Theories of Psychological Disorders (College Board AP® Psychology): Study Guide

Raj Bonsor

Written by: Raj Bonsor

Reviewed by: Claire Neeson

Updated on

Different perspectives on the causes of psychological disorders

The eclectic approach

  • Most psychologists employ an eclectic approach, drawing on more than one psychological perspective when diagnosing and treating clients

    • This reflects the complexity of psychological disorders, as no single perspective fully explains their causes

  • Clinicians select explanations and treatments based on the client's presentation, history, and needs, often combining approaches

    • E.g. a client's depression may be explained by biological (neurotransmitters), cognitive (negative thinking), and sociocultural (isolation) factors, and treated with both medication and therapy

  • The perspectives below represent different lenses through which the causes of psychological disorders can be examined

    • Each highlight different contributing factors

The 7 perspectives on causes of disorder

Behavioral perspective

  • Psychological disorders result from maladaptive learned associations to stimuli

  • Disorders are learned through the same mechanisms as normal behavior:

    • classical conditioning, operant conditioning, and observational learning

      • E.g. a phobia develops when a neutral stimulus is conditioned to produce a fear response

  • Treatment implication: behavior therapy seeks to unlearn maladaptive associations and replace them with adaptive ones

Psychodynamic perspective

  • Psychological disorders result from unconscious conflicts often developed during childhood:

    • Unresolved conflicts from early childhood are repressed into the unconscious and continue to drive behavior

    • Defense mechanisms use to manage these conflicts may contribute to dysfunction

      • E.g. depression may reflect repressed anger turned inward

  • Treatment implication: psychodynamic therapy seeks to bring unconscious conflicts into awareness so they can be consciously processed and resolved

Humanistic perspective

  • Psychological disorders result from being unable to fulfill one's potential due to:

    • lack of unconditional positive regard due to conditions of worth being placed upon them

    • persistent incongruence between their real and ideal self

      • E.g. low self-esteem and depression may result from a lifetime of conditional positive regard and the internalization of conditions of worth

  • Treatment implication: humanistic therapy (e.g. person-centered therapy) provides unconditional positive regard and promotes movement toward self-actualization

Cognitive perspective

  • Psychological disorders result from maladaptive thought patterns leading to negative emotional states and maladaptive behaviors:

    • Cognitive distortions, such as catastrophizing, overgeneralization, or all-or-nothing thinking, generate and maintain psychological disorders

      • E.g. a person with depression may engage in negative automatic thinking

  • Treatment implication: cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) identifies and challenges maladaptive thought patterns to change emotional and behavioral responses

Evolutionary perspective

  • Psychological disorders result from maladaptive expressions of once-adaptive traits

    • Behaviors that were useful in ancestral environments may be dysfunctional today

      • E.g. anxiety responses that were adaptive for detecting predators may be triggered maladaptively by modern social or environmental stressors;

  • The evolutionary perspective helps explain why certain disorders are universal across cultures, as they may reflect shared human evolutionary history

Sociocultural perspective

  • Psychological disorders result from maladaptive social and cultural relationships and dynamics:

    • Racism, sexism, ageism, poverty, discrimination, and social inequality all produce and maintain psychological disorders

    • Lack of social support and social isolation are significant contributors to mental health problems

      • E.g. higher rates of depression in marginalized groups may reflect the psychological burden of discrimination and social exclusion

  • Treatment implication: sociocultural approaches emphasize community-based approaches, social support systems, and addressing structural inequalities

Biological perspective

  • Psychological disorders result from physiological or genetic issues, such as:

    • neurotransmitter imbalances, hormonal regulation, or brain structure

      • E.g. schizophrenia is associated with dysregulation of dopamine systems and structural brain differences

  • Treatment implication: medication targeting the neurobiological causes of disorder, e.g. antidepressants, antipsychotics, anxiolytics

Summary table

Examiner Tips and Tricks

  • For Skill 4.B, you may be asked to make a defensible claim when comparing explanations of psychological disorder

    • A strong claim is that the biopsychosocial model provides a more complete explanation than any single perspective

    • Support this with evidence from multiple perspectives

    • Address the limitations of single-perspective explanations

    • Conclude that an eclectic or interactionist approach is best supported because psychological disorders usually have multiple contributing causes

Interaction models

  • No single perspective provides a complete account of psychological disorders

    • Instead, disorders are best understood as the result of interacting biological, psychological, and social factors

  • Interaction models emphasise that causes do not operate in isolation

    • Multiple influences combine to produce disorder.

