Henry VIII: Foreign Policy After the Break with Rome, 1529-1547 (AQA A Level History: Component 1: Breadth study): Revision Note

Exam code: 7042

Lottie Bates

Written by: Lottie Bates

Reviewed by: Bridgette Barrett

Updated on

Summary

  • Henry VIII's foreign policy after the Break with Rome was transformed by diplomatic isolation following the excommunication of 1538

    • England became diplomatically isolated from Catholic Europe and faced the genuine threat of invasion

  • Cromwell's response was to seek Protestant allies in Europe through the Schmalkaldic League

    • Henry's rejection of Anne of Cleves destroyed this strategy and contributed to Cromwell's fall

  • Relations with France and the Habsburgs after 1534 were defined by constant repositioning as Henry tried to prevent the two powers from uniting against him

  • Henry's six wives and the three Acts of Succession were not just personal matters:

    • Some had significant diplomatic dimensions that shaped England's international position

  • Henry's last major military venture, the capture of Boulogne (1544), ended with Boulogne being promised back to France under the Treaty of Ardres (1546): a costly and ultimately fruitless campaign

  • Historians offer contrasting views:

    • Ives sees Henry as embodying regal magnificence and military success

    • Elton argues the later reign wasted resources and left England’s survival to chance rather than sound judgement

The Diplomatic Consequences of the Break with Rome

England's new diplomatic position

  • Before 1534, England had been a respected player in European diplomacy

    • After the Act of Supremacy and excommunication, it became a schismatic outcast in Catholic Europe

  • Pope Paul III excommunicated Henry in 1538

    • This released Henry’s subjects from their oaths of loyalty in theory

    • It also sanctioned rebellion and legitimised invasion by Catholic powers

  • Both Charles V and Francis I were orthodox Catholic rulers and could not publicly ally with a heretical king

    • Charles V was also Catherine of Aragon's nephew, giving him a personal grievance against Henry

The invasion threat, 1538–1539

  • In June 1538, Charles V and Francis I signed the Truce of Nice, temporarily ending their long conflict

    • For the first time, England faced the prospect of a united Catholic Europe directed against it

  • Henry responded with a major programme of coastal fortification

    • The Device Forts were built along the south coast, including Deal, Walmer and Camber Castles

    • They represented a genuine and lasting defensive achievement

  • Henry also struck at potential figureheads for a Catholic invasion at home

    • The Exeter Conspiracy (1538) led to the execution of Henry Courtenay, Marquess of Exeter, and Henry Pole, Lord Montague

    • Both had Plantagenet blood and could have been used as rival claimants by a Catholic invasion force

  • The threat receded by 1540 when France and Charles V’s Habsburg Empire returned to war with each other

    • But it had demonstrated how vulnerable England's diplomatic isolation had made it

Cromwell's Protestant alliance strategy

  • Cromwell's answer to isolation was to seek allies among the Protestant princes of Germany

    • The Schmalkaldic League was the alliance of German Protestant rulers who had broken with Rome

    • A marriage alliance with a Protestant German state would give England a powerful continental partner

  • This strategy led directly to the Anne of Cleves marriage (1540)

    • Anne was the sister of the Duke of Cleves, a significant Protestant ruler in north-west Germany

    • Henry found her physically repulsive (calling her a "great Flemish mare") and had the marriage annulled after six months

  • The collapse of the Anne of Cleves marriage destroyed Cromwell's broader diplomatic strategy

    • It also gave his enemies at court the ammunition they needed to bring him down

    • With Cromwell's fall, the Protestant alliance strategy was abandoned

Examiner Tips and Tricks

The invasion threat of 1538 to 1539 is underused by most students. It shows that the diplomatic consequences of the Break with Rome were genuinely dangerous, not just inconvenient. The Device Forts are physical evidence of how seriously Henry took the threat.

Cromwell's Protestant alliance strategy directly links foreign policy to the Fall of Cromwell revision note. If you are asked about either topic, this connection between the Anne of Cleves disaster and Cromwell's execution is essential analytical material.

