Henry VIII: The Fall of Cromwell & Factions at Court, 1539-1547 (AQA A Level History: Component 1: Breadth study): Revision Note

Exam code: 7042

Lottie Bates

Written by: Lottie Bates

Reviewed by: Bridgette Barrett

Updated on

Summary

  • Cromwell's power suddenly collapsed in 1540, followed by a decade of factional struggle between conservative and reforming groups at Henry's court

  • Cromwell was executed in 1540:

    • He was brought down by the Anne of Cleves marriage "disaster", the Howard faction's scheming, and ultimately by Henry's personal decision to destroy him

  • After Cromwell, court politics was dominated by rivalry between the conservative faction (led by the Duke of Norfolk and Bishop Gardiner) and the reforming faction (led by the Earl of Hertford)

  • The Six Articles (1539) and the King's Book (1543) represented a conservative backlash in religion, reasserting Catholic doctrine and limiting some of the Protestant direction associated with Cromwell's reforms

  • The conservatives ultimately lost:

    • Norfolk was arrested in 1546, and the reformers around Hertford were well positioned to control the government of the young Edward VI

  • Historians debate whether Henry VIII was an effective ruler who controlled his ministers, or whether factional instability in his final years reveals the fundamental weakness of his style of kingship

The Fall of Cromwell, 1540: Why was he Executed?

Illustration of a historical figure in a black hat and brown fur collar, identified as Thomas Cromwell, facing left against a white background.
Thomas Cromwell

Cromwell's position by 1540

  • By early 1540, Cromwell appeared to be at the peak of his power

    • He had just been created Earl of Essex and Lord Great Chamberlain

    • He had survived the Pilgrimage of Grace, the dissolution and the fall of Anne Boleyn

    • He had no obvious rival in government

  • Yet, within months, he was in the Tower, attainted and executed

    • His fall was rapid, total and irreversible

The Anne of Cleves "disaster"

  • Cromwell had arranged Henry's fourth marriage to Anne of Cleves in 1540 as a Protestant diplomatic alliance

    • Henry found her physically unattractive on their first meeting

      • Henry reportedly said she looked like a horse ("a great Flemish mare")

    • The marriage was annulled after just six months

  • Henry never forgave Cromwell for the humiliation

    • It left Cromwell politically exposed and unable to rely on Henry's personal goodwill

The Howard faction

  • The conservative Catholic faction, led by Thomas Howard, Duke of Norfolk, had been waiting for an opportunity to destroy Cromwell

    • Norfolk introduced Henry to his niece, Catherine Howard, who quickly caught Henry's attention

      • The Howards now had direct personal access to the king and used it ruthlessly

  • Cromwell was accused of heresy and treason

    • The heresy charge was ironic:

      • Cromwell was a moderate Protestant in practice

    • He was alleged to have said he would fight even against Henry's wishes to defend Protestant reform

The execution

  • Cromwell was suddenly arrested at a Privy Council meeting on 10 June 1540

    • This shocked many contemporaries who believed he was still secure in Henry's favour

  • Cromwell was attainted by Parliament in June 1540, condemned without trial

    • He wrote a desperate letter to Henry begging for mercy

      • Henry ignored it

  • Cromwell was executed on Tower Hill, 28 July 1540

    • Henry later expressed regret, reportedly saying he had been misled into destroying the best servant he had ever had

      • This suggests that the Howards and Gardiner may have manipulated Henry, rather than simply acting on his wishes

Examiner Tips and Tricks

Cromwell's fall illustrates a key theme: ministerial power was always conditional on royal favour. Wolsey and Cromwell both rose to extraordinary heights and were destroyed when Henry withdrew his support. The pattern matters more than the individual cases.leves marriage was the immediate trigger, but the underlying cause was the Howard faction's patient scheming. The strongest answers distinguish between trigger and underlying cause.

Faction at Court after Cromwell: Conservatives vs Reformers

Illustration of two factions: Conservative led by Thomas Howard and Stephen Gardiner, Reforming led by Edward Seymour.
Illustration depicting the main factions under Henry VIII
  • After Cromwell's fall, no single minister replaced him as chief minister

    • Instead, Henry governed through two competing factions whose rivalry defined the politics of the 1540s

The conservative faction

  • Led by Thomas Howard, Duke of Norfolk and Stephen Gardiner, Bishop of Winchester

  • Catholic in sympathy and determined to halt Protestant doctrinal change

  • Benefited from Henry's marriage to Catherine Howard (1540)

  • Lost influence catastrophically when Catherine Howard was arrested for alleged adultery and executed in February 1542

