The Levels of Processing Model of Memory (College Board AP® Psychology): Study Guide

Raj Bonsor

Written by: Raj Bonsor

Reviewed by: Claire Neeson

Updated on

Levels of processing model

  • The levels of processing model, proposed by Craik & Lockhart (1972), offers an alternative way of thinking about memory to the multi-store model

  • Rather than focusing on separate memory stores, this model proposes that

    • how well something is remembered depends on how deeply it is processed at the point of encoding

    • the deeper the level of processing, the stronger and more durable the memory trace, and therefore the better the later recall

  • There are three levels of processing, from shallowest to deepest:

Level

Type of processing

Description

Example

Structural

Shallow

Processing based on the physical appearance of the information - its visual form

Noticing that the word "MEMORY" is written in capital letters

Phonemic

Intermediate

Processing based on the sound of the information. How it is pronounced or what it rhymes with

Noticing that the word "memory" rhymes with "emery"

Semantic

Deep

Processing based on the meaning of the information. Connecting information to existing knowledge and understanding

Thinking about what memory means and how it relates to your own experiences of remembering

  • Information processed at the semantic level produces the strongest, most durable memory traces because meaning creates rich connections to existing knowledge in LTM

  • Information processed only at the structural level produces weak, shallow memory traces that fade quickly

Elaborative rehearsal and levels of processing

  • The levels of processing model provides the theoretical basis for why elaborative rehearsal is more effective than maintenance rehearsal:

    • Maintenance rehearsal involves shallow, repetitive processing

      • Repeating information without thinking about its meaning (structural or phonemic level)

    • Elaborative rehearsal involves deep, meaningful processing

      • Connecting information to existing knowledge (semantic level)

  • For example:

    • Simply repeating the term "long-term potentiation" over and over is maintenance rehearsal at the phonemic level.

    • Thinking about how it relates to synaptic strengthening and why practice improves memory is elaborative rehearsal at the semantic level

      • This produces far better long-term retention

  • Effortful processing is generally required for deep, semantic encoding, whereas automatic processing tends to produce shallower memory traces

    • This is why information encoded without conscious attention is harder to retrieve later

The self-reference effect

  • One of the most powerful forms of deep processing is the self-reference effect

    • This is the finding that information is better remembered when it is related to oneself

  • When we ask "does this apply to me?", we process information at a deep semantic level and connect it to a rich network of personal memories and experiences

    • E.g. you are more likely to remember the personality trait "generous" if you think about whether it describes you than if you simply read it as a definition

  • The self-reference effect demonstrates that the deepest level of processing involves personal meaning

    • Connecting new information to our sense of self produces the most durable memory traces of all

Levels of processing and the multi-store model compared

Multi-store model

Levels of processing model

Focus

Structure: separate stores information passes through

Process: how deeply information is encoded

Key mechanism

Rehearsal transfers information between stores

Depth of processing determines memory strength

View of STM

A distinct, limited-capacity store

No separate stores, but shallow processing produces weak traces

Practical implication

Rehearse information to move it to LTM

Process information meaningfully to improve retention

Examiner Tips and Tricks

  • For Skill 1.A, levels of processing questions may describe a study behavior and ask you to identify the level of processing being used

    • Is the person focusing on appearance, sound , or meaning?

    • Always link depth of processing to predicted recall, i.e. deeper processing predicts better retention

  • The three levels are named specifically in the CED

    • Ensure that you know all three and be able to give an example of each (Skill 1.A)

  • For Skill 2.A, levels of processing research typically uses experimental methodology, as researchers manipulate the type of processing task (IV) and measure recall accuracy (DV)

    • Be prepared to identify the research design and explain why random assignment is important for controlling individual differences in memory ability

Unlock more, it's free!

Join the 100,000+ Students that ❤️ Save My Exams

the (exam) results speak for themselves:

Raj Bonsor

Author: Raj Bonsor

Expertise: Psychology & Sociology Content Creator

Raj joined Save My Exams in 2024 as a Senior Content Creator for Psychology & Sociology. Prior to this, she spent fifteen years in the classroom, teaching hundreds of GCSE and A Level students. She has experience as Subject Leader for Psychology and Sociology, and her favourite topics to teach are research methods (especially inferential statistics!) and attachment. She has also successfully taught a number of Level 3 subjects, including criminology, health & social care, and citizenship.

Claire Neeson

Reviewer: Claire Neeson

Expertise: Psychology Content Creator

Claire has been teaching for 34 years, in the UK and overseas. She has taught GCSE, A-level and IB Psychology which has been a lot of fun and extremely exhausting! Claire is now a freelance Psychology teacher and content creator, producing textbooks, revision notes and (hopefully) exciting and interactive teaching materials for use in the classroom and for exam prep. Her passion (apart from Psychology of course) is roller skating and when she is not working (or watching 'Coronation Street') she can be found busting some impressive moves on her local roller rink.