Relations with France, Spain & the HRE after 1534

  • After 1534, Henry's foreign policy became increasingly reactive and expensive

  • He constantly sought to prevent France and the Habsburgs from uniting against him

  • The pattern was familiar from Wolsey's era: shifting alliances, diplomatic spectacle and limited lasting results

1534–1538

  • Diplomatic isolation deepened following the Act of Supremacy and excommunication

  • Henry had no reliable continental ally

  • Cromwell sought Protestant partners in Germany while Henry tried to keep France and Charles V’s Habsburg Empire divided

1538–1539

  • The Truce of Nice between France and the Habsburgs created the invasion threat

  • Henry built the Device Forts and executed potential Catholic figureheads

  • The threat receded when war resumed between France, Spain and the Holy Roman Empire in 1540

1540

  • The Anne of Cleves marriage was annulled after six months

  • England lost its one potential Protestant alliance partner

    • Cromwell fell

  • Henry married Catherine Howard, bringing the pro-Catholic Howard faction to dominance

1543

  • Treaty of Utrecht with Charles V: England and the Habsburgs allied against France

    • Henry finally got the French war he had always wanted

  • This was also the year of the Treaty of Greenwich with Scotland, attempting to arrange the marriage of the infant Mary Queen of Scots to Prince Edward

    • Scotland rejected it, leading to the outbreak of the Rough Wooing (a series of military campaigns to force the marriage)

1544

  • Henry invaded France and captured Boulogne in September 1544

  • This was the high point of the later foreign policy:

    • Henry secured a rare and sustained territorial foothold in France with the capture of Boulogne

  • Charles V then made a separate peace with France (Treaty of Crépy), leaving Henry exposed and without his ally

1546

  • The Treaty of Ardres ended the war with France

  • Boulogne was to be returned to France after eight years in exchange for a substantial French pension

  • Henry had spent enormous sums to hold a town he ultimately could not keep

  • He died in January 1547, before the handover

The broader verdict on relations with France and Spain

  • Henry never achieved a stable alliance with either France or the Habsburgs after 1534

    • Both powers used England when it suited them and abandoned it when it did not

    • Charles V allied with Henry in 1543 only to make a separate peace a year later

  • The wars of the 1540s were ruinously expensive

    • Henry spent the wealth accumulated from the dissolution on campaigns in France and Scotland

    • More than half of all monastic lands were sold off between 1543 and 1547 to fund the wars

  • England's actual strategic position in 1547 was little improved from 1534

    • No new territory had been permanently gained

    • The dynasty was secure, but largely thanks to the birth of Edward in 1537 rather than foreign policy success

Examiner Tips and Tricks

The capture of Boulogne in 1544 is often cited as evidence of foreign policy success. Push back on this: Charles V abandoned Henry almost immediately after the capture. The net result was financial ruin for a temporary trophy.

Don't confuse the Treaty of Utrecht (1543) with the Treaty of Ardres (1546). The first brought England into the war; the second ended it in embarrassing circumstances. Knowing both treaties shows command of the chronology.

Securing the Succession: Henry's Six Wives & the Acts of Succession

  • Henry's marriages were never purely personal:

    • Some had clear diplomatic purposes, while others had indirect consequences for England's international position

  • A disputed succession invited foreign intervention:

    • Both France and the Habsburgs had potential claimants they could have backed

The six wives and their diplomatic significance

Illustrations of Henry VIII's six wives: Catherine of Aragon, Anne Boleyn, Jane Seymour, Anne of Cleves, Catherine Howard, and Catherine Parr.
The Six Wives of Henry VIII

Catherine of Aragon (1509–1533)

  • Cemented the Spanish alliance

  • Mother of Princess Mary, strengthening dynastic links to Charles V and the Habsburg

  • Her divorce triggered the Break with Rome and created lasting hostility with Charles V, her nephew

Anne Boleyn (1533–1536)

  • No significant diplomatic alliance

  • Her Protestant sympathies helped push the Reformation forward

  • Executed on charges of adultery and treason

  • Mother of Princess Elizabeth

Jane Seymour (1536–1537)

