Correlations (College Board AP® Psychology): Study Guide
What is correlational research?
Correlational research is a non-experimental methodology — there is no manipulation of variables and no IV
Instead, two co-variables are measured and compared to identify whether a relationship exists between them
Because there is no manipulation of an IV, correlational research cannot establish cause and effect
Co-variables
In correlational research, the variables being studied are called co-variables
One or both co-variables may be pre-existing data, e.g.
average number of hours of sleep per night and GPA scores
daily temperature and number of violent crimes reported in a city
One or both co-variables may be measured as part of the research itself, e.g.
number of hours spent on social media per day and self-reported levels of anxiety
number of hours of exercise per week and self-reported stress levels
Each participant produces two scores (one for each co-variable) which are then used to calculate whether a relationship exists
Types of correlation
Correlational data is typically displayed on a scatterplot, where each point represents one participant's two scores
There are three possible outcomes:
Positive correlation:
One co-variable increases as the other co-variable increases (but not necessarily at the same rate)
E.g., as the number of hours spent studying increases, GPA scores also increase
On a scatterplot, the data points trend upward from left to right
Negative correlation:
One co-variable increases as the other co-variable decreases (but not necessarily at the same rate)
E.g. as the number of hours spent on social media increases, self-reported sleep quality decreases
On a scatterplot, the data points trend downward from left to right
Zero correlation:
There is no relationship between the two co-variables
E.g. shoe size and IQ score
On a scatterplot, the data points are scattered with no clear pattern

The correlation coefficient
The strength and direction of a correlation can be calculated as a correlation coefficient — a numerical value expressed between -1 and +1:
A perfect positive correlation = +1
A perfect negative correlation = -1
No relationship = 0
The closer the value is to +1 or -1, the stronger the relationship between the co-variables
Both positive and negative correlations can be described as weak, moderate, or strong:
A coefficient of +0.8 indicates a strong positive correlation
A coefficient of -0.4 indicates a moderate negative correlation
A coefficient of +0.1 indicates a weak positive correlation
Evaluation of types of correlation
The data may be readily available for researchers to quickly analyze large amounts of information that would otherwise be impossible to collect from scratch
This increases the reliability of the findings
Correlational research allows researchers to identify relationships between variables and make predictions, which can inform real-world interventions
E.g., identifying a relationship between sleep deprivation and academic performance could be used to develop interventions supporting at-risk students
Correlational research can be used to establish whether a relationship exists before designing a more controlled experiment to test causation
Limitations
Correlational research cannot establish cause and effect
The directionality problem and the third variable problem mean that alternative explanations for any relationship can always be proposed
Extraneous factors connected to one or both co-variables may affect the results and lead to invalid conclusions
E.g. a correlation between school absence and low GPA may reflect underlying illness rather than a direct relationship between attendance and achievement
Correlational research is most effective for linear relationships e.g. height and shoe size
It is less useful when the relationship between co-variables is non-linear, which limits the types of conclusions that can be drawn
Examiner Tips and Tricks
A strong correlation does not mean one variable causes the other — no matter how high the correlation coefficient, causation cannot be inferred from correlational data alone
A zero correlation does not mean the two variables are unrelated — it means there is no linear relationship; a non-linear relationship may still exist
Correlational research is not the same as an experiment — the absence of IV manipulation means it is always classified as non-experimental methodology
Correlation vs experiment
It is important to distinguish correlational research from experimental research:
Experiment | Correlational research | |
|---|---|---|
Variables | IV is manipulated by the researcher | No manipulation — two co-variables are measured |
What is measured | The difference between conditions | The strength and direction of a relationship |
Cause and effect | Can be established with controls | Cannot be established |
Design | Experimental methodology | Non-experimental methodology |
Even when a strong correlation is found between two co-variables, causation cannot be assumed. There are two key reasons for this:
The directionality problem
The third variable problem
The directionality problem
When a correlation is found, it is not possible to determine which co-variable influenced the other
Either co-variable could be influencing the other, or the relationship could be bidirectional
E.g. a positive correlation between social media use and anxiety could mean:
social media use causes anxiety, or
anxiety causes increased social media use, or
both variables are influencing each other simultaneously
The third variable problem
A correlation between two co-variables may be caused by a third, unmeasured variable that influences both
E.g. a positive correlation between ice cream sales and violent crime rates is not because ice cream causes violence — a third variable (hot weather) increases both independently
The third variable is a confounding variable — it offers an alternative explanation for the relationship and means a causal conclusion cannot be drawn
Examiner Tips and Tricks
When evaluating a correlational study in the exam, always address both the directionality problem and the third variable problem when explaining why correlation does not equal causation — naming one alone is not sufficient.
For each problem, illustrate your answer using the specific co-variables from the research scenario you have been given.
Unlock more, it's free!
Was this revision note helpful?