  • Gardiner remained influential into the mid-1540s, but was excluded from the regency council Henry drew up before his death

  • Norfolk was arrested on treason charges in December 1546; his son the Earl of Surrey was executed in January 1547

The reforming faction

  • Led by Edward Seymour, Earl of Hertford (Jane Seymour's brother and Edward VI's uncle)

  • Protestant in sympathy and keen to push the Reformation further

  • Gained influence through Henry's final marriage to the educated and reforming Catherine Parr (1543)

  • Archbishop Cranmer survived conservative attempts to destroy him in the 1540s because Henry personally protected him

  • Hertford positioned himself perfectly for Edward VI's minority by securing control of the regency council

  • The reformers who won the factional battle under Henry were the same men who governed England under Edward VI

Examiner Tips and Tricks

The factional struggle of 1540 to 1547 matters beyond Henry's reign. The reformers' victory directly explains the Protestant direction of Edward VI's government. If you are asked about continuity and change across the Tudor period, this is a key link.

Henry retained personal authority throughout. He personally protected Cranmer when the conservatives tried to destroy him, and he personally decided which faction dominated at any given moment. Faction was real, but Henry was never simply a puppet of either side.

The Conservative Reaction: Religion & Politics, 1539–1547

  • After the rapid Protestant-leaning changes of 1536 to 1538, Henry pulled back towards Catholic orthodoxy

  • This conservative reaction was driven by three overlapping forces:

    • Henry's own theological conservatism: he had never intended to change doctrine, only Church governance

    • The need for Catholic allies in Europe as the threat of a Franco-Habsburg alliance loomed

    • The Howard faction's growing influence at court following Anne of Cleves and Catherine Howard

The Six Articles, 1539

  • This was pushed through Parliament by the Duke of Norfolk in 1539

  • It reasserted six core Catholic doctrines:

    • Transubstantiation: the bread and wine at Mass literally become the body and blood of Christ

    • Clerical celibacy: priests could not marry

    • Private masses, auricular confession and communion in one kind were all reaffirmed

  • It imposed severe penalties: denial of transubstantiation was punishable by death

    • It was known by Protestants as "the whip with six strings"

  • The impact was immediate:

    • Protestant bishops Latimer and Shaxton resigned their positions

    • Archbishop Cranmer discreetly sent his wife to live in Germany, as the articles required clerical celibacy

    • Protestant reformers at court were temporarily silenced

Examiner Tips and Tricks

The Six Articles are often misread as evidence that the Reformation had been reversed. It had not. They changed doctrine, not the Royal Supremacy. Henry remained Supreme Head of the Church of England. The Break with Rome was permanent; the doctrinal direction was not.

The King's Book, 1543

  • This was a revised doctrinal statement replacing the more Protestant Bishop's Book of 1537

    • It was more Catholic in tone, reaffirming traditional practices and doctrine

    • It showed Henry consciously pulling back from the Protestant direction of the late 1530s

Why the conservative reaction proved temporary

  • Catherine Howard's fall in February 1542 destroyed the Howards' direct influence over Henry

    • She was arrested for alleged adultery and executed

    • Norfolk's family lost the personal access to Henry they had relied upon

  • Henry's marriage to Catherine Parr (1543) brought reformers back into his close circle

    • Catherine Parr was educated, Protestant in sympathy and genuinely intellectually influential

  • The Howards overreached in 1546 when they tried to have Cranmer arrested on heresy charges

    • Henry personally intervened to protect Cranmer, handing him his own ring as a token of royal favour

    • This episode revealed the limits of factional power: Henry could shut down any attack when he chose to

  • Norfolk was arrested in December 1546; his son the Earl of Surrey was executed in January 1547

    • Henry died on 28 January 1547, with Norfolk still in the Tower

    • The reformers around Hertford and Cranmer inherited power with little immediate opposition

Examiner Tips and Tricks

When writing about the conservative reaction, always link it back to faction. The Six Articles were not simply Henry's personal religious preference: they were the political product of the Howards' dominance at court in 1539. When Howard influence collapsed in 1542, the conservative reaction lost its political engine.

How Effectively was England Governed under Henry VIII?