  • No diplomatic dimension

  • Died giving birth to Edward, the male heir Henry had always needed

  • Edward’s birth temporarily resolved the succession crisis, but Jane’s death left the dynasty dependent on a single heir

Anne of Cleves (1540)

  • A deliberate Protestant diplomatic alliance with the Duchy of Cleves

  • Henry's rejection of her:

    • Destroyed the strategy

    • Ended Cromwell's political career

    • Wasted the one opportunity for a continental Protestant partner

Catherine Howard (1540–1542)

  • No diplomatic dimension

  • Her influence at court strengthened the conservative Catholic Howard faction

  • Executed for alleged adultery in February 1542

Catherine Parr (1543–1547)

  • No formal diplomatic role

  • Her Protestant sympathies and intellectual influence helped ensure the reforming faction around Hertford and Cranmer was well positioned for Edward VI's reign

The three Acts of Succession

  • First Act of Succession (1534): declared Mary illegitimate and made the children of Anne Boleyn heirs to the throne

    • It required all subjects to swear an oath accepting this

    • Refusal was treated as treason:

      • More and Fisher were executed partly for refusing

  • Second Act of Succession (1536): declared both Mary and Elizabeth illegitimate after Anne Boleyn's execution

    • It left the succession dangerously unclear if Jane Seymour failed to produce an heir

  • Third Act of Succession (1544): restored both Mary and Elizabeth to the succession in the order Edward, Mary, Elizabeth

    • This was the most significant settlement

      • It gave England a clear line of succession for the first time since 1509

    • It reduced the risk of foreign-backed rival claims and stabilised the dynastic position in the short term

      • But the religious differences between Edward, Mary and Elizabeth helped to create the instability of the mid-Tudor period

    • The order was confirmed in Henry's will and shaped the reigns of all three of his children

Examiner Tips and Tricks

The three Acts of Succession are frequently confused. The key one for exam purposes is the Third Act (1544), which restored Mary and Elizabeth and created the line of succession that actually played out after Henry's death. Make sure you know which Act did what.

The six wives question is not just about Henry's personal life. Each marriage tells you something about the diplomatic context and the factional struggle at court. Anne of Cleves is the most diplomatically significant wife of the post-1529 period and the one most likely to appear in foreign policy questions.

How Successful was Henry VIII's Foreign Policy?

  • This question covers the whole of Henry's reign, drawing on both foreign policy revision notes

  • Use the specific evidence below to build and support your own argument

Evidence that Henry VIII's foreign policy was successful

  • England's prestige was significantly raised in the early reign

    • The campaigns of 1513, the Treaty of London (1518) and the Field of the Cloth of Gold positioned England at the heart of European diplomacy

  • Flodden (1513) neutralised Scotland as a military threat for a generation

    • It was a more decisive strategic victory than anything achieved in France

  • England survived the potentially catastrophic threat of a united Catholic Europe in 1538/1539

    • The Device Forts provided a lasting coastal defence

    • The Exeter Conspiracy executions removed potential figureheads for invasion

  • Boulogne was captured in 1544

    • Henry became the first English king to take French territory in over a century

    • Whatever its later fate, the capture was a genuine military achievement

  • The Third Act of Succession (1544) gave England the clearest dynastic settlement since 1509

    • This reduced the risk of foreign intervention over a disputed succession

  • Henry died with his throne intact and the Tudor dynasty secure

Key historian

Eric W. Ives, Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (2004)


  • "To contemporaries, Henry was everything a king should be. For them, whether they might like or loathe his policies, Henry was everything a king should be; he had all the monarchical virtues in full measure. The first was magnificence, immediately obvious in his personal appearance. The reputation of the Field of the Cloth of Gold spread throughout Europe, not simply as a costly expensive exercise in image building, but as regal glory in action. A second contemporary royal virtue was military power and success. Henry's fascination with military technology, most notably heavy guns on board ship and the consequent need to encourage cannon-founding, was entirely in the kingly tradition. So was war. No one was allowed to forget Henry's triumph at the Battle of the Spurs, even though it was a skirmish fought in his absence. His armies not only won massive victories which culled two generations of Scottish nobles; in 1544 they savaged the lives of ordinary Scots and ruined the lowland economy. Supremely, with the capture of Boulogne, Henry became the only king to win territory in France for more than a century."