  • Two key interaction models that illustrate this are:

    • the biopsychsocial model

    • the diathesis-stress model

The biopsychosocial model

  • The biopsychosocial model proposes that psychological disorders arise from the interaction of three levels:

    • Biological factors: genetic predispositions, neurochemical imbalances, brain structure, hormonal influences

    • Psychological factors: maladaptive thought patterns, unresolved emotional conflicts, learned associations, self-concept

    • Sociocultural factors: social support (or lack of), cultural norms, discrimination, poverty, relationships, community

  • These factors are interdependent:

    • biological vulnerabilities may be shaped by psychological and social experiences

    • social stress can lead to psychological and physiological changes

  • For example:

    • Depression is understood as involving:

      • a biological predisposition (e.g. reduced serotonin activity)

      • psychological factors (e.g. negative cognitive style, learned helplessness)

      • sociocultural factors (e.g. social isolation, adverse life events, cultural stigma around help-seeking)

  • The biopsychosocial model is widely seen as the most comprehensive, reflecting the eclectic approach that is used in clinical practice

The diathesis-stress model

  • The diathesis-stress model explains disorder as the interaction between vulnerability and stress

    • Diathesis: a genetic or biological predisposition that makes a person vulnerable to developing a disorder

    • Stress: environmental triggers (e.g. life events, adversity) that activate the diathesis

  • The disorder develops when stress exceeds the individual's threshold of vulnerability:

    • A person with high vulnerability may develop the disorder under relatively mild stress

    • A person with low vulnerability may only develop the disorder under severe or prolonged stress, or not develop it at all

  • The diathesis-stress model has strong support from twin studies:

    • identical twins show higher concordance rates for psychological disorders than fraternal twins

      • This demonstrates a genetic (diathesis) component

  • However, concordance rates are not 100% even for identical twins

    • This shows that genetic predisposition alone is insufficient, as environmental stress is also required

Comparing the two interaction models

Feature

Biopsychosocial Model

Diathesis-Stress Model

Core idea

Disorders result from the interaction of biological, psychological, and social factors

Disorders result from genetic vulnerability triggered by environmental stress

Factors considered

Biological + psychological + sociocultural

Biological (diathesis) + environmental (stress)

Emphasis

Broad integration of all three levels

Specific interaction between genetic risk and stress

  • Both models show that psychological disorders are multifactorial, arising from the interaction of internal vulnerabilities and external experiences

Examiner Tips and Tricks

Ensure that you understand these key points:

  • A genetic predisposition does not guarantee a disorder

    • A diathesis only leads to disorder when combined with sufficient environmental stress

    • Many individuals have genetic vulnerability but never develop the disorder

  • The biopsychosocial and diathesis-stress models are not the same

    • The biopsychosocial model is broader, integrating biological, psychological, and sociocultural factors

    • The diathesis-stress model focuses specifically on the interaction between genetic vulnerability and environmental stress

    • The diathesis-stress model can be seen as a narrower explanation within the wider biopsychosocial framework

Examiner Tips and Tricks

  • For Skill 4.B, you may be asked to make a defensible claim about causes of disorder

    • A strong claim is that neither genetics nor environment alone can explain psychological disorders

    • Use twin studies as evidence:

      • identical twins share 100% of DNA but are not always concordant

      • this shows genetic vulnerability is necessary but not sufficient

      • environmental stress is also required

  • For Skill 2.D evaluate twin studies as raising ethical issues. Consider:

    • informed consent and whether participants understood the research

    • risk of stigma from how findings are reported

Unlock more, it's free!

Join the 100,000+ Students that ❤️ Save My Exams

the (exam) results speak for themselves:

Raj Bonsor

Author: Raj Bonsor

Expertise: Psychology & Sociology Content Creator

Raj joined Save My Exams in 2024 as a Senior Content Creator for Psychology & Sociology. Prior to this, she spent fifteen years in the classroom, teaching hundreds of GCSE and A Level students. She has experience as Subject Leader for Psychology and Sociology, and her favourite topics to teach are research methods (especially inferential statistics!) and attachment. She has also successfully taught a number of Level 3 subjects, including criminology, health & social care, and citizenship.

Claire Neeson

Reviewer: Claire Neeson

Expertise: Psychology Content Creator

Claire has been teaching for 34 years, in the UK and overseas. She has taught GCSE, A-level and IB Psychology which has been a lot of fun and extremely exhausting! Claire is now a freelance Psychology teacher and content creator, producing textbooks, revision notes and (hopefully) exciting and interactive teaching materials for use in the classroom and for exam prep. Her passion (apart from Psychology of course) is roller skating and when she is not working (or watching 'Coronation Street') she can be found busting some impressive moves on her local roller rink.