  • This question draws on evidence from across the whole of Henry VIII's reign

  • Use the specific evidence below to build and support your own argument

Evidence that Henry VIII governed effectively

  • Henry demonstrated consistent personal control over his ministers

    • Wolsey and Cromwell were both promoted and destroyed entirely at Henry's will

    • This suggests Henry was the puppeteer, not the puppet: he chose when to act and when to delegate

  • The Break with Rome and the Reformation Parliament represented a genuine constitutional achievement

    • Parliament was used to give sweeping changes a legal legitimacy that proved very hard to reverse

    • The Royal Supremacy permanently transformed the relationship between Crown, Church and Parliament

  • The dissolution of the monasteries was efficiently executed and brought enormous wealth to the Crown

    • It required complex administrative machinery and was completed within five years

  • England remained stable and largely free from major domestic revolt for most of the reign

    • The Pilgrimage of Grace (1536) was the most serious challenge but was suppressed without major military engagement

  • The Privy Council emerged as a more professional body, laying the foundations for later Tudor government

Key historians

M. Everett, The Rise of Thomas Cromwell (2015)


  • "Certainly Henry VIII was a king willing to allow his ministers to rid him of the daily toils of government, and as several chapters have illustrated here, there were areas over which Cromwell had very real influence. But more often than not, Cromwell's independence was over the execution of policy, not its formulation. The significant point to emerge from many chapters here is that during the years 1531 to 1534, Cromwell was working for, and taking his lead from, his royal master."

    • Everett's revisionist assessment directly challenges the older view that Cromwell was the real power behind Henry. By insisting that Cromwell executed rather than formulated policy, Everett places Henry firmly in control and supports the argument that the reign was effectively governed

Evidence that Henry VIII's governance had serious weaknesses

  • The factional instability of the 1540s revealed the dangers of Henry's personal style of kingship

    • Without a dominant minister after Cromwell's fall, rival factions competed destructively for royal favour

    • Policy became inconsistent and erratic, shifting between Protestant and Catholic positions

  • Henry wasted the financial gains of the dissolution on expensive and largely fruitless foreign wars

    • More than half of all monastic lands were sold off between 1543 and 1547 to fund campaigns in France

    • The Crown lost the long-term income these lands would have generated

  • The succession was repeatedly destabilised by Henry's personal decisions

    • Three of his six wives were discarded or executed

    • Mary and Elizabeth were both declared illegitimate at different points, then reinstated

    • The succession crisis this created was never fully resolved in Henry's lifetime

  • The executions of More, Fisher and Cromwell damaged England's international reputation

    • They also illustrated how Henry's government operated through fear rather than consent

  • Henry left a 9-year-old son as his heir, making a contested minority government almost inevitable

Key historians

J. Guy, History Review (1995)


  • "He played the leading part in subordinating the clergy to the crown; he orchestrated the press campaign in defence of the break with Rome. Above all, he enforced the Royal Supremacy by means of oaths of allegiance and extensions to the treason law. The putsch of mid-1536 gave Cromwell the pre-eminent ascendancy he had hitherto lacked. His power was real, but it was less secure than Wolsey's."

    • Guy's assessment highlights the fragility underlying Cromwell's power: however pre-eminent he became, his position always depended on royal favour rather than institutional authority. This supports the argument that Henry's governing style, while effective in the short term, created structural instability by making all power personal and conditional

Examiner Tips and Tricks

This is the overarching evaluative question for the whole of Henry VIII's government. Draw on evidence from across all the revision notes: Wolsey's rise and fall, Cromwell's reforms, the Break with Rome, the dissolution and the factional struggles of the 1540s. A narrow answer focusing only on one period will not score highly.

The best answers reach a clear judgement rather than simply listing points on both sides. A strong line of argument might be: Henry governed effectively in terms of achieving his personal aims, but his style of kingship created structural instability that became apparent in the factional chaos of his final years and the minority government that followed.

Unlock more, it's free!

Join the 100,000+ Students that ❤️ Save My Exams

the (exam) results speak for themselves:

Lottie Bates

Author: Lottie Bates

Expertise: History Content Creator

Lottie has worked in education as a teacher of History and Classical subjects, supporting students across GCSE, IGCSE and A Level. This has given her a strong understanding of how to help students succeed in exams, particularly when structuring written answers and using specific evidence effectively. She believes that studying history helps students make sense of the modern world, and is passionate about making complex topics clear, accessible and relevant to exam success.

Bridgette Barrett

Reviewer: Bridgette Barrett

Expertise: Geography, History, Religious Studies & Environmental Studies Subject Lead

After graduating with a degree in Geography, Bridgette completed a PGCE over 30 years ago. She later gained an MA Learning, Technology and Education from the University of Nottingham focussing on online learning. At a time when the study of geography has never been more important, Bridgette is passionate about creating content which supports students in achieving their potential in geography and builds their confidence.