    • Ives argues that Henry succeeded on his own terms: he embodied the Renaissance ideals of magnificence and military prowess that contemporaries expected of a great king. His positive assessment is strongest when judged by contemporary standards rather than modern strategic ones

Evidence that Henry VIII's foreign policy failed to achieve its objectives

  • The Break with Rome created a diplomatic isolation that was never fully resolved in Henry's lifetime

    • England was excommunicated, cut off from Catholic Europe and threatened with invasion

    • No stable continental alliance was ever established after 1534

  • The wars of the 1540s were enormously expensive and produced no lasting gains

    • Boulogne was captured in 1544 and agreed to be returned to France under the Treaty of Ardres (1546), though it was not actually handed back until 1550

    • Charles V abandoned Henry almost immediately after Crépy to make a separate peace

  • Henry squandered the wealth of the dissolution on futile campaigns

    • More than half of all monastic lands were sold off between 1543 and 1547 to fund wars

    • The Crown lost the long-term income these lands would have generated

  • The Rough Wooing of Scotland (1543–1550) backfired

    • Henry's brutal military campaigns in Scotland pushed it closer to France rather than delivering union

    • The Treaty of Greenwich collapsed and the French alliance with Scotland strengthened

  • Henry left a 9-year-old son as his heir with no secure continental ally

    • England's diplomatic vulnerability in 1547 was arguably worse than in 1509

Key historian

G. R. Elton, Reform and Reformation: England, 1509–1558 (1977)


  • "Left to himself, King Henry VIII turned his hand to the search for personal glory and national aggrandisement, playing a part he had always fancied and never been fit for either in his personal capacities or the resources of his realms. His achievement must strike the reflective mind as remarkable: a grave threat of invasion from France, a continuous threat of war from Scotland, the wasting away of the Crown's recently enlarged resources, a country drained by the heaviest taxation for centuries (some of it dubiously legal), and a major crisis in what had been the least crisis-prone of the economies of western Europe. That his achievements did not destroy the monarchy which his father, Wolsey and Cromwell had fashioned, nor produce a real collapse and a class war in England, was none of his doing."

    • Elton's verdict is scathing: Henry was personally unfit for the role he pursued, and England's survival was in spite of his foreign policy rather than because of it. The phrase "none of his doing" is deliberately pointed and makes this one of the most useful quotes for a critical argument about Henry's effectiveness as a ruler

Examiner Tips and Tricks

The overarching judgement question rewards a clear line of argument, not a list of facts on both sides. A strong approach is to argue that Henry succeeded by contemporary standards (magnificence, military glory, dynastic security) but failed by modern strategic ones (no lasting territorial gains, financial strain, diplomatic isolation). Use Ives for the first and Elton for the second.

Unlock more, it's free!

Join the 100,000+ Students that ❤️ Save My Exams

the (exam) results speak for themselves:

Lottie Bates

Author: Lottie Bates

Expertise: History Content Creator

Lottie has worked in education as a teacher of History and Classical subjects, supporting students across GCSE, IGCSE and A Level. This has given her a strong understanding of how to help students succeed in exams, particularly when structuring written answers and using specific evidence effectively. She believes that studying history helps students make sense of the modern world, and is passionate about making complex topics clear, accessible and relevant to exam success.

Bridgette Barrett

Reviewer: Bridgette Barrett

Expertise: Geography, History, Religious Studies & Environmental Studies Subject Lead

After graduating with a degree in Geography, Bridgette completed a PGCE over 30 years ago. She later gained an MA Learning, Technology and Education from the University of Nottingham focussing on online learning. At a time when the study of geography has never been more important, Bridgette is passionate about creating content which supports students in achieving their potential in geography and builds their confidence.