If a trait has a genetic basis, first-degree relatives of an affected individual should show higher rates of that trait than the general population
Rates should decrease as genetic relatedness decreases
Research support
Gottesman (1991) compiled family study data on schizophrenia, illustrating clearly how risk increases with genetic relatedness:
The general population has a 1% risk
First cousins have approximately a 2% risk
Siblings approximately a 9% risk
Children with one affected parent approximately a 13% risk
Children with two affected parents approximately a 46% risk
This graduated pattern of risk, tracking closely with degree of genetic relatedness, provides compelling evidence for a hereditary contribution to behavior and mental processes
Limitations
Family members also share environments
E.g. homes, schools, economic circumstances, and communication patterns, which makes it difficult to separate genetic from environmental influences
Therefore, family studies alone cannot establish that a trait is inherited rather than environmentally transmitted
The sample of families studied may not be representative of the wider population
Families who come to the attention of researchers are often those already known to clinical or medical services, meaning they may represent more severe cases
This could mean findings cannot be generalized to the wider population
Adoption studies
Adoption studies examine individuals who have been raised by non-biological parents
Adoption studies allow researchers to separate the effects of heredity from environment more clearly than twin or family studies alone
If an adopted individual shows greater similarity to their biological family than their adoptive family on a specific trait, this is taken as evidence for a genetic influence on that trait
If an adopted individual shows greater similarity to their adoptive family, this points to the importance of environmental factors
Research support
Tienari et al. (2000) studied 164 adoptees whose biological mothers had been diagnosed with schizophrenia
6.7% of these adoptees also received a diagnosis of schizophrenia, compared to only 2% of 197 control adoptees born to mothers without schizophrenia
This suggests a genetic contribution to the disorder that persisted even when children were raised in different environments
Limitations
Adoption studies assume that the adoptive families of children with a biological family history of a disorder are no different from other adoptive families
In practice, potential adoptive parents are often informed of a child's biological background before adopting
This means that families who choose to adopt such children may not be representative, e.g. they may have personal experience of the disorder themselves
This is a potential confounding variable that complicates interpretation of findings
Adoption studies are non-experimental
Researchers cannot randomly assign children to biological or adoptive families
Additionally, adopted children may be selectively placed in environments similar to their biological family's background
This means that similarities between adopted children and their biological families may partly reflect environmental similarity rather than genetic inheritance
The evolutionary perspective
The evolutionary perspective explores how natural selection affects the expression of behavior and mental processes, in order to increase survival and reproductive success
Natural selection can be defined as:
The process by which traits that improve an organism's chances of survival and reproduction are passed on to future generations, while traits that reduce survival and reproduction gradually disappear from the population
Behaviors that are adaptive are more likely to be inherited and maintained across generations
This is why certain behavioral tendencies appear to be widespread across human populations
Behaviours that evolutionary psychologists argue have been shaped by natural selection include:
Aggression
Aggression may have conferred survival advantages in competition for resources and protection against threats from predators and rival groups
Memory
The ability to recall the location of food sources or environmental dangers would have been critical for survival in ancestral environments
Language
Language enables communication, cooperation, and coordination within social groups, enhancing collective survival
Mate selection
Tendencies to select mates based on indicators of health and genetic fitness may have increased the likelihood of producing healthy offspring, thereby increasing reproductive success
The evolutionary perspective proposes that to fully understand a behavior, we should ask not just how it works, but why it exists
This is known as asking about the ultimate cause of a behavior
Eugenics
Eugenics is a discredited branch of thinking that misapplied principles of the evolutionary perspective to argue that some human groups were genetically superior to others
This was used to justify discriminatory policies including:
forced sterilization of people deemed "unfit" to reproduce, including those with mental illness, disabilities, or from certain ethnic groups
racial segregation and anti-immigration laws in the United States in the early 20th century, based on claims of genetic inferiority
the Nazi regime's genocide programs in the 1930s–40s, which used eugenic ideology to justify the systematic murder of millions of people
Eugenics is scientifically unfounded — there is no evidence that any human group is genetically superior to another
It serves as a stark example of how evolutionary ideas can be misapplied in ways that discriminate against and cause devastating harm to others
Examiner Tips and Tricks
The AP exam may ask you to identify whether a study uses experimental or non-experimental methodology. Twin studies, family studies, and adoption studies are all non-experimental as:
there is no manipulation of an independent variable
there is no random assignment
Make sure you can justify this using a specific feature of the study, rather than just naming it.
When applying the evolutionary perspective in a scenario, don't just say a behavior "helps survival" — be specific about how it would have increased survival or reproductive success for our ancestors.
Unlock more, it's free!
Was this revision note